GENETIC EXTINCTION TECHNOLOGY
The history of biological warfare is nearly as old as the history of warfare itself. In ancient times, warring parties poisoned wells or used arrowheads with natural toxins. Mongol invaders catapulted plague victims into besieged cities, probably causing the first great plague epidemic in Europe, and British settlers distributed smallpox-infected blankets to Native Americans.
However, more and more we are learning that secretly, there are genetic engineers developing weapons that are far more sophisticated. Biologiocal weapons that target certain groups of people are becoming more advanced.
The genetically engineered ‘superbug’— highly lethal and resistant to environmental influence or any medical treatment, is only a small part of this story. Much more alarming, from an arms-control perspective, are the possibilities of developing completely novel weapons on the basis of knowledge provided by biomedical research — developments that are already taking place.
Such weapons, designed for new types of conflicts and warfare scenarios, secret operations or sabotage activities, are not mere science fiction, but are increasingly becoming a reality that we have to face.
In debates about genetic engineering and biological weapons, it is often stated that natural pathogens are sufficiently dangerous and deadly, and that genetic engineering is not necessary to turn them into more effective biological weapons.
The same can be said for conventional weapons being deadly and dangerous and yet we have nuclear capabilities, and advanced artificial intelligence capable of launching nuclear warheads at a predetermined target.
Today, access to highly virulent agents and strains are increasingly regulated and restricted. One In particular is smallpox, which was eradicated more than 20 years ago.
Officially it is only stored at two high-security laboratories in the USA and Russia, and it is at present virtually impossible to gain access to these virus stocks. But considering the rapid development of molecular biology, it is only a question of time before the artificial synthesis of agents or new combinations of agents becomes possible.
A research team at the State University of New York at Stony Brook chemically synthesized an artificial polio virus from scratch. They started with the genetic sequence of the agent, which is available online, ordered small, tailor-made DNA sequences and combined them to reconstruct the complete viral genome.
In a final step, the synthesized DNA was brought to life by adding a chemical cocktail that initiated the production of a living, pathogenic virus.
In principle, this method could be used to synthesize other viruses with similarly short DNA sequences. This includes Ebola virus, Marburg virus, Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus and the pneumonic plague.
The reason they it synthesized these pathogens is just to see if they could do it.
If this was done elsewhere in the world, it would be seen as an act of war.
The global norm against biological weapons, laid down in the 1925 Geneva Convention and the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, clearly contributed to the fact that few countries have been engaged in research into offensive bio-warfare during recent decades.
Science is capable of genetically modifying our foods and now genetically modifying a pathogen — force multiplying its viral capabilities can now be seen as genetic extinction technology.
It is the mother of all genomic discoveries that rivals the nuclear warfare programs developed in the 1940’s.
New technological possibilities met new military concepts in the USA and led to a renewed interest in weapons that, until recently, had been banned and rejected.
Emails recently made available through the Freedom of Information Act now reveal that A US military agency is investing $100m in genetic extinction technologies that could wipe out malarial mosquitoes, invasive rodents or other species.
The documents suggest that the US’s secretive Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has become the world’s largest funder of “gene drive” research.
The UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) is debating whether to impose a moratorium on the gene research next year and several southern countries fear a possible military application.
UN diplomats confirmed that the new email release would worsen the “bad name” of gene drives in some circles.
The use of genetic extinction technologies in bio-weapons is the stuff of nightmares—so far the documents that are declassified tell us that the science is being developed to render extinct – many pests and vermin.
Cutting-edge gene editing tools such as Crispr-Cas9 work by using a synthetic RNA to cut into DNA strands and then insert, alter or remove targeted traits. These might, for example, distort the sex-ratio of mosquitoes to effectively wipe out malarial populations.
However what will that do to the ecosystem and to species that depend on these mosquitoes for food sources.
I am sure that many of the classified documents and data have information on how humans can also be targeted with genetic extinction technology.
Between 2008 and 2014, the US government spent about $820m on synthetic biology. Since 2012, most of this has come from DARPA and other military agencies.
Chemical and biological weapons conjure in the mind terror and have been repeatedly cited as a pretext for both acts of military aggression and even entire wars. Scenes of soldiers and civilians choking on toxic chemicals or covered in boils after exposure are horrific images both geopolitically and in fiction.
A US policy think tank as early as 2000 in a publication titled, “Rebuilding America’s Defense” Project for the New American Century” is a virtual blueprint of the plans and means the US sought to utilize toward achieving global hegemony, would make particular note of bio-weapons and the use of genotype-specific weapons, stating:
“Although it may take several decades for the process of transformation to unfold, in time, the art of warfare on air, land, and sea will be vastly different than it is today, and “combat” likely will take place in new dimensions: in space, “cyber-space,” and perhaps the world of microbes.”
Remember that this was the same publication that prior to the 911 attacks indicated that an increase of defense spending would have America’s blessing if there was a “new Pearl Harbor” to galvanize the citizens into demanding a new war foothold.
In 2004, The Guardian newspaper printed and article with the headline, “Could you make a genetically targeted weapon?” and it said:
“The prospect that rogue scientists could develop bioweapons designed to target certain ethnic groups based on their genetic differences was raised this week in a report by the British Medical Association (BMA).
The report, Biotechnology, Weapons and Humanity II, warns that construction of genetic weapons “is now approaching reality”. Such “genetic bombs” could contain anthrax or bubonic plague tailored to activate only when genes indicated the infected person was from a particular group.”
The Apartheid regime in South Africa attempted to produce biological weapons to induce infertility among the nation’s black population.
PBS Frontline’s article, “What Happened in South Africa?” would recount:
In 1998 South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission held hearings investigating activities of the apartheid-era government. Toward the end of the hearings, the Commission looked into the apartheid regime’s Chemical and Biological Warfare (CBW) program and allegations that it developed a sterility vaccine to use on black South Africans, employed toxic and chemical poison weapons for political assassination, and in the late 1970s provided anthrax and cholera to Rhodesian troops for use against guerrilla rebels in their war to overthrow Rhodesia’s white minority rule.
While South Africa’s entire Chemical and Biological Warfare program was abhorrent, what is particularly frightening is the use of South Africa’s national vaccination program as a vector for infecting black women with viruses meant to sterilize them. Now that vaccination programs are being pushed globally, there lies the danger that such weapons could be used against entire regions of the planet.
Weeks ago, Prince William called for “urgent depopulation efforts” in Africa. All the while the Plague was ravaging Africa. This form of the plague has been described as rare and is now showing resistance to antibiotic treatments.
Officials from the World Health Organization (WHO) have warned there is a risk the disease could spread to other continents. Scientists also believe the disease – which can kill in 24 hours – could become untreatable in the future if the virus mutates.
At this time evidence is mounting that the plague is a force multiplied genetically modified bio-weapon being used to kill off African populations.
What’s the quickest and easiest way for globalists to eliminate targeted human populations? Release a weaponized infectious disease and let it spread from city to city while using the outbreak to strengthen government funding of the vaccine and pharmaceutical industries. This, of course, is a form of medical genocide.
Vaccines and pharmaceuticals are now confirmed to be routinely used to reduce targeted populations rather than save lives. For example, a bombshell science paper was released that documents the covert infertility chemical being spiked into W.H.O. vaccines administered in African nations.
There is evidence to suggest that there is a covert depopulation program being carried out by the World Health Organization targeting Africans for extermination via infertility chemicals administered under the guise of vaccines.
It was reported that Local governments, told young African women they needed these vaccine injections for their own health and safety. But the real agenda was to cause their bodies to kill their own unborn babies as part of a globalist depopulation agenda. Africa is repeatedly chosen as a testing ground for weaponized depopulation viral and bacterial strains, by the way, which is one reason why so many deadly, hyper-aggressive diseases are found spreading in Africa.
These genocidal tactics are carried out in the name of science and medicine by other following vectors:
• Food supply (laced with infertility chemicals, confirmed by a U.S. science advisor to the President.
• Water supply (heavy metals poisoning, as we recently witnessed in Flint, Michigan)
• Medical experimentation similar to the Tuskegee, Guatemalan prisoner experiments funded by the U.S. government.
• Immunization campaign
• Cancer (disproportionately affects people of darker skin color due to vitamin D deficiency)
• Abortion activities that target blacks in order to harvest baby organ tissue for use in vaccines, which is technically medical cannibalism.
As I have said many times. Timing is everything and as we look at the stories of genetic tinkering on a grand scale and the calls for depopulation we have to address the issue of the possibility of a major cull that has begun around the world.
There are a number of other points to ponder as the United Nations has become more aggressive on their stance for global sustainability, issuing reports on human effects on wildlife habitat, which was the basis for Prince William’s comment on over-population.
I cannot stress enough that there has a been an ongoing push for depopulation using the “climate change ” narrative which claims human populations must be reduced to save the planet.
Africa’s current population explosion makes it the highest priority target for government-run depopulation efforts. We can also speculate that some of these depopulation exercises have taken place in Brazil where mosquitoes were used as a vector to spread the Zika virus which created severe birth defects in children.
We are all literally living through and witnessing an active genocidal Holocaust taking place right now, and it’s all being carried out in the name of “science” while touting vaccines, GMOs and Planned Parenthood. The “final solution” goal is the complete extermination of people in an effort to free up resources for the elite.
Thanks to RNA interference experiments, a genetic extinction technology can be administered to a large population thus reducing it and it can be done with plausible deniability.