While I talk about a lot of crazy things on my show, I want to stress that what I try to present are Fortean concepts. The truth about the Fortean point of view that there are times in history where reality breaks down and that when you use to the term reality you should always remember that the word in a Fortean sense should always be used in quotes.
In a Fortean sense, there is a hairline of difference between reality and fantasy and in that realm we realize that “belief” is a word where the word lie his hidden between the lines and that the truth is stranger than fiction and that most of what we believe changes like the days fashion, whether it be the latest hat or dance craze.
The reality breakdown is occurring as we speak now. It is getting a rewrite and everything we think we know, that we question and satisfy with opinion is being changed and repackaged.
I can’t provide total proof of reality breakdown, but I am watching it in the mainstream media, and thus I have to consider that the narrative is responsible for a literal reality redo, a retro causality creating conspiracy theories that really are more than theories but attempts to somehow put reality into perspective without letting anyone know that secretly tucked away in all of our utility drawers is a tin foil hat that we will proudly wear because we know that no one truly lives in a universe that is fully objective.
Prior to December 21st, 2012 we had presented a number of shows about the limiting concepts of time and how we are a slave to it and how reality could very well be a construction based on those electronic signals we see.
I mean that all things we see and perceive are electric stimulus and light that transmits information that we can pay attention to, and then of course there are this details that we don’t.
This is where I have spoken before about a temporal blind spot where events happen or we perceive they do and then later we are schooled on the idea that everything we have perceived is wrong, that what we think we know is not exactly what is and that somehow we reach a point where we are satisfied with our opinion and even then all that it is based on is once again nebulous stimuli that we agree to.
The process of selective perception is necessary because if we did not do this we would be transfixed by the hyper reality and sensory overload. Today our brains are being filled with all sorts of sensory overload. Think about it, we have simple perceptions of life, light, love, survival, spirituality, God, etc. Then we are exposed to media, print, Television, internet, video games, telephony, and many other things that is pushing the brain further and all of that stimulus is placed in a limited area known as the brain.
We do not know if the brain is limitless and we have learned that in old age we begin to lose memory and our perception of time.
If our model for perceiving our environment and time is limited or if we happen to perceive something while in crisis or after a traumatic experience, we run the obvious risk of missing important information that may be crucial for our well-being and survival; or conversely of hallucinating imaginary information that may be misleading or hurtful.
Think of those moments in your life where your perception of time has slowed down. Many people tell the story of missing time, or time that has slowed down just before the impact of an automobile accident or a fall.
With this in mind let us think about world events and how we all have an opinion on what is going on based on the narrative provided by the media. There have been several events in history, that have been traumatizing to the nation as a whole. So traumatizing in fact that people are confused about what really went on and rather than overload with details are satisfied to the watered down explanations provided by the media that is under the direction of corporate interest and quite frankly produces news that is sanitized by the Pentagon and in some cases the executive branch of government.
Very few average people have the discipline to check their views and beliefs with the criteria of consistency. The average person when listening to proposed authority needs to also internally decide if any claim that has been made provides verifiable documentation to your satisfaction. Do all of the pieces of information provided fit the dialogue and time line provided?
If they do not then do you reject the claim or do you investigate further? The average person will not even go that far. While the experiences of the world differ do you still decide that what you have seen in the narrative is reality?
Who in the world has the ambition to weigh everything based on what is really transpiring and not what the narrative provides or what the inner core belief you possess tends to cloud?
Problems in any of the traits I have described go ignored by the average person. They are also forgotten and are replaced by emotional belief and not on anything dealing with fact with respect to time or environment.
If there is an extreme break with the reality and the world view, there is always the consensus opinion that the mental health of the person is under suspicion. However, there has never been a consensus opinion that the breakdown of reality is happening and that people now are not exactly privy to harsh realities that are creating that blind spot in time and that selective reality that seems to be a refuge for the person in denial.
Take into account the behavior of the United States right now. How have we become so divided in such a small amount of time. How is it that when the vice president threatens that the President can use executive orders to take away guns from citizens there is really no flinch or commentary from the mainstream narrative? The flinch and the reactions are coming from a very loud group of Americans that see it as a violation of constitutional law.
The truth is that it is a violation. The truth is that these things have happened before way back in time, in history and the results have been the deaths of thousands and yet in this reality breakdown, the media cheers it on and Americans caught up in a selective memory of world events are walking aimlessly towards a constitutional crisis without even realizing the pain it may cause long term in the future.
We are seeing reality break down because the masters know how to manipulate time, rewrite reality and change world view and it is being done because we are giving consent to them by moving in a direction they are wanting us to move in while under the influence of trauma.
While we as a nation are under a traumatic spell, the powers that be are aware that they can dilate the timeline and while it has slowed down they can insert thoughts, views, and misconceptions that create sweeping social change.
I have cited many examples of this in the past and now I think it is imperative we do it again before we make a terrible mistake and allow for some sweeping changes that we will not be able to erase.
When looking back at historical events and world views on the events, can you with all honesty say that you know that the version you believe is the version that actually happened?
Take for example the assassination of John F. Kennedy. It is a piece of history that has a version that is the so called official version. It is said that a lone gunman shot Kennedy named Lee Harvey Oswald. The shot according to the official report came from the book depository over Dealey Plaza entering the president from the back.
There, of course, is a film called the Zapruder film where its shows the motorcade slowing down and then we see the president’s head fly back as his entire face is obliterated from the front. Witnesses say that the killer shot came from the grassy knoll. The area was in front of the motorcade. The witnesses were ignored the evidence showing that there was conspiracy was evident and even though a majority of Americans do not believe the official story provided by the Warren commission our world view of that moment is skewed and a schism exists.
The only way we now can describe what happened is based on electronic images that have been shown over and over on the History channel. There are a few witnesses that may say they saw something on the grassy knoll but their testimony will fade over time and soon the idea of an alternative story will also be erased as time passes by.
The events of September 11th, 2001 are also a curious example of how reality breaks down in the face of what is seen as opposed to what we are told. In our tragedy we block out certain details that clash or do not measure up to what is called the official story and so there are many people who now say that they believe that perhaps that what we think happened did not happen and that perhaps we are being told to think about it in a certain way without question.
However, when the event occurred there seemed to be a few time discrepancies that most people don’t remember.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency was called into New York on Monday, September 10th, 2011 – one day before the attack. FEMA spokesman Tom Kenney in an interview conducted by Dan Rather on Wednesday, September 12th, 2001, stated that FEMA was deployed to New York on Monday night, September 10th, to be ready to go into action on Tuesday morning. The question is for what? Why were they there a day before? Were they tipped off – or was there a time discrepancy with some sort of retro causality where the effect happened before the cause.
Another miraculous retro causality happened when Mayor Rudolph Giuliani notified ABC news that he was informed prior to the North and South Tower collapse that they would indeed collapse. He was actually caught in building 7 and was rescued before it was demolished. They were ordered to leave the area because they were told the towers would collapse, another incident or retro causality. In other words, speaking of the event or somehow projecting an event. before the actual event.
We were told that no one had any idea that these events were going to happen and yet there are two incidences where the timeline ripples and you get a foreshadowing of events.
Reporters were also reporting that the Solomon brothers building or building 7 collapsed 20 minutes prior to it actually happening. Reporters were seen saying the building was down while it was still behind them.
Another example of retrocausality, right? People say that the government is incapable of staging anything and so we have to go with the idea of reality break down and trauma-based time dilation, meaning the whole world witnessed a miracle of time bending.
Is it possible? I mean, were we all fooled?
Yet these events created enough outrage that government decided to pass unconstitutional mandates to take rights away from citizens.
There is also the matter of reporters on the news suggesting the towers were brought down in a controlled demolition. Peter Jennings made the comment on national Television as did Dan Rather and Tom Brokaw.
And what about an eyewitness account reported on the mainstream news about no plane hitting the Pentagon?
Is this for real, did we block out all of this in our moment of trauma and with all of the excitement gone are all of these accounts now all part of conspiracy nonsense? Or can we surmise that something similar as to what happens during an automobile accident happened where we dilated time and selectively rejected the first impressions of what really happened during that tragic time.
The idea of a reality breakdown is very compelling now isn’t it? Is the proof of a reality breakdown enough to change your world view or are you still stubborn and want to believe a lie that is a product of social engineering?
The powers that be are well aware of what it means to shape world view and they use the media to manipulate time and they persist in honoring half truths and lies and demonstrate to the public that anyone that is against the perceived world view is a crank, a conspiracy theorist, and someone that is not supposed to be trusted.
The power of a person’s worldview cannot be overstated. It is a determining factor in what kinds of behaviors a person will take in response to a given situation. It is nearly impossible to change a person’s personality, and changing someone’s opinions is often an exercise in futility. But if you change people’s worldviews, you have changed not only the things they have the ability to perceive, and but also the entire range of options they have available for taking action.
Take for example the Sandy Hook shooting. Even though that this massacre along with the Aurora shooting and the shooting in Tucson are being used as examples for reasons to enact executive orders for the seizing of guns, there is not one American that can give full details of what happened at Sandy Hook. They do not have full details, they do not know who the real suspects are, they even aren’t even sure of the date it happened and if you go back to time stamps on the internet you will find that while the mainstream reported the shooting happened on December 14 th, 2012 there were tributes on the internet that were posted on December 10th, 2012.
I was alerted to a video that was produced by a well known weather forecaster and geologist watchdog Dutchsinse. He was angry and a bit confused about a video found on Vimeo that purported to show a Sandy Hook tribute to the victims of the school shooting time stamped December 10th, 2012.
I even posted in my Facebook a screenshot of the tribute page for Victoria Soto who apparently died while protecting her students. The date of the tribute was December 10th, 2012.
There was also a United Way message that sent it’s condolences to the Victims of the Sandy Hook shooting on December 11, 2012.
How did this happen? Are we sure of the date? Could we have somehow dilated a time span over 3 of four days where a retro causal anomaly transpired and we have all been traumatized into living out the tragedy without even knowing the details?
Can we also explain another unexplainable ripple in time where in the movie the Dark Knight rises Commissioner Gordon points to a map of Gotham city and just below it he points to an Island Called Sandy Hook? Gordon calls the Sandy Hook area “Strike Zone One!”
Is it also a bit peculiar that this film was the film where James Holmes arrived and shot and killed people in a theater?
Is it also a bit of coincidence that the prop master of the Dark Knight Rises and the creator of the Gotham/Sandy Hook map is now dead? According to a Connecticut newspaper:
Scott Getzinger, a property master who provided props for more than 25 films, including “Spider-Man,” “Independence Day,” “The Truman Show” and the upcoming “Men in Black III” and “The Dark Knight Rises,” died at Stamford Hospital after sustaining severe injuries.
Getzinger suffered multiple broken bones, but was described as conscious and alert after being cut out of the 2002 Ford F-150 pickup truck he was driving. State police initially characterized his injuries as non-life threatening.”
There are so many coincidences and pieces that don’t fit into this puzzle that even the media has absconded from reporting anything about Sandy Hook, because all of the emotional baggage is being used to create a dialogue for gun control.
Once again the question is what do you really know about Sandy Hook? Why are we so willing to surrender our constitution to a reality breakdown that seems to be happening in many areas of our world view.
Reality began unraveling and a fever pitch just before December 21st, 2012 and after the consciousness and world view was manipulated it seemed that our world and our country was placed in a nightmare state where we are now awaiting civil war.
It is a nightmare when you also consider that Hollywood is also ready to once again socially engineer the world view and bend history in favor of the belief that Osama Bin Laden died on May 1st, 2011 when there are many reports that he died in 2001.
Can anyone agree that now is the time where the Fortean view of reality has to be brought up because the world view and reality is on the verge of breakdown?
Changing worldviews has always been one of the ways societies grow and change, and has been at the root of every major social shift in human history. In the past, however, such shifts took place infrequently, and humanity had the luxury of adjusting to them over the course of centuries.
Now with technology it seems that the manufactured consent can be had in the aftermath of trauma and it is imperative that we review all of the details of an event after the initial shock has ceased.
There are no Crime scene investigations into the violation of cognitive resonance. These crimes have been committed over time and as we see now in our history they are devastating to our world view. A positive, functional modern worldview has to be found now because we are losing our ability to think for ourselves and make decisions without repercussions.