Articles - posted on August 13, 2013 by

Genetic Elect


Today I attended an early showing of the science fiction epic ‘Elysium‘. The film, in my opinion, was slick science fiction and from what I have noticed there is plenty of slick science fiction out there that can be used to deliver all kinds of subtext. The film never really had a moment where it dragged and the message was obvious about what the future holds if we continue on our path of heavy surveillance, overpopulation, bad health care and the polarization between the haves and the have-not’s.

It is also evident in this film that there is a definite distinction between common people who are forced to live in impoverished slums and those rich elite who live in posh surroundings located on a space station suspended above the earth.

As I had said in another published article, the critics love this film however there are some that have said that it is heavy handed politically. I know that bias will determine who the film is calling out as a villain, however the entire system seems to be at fault and the politics involved are far more bio-political or eugenically political rather that forcing a liberal of conservative label on the political message.

The range of diversity on the planet seems to no longer be valued anymore. This is why we declare war on a manufactured ‘other’. This is why, in the film, there is no real war declared against the poor only a barrier that is placed between them and their freedom to lead healthier and more productive lives. It cannot be accomplished in the slums and people are forced to take shuttles to try and enter into the world illegally.

Most of us would hope that our future would consist of being healthier, more intelligent, attractive and having a longer prosperous life.

However, there is a few that are satisfied with just being average, but when it comes to our progeny, most of us want to see our children do better than we did. We want them to have the best future that we can provide.

If we had the opportunity would we choose to enhance their looks, intelligence, athletic abilities and lifespan with customized gene injection or perhaps using designer chromosomes that we can order through a clearinghouse online?

Many decades in the past it was the topic of science fiction, it still is however now the reality is here as researchers have discovered or isolated a gene that can influence a particular human trait. We have heard of genetic research done on animals and the creation of what are called chimeras in the lab.

However, if it has not been claimed in the consensus narrative the secret has been let out of the bag and the genetic genie has been let out of the bottle as fertility clinics have already genetically modified human embryos. We are even about to enter a post-human epoch where not only genetically modified babies will be common but there will also be offspring that could be born with human plus traits and brains that can have that technological handshake with computers and robots.

The human body version 2.0 is allegedly going to be a reality within the next six years where there will be an availability of radical upgrades to maintain longevity, health and well-being. The emerging biotechnology will bridge with nanotechnology in a revolutionary change that will challenge how see the human life span.

Already science has created methods using nanotechnology to augment and ultimately replace failing organs.

By 2030, reverse-engineering of the human brain will have been completed and non-biological intelligence will merge with our biological brains.

In fact, the process is well underway now and while full nanobot rewiring of the brain is not expected before 2020, it has already been reported in peer reviewed science journals that our DNA has been successfully targeted by nanobots “for drug therapy or destruction.”

New psychiatric science is also emerging where human behavior will be managed and in most cases predicted. This means that freewill will be targeted with the usage of drug therapy – or it can be eliminated if we choose to have it that way.

Ethics are being voiced but scientists are happier with opening Pandora’s box feeling that it would probably be better to say I am sorry than to wait for the people and today’s arcane politics to give permission to move forward.

Science will come up with something to somehow dampen negative consequences if they arise.

The question is do people already assume that this science is a malignancy or do they see it as benign and logical step in our evolution?

History has shown that eugenics and genetic selection has had horrific consequences, not to mention the military experimentation on human populations and what that created and still haunts us today.

It was kismet that I stumbled across an old article from 2001 that reported that genetically modified babies have already been born in the United States and that their whereabouts are unknown.

I was cautioned that the story may be a tabloid story but after a lot of searching the story seems to be about a nebulous lab in some remote location closed down and the whereabouts of the babies are unknown.

All in all 30 healthy babies were born and scientists ran a genetic analysis on two of the infants. Tests confirmed the babies inherited their DNA from three adults — two women and one man.

It is now possible for parental engineering of the babies. This is a breakthrough for parents who worry that their children could be born with genetic abnormalities because of a genetic disposition that may cause birth defects.

The future is now and we now see a procedure that empowers “parents to give their children a healthy life, even if it meant giving their offspring traits they themselves could not pass down.

However, the ethical arguments are about mistakes that can be made and there is that murky area about life and conception and whether or not we devalue life when we make genetic changes and then discard the results if they don’t work out.

For example, a recent story out of India about a child that spontaneously bursts into flame sounds like it could be taken from ‘The X-Men’ or the ‘Fantastic Four’.

Doctors are saying that the child Rahul has a rare medical condition where the skin on the child is emitting flammable gas which causes to child to flame up if he is not monitored.

He first caught fire when he was only 9 days old. Doctors are divided on their opinion about the rare medical condition, with some stating that it is a possibility and others completely rejecting it as child abuse. Tests have shown that there is really no reason to suspect such abuse.

Only 200 cases of spontaneous human combustion have been reported in the world in the last 300 years.

Now this may sound outrageous, but India has an extensive genetic experimentation program. In 2007, an Indian research team published their research for creating a strain of bananas that inoculates people against Hepatitis B. The team also successfully altered carrots, lettuce, potatoes, and tobacco to carry the vaccine, but feel that bananas are the most reliable way of transporting the vaccine.

Meanwhile, the United States in 2013 set aside $44.5 million for DARPA to develop “biological systems that cross multiple scales of biological architecture and function, from the molecular and genetic level.” The objective is to create a super soldier.

Soldiers can be enhanced to be more effective in a war zone. Could you imagine a group of soldiers that have the abilities to move like animals or even burst into flame without burning? They could be a secret lethal weapon.

The truth is that we share genes with cats, carrots and apples, and there is nothing carrot-like or human-like to these genes, because those same genes are shared by other organisms too. We just happen to take present genes for projects from some organisms rather than others.

What makes us human is how all of those genes function to make us that way.

What we do as humans intentionally manipulate objects of nature. But not until now have humans been able to intentionally manipulate the biological foundations of human nature.

The question that always arises is should we? However now it is apparent that we already have and so now what do we do with the results.

Is a human life less of a human life if it’s created in a lab or is genetically designed by parents that wanted only the best for their unborn child?

Now that we have at least 30 of these genetically modified babies what should be done with them? Should we accept them as human beings and put away the Frankenstein anxiety or are there still die hard believers that think that this is an abomination and that those who are different should be hunted down and terminated?

The politics of today have not grown substantially enough to procure a bio political dialogue. All we can determine is that there will be the genetically inferior and the genetically elect. The discussion wanes and the politics will have to change because developments concerning the new human genetic technologies have been interpreted in many countries largely through the old dialogue of abortion politics and the underlying social wars.

This is why films like ‘Elysium’ are politically relevant and open the dialogue now to avoid a dystopia later. Who will live and what will the quality of life be if we cannot cure ourselves of cancers and other maladies that will leave families genetically unable to adapt to the new world that awaits us.

The old political arguments will no longer have influence. Therefore, it is an evolutionary imperative that we begin setting the foundation that literally separates and evaluates abortion rights and keeping them apart from genetic and medical research that benefits and enhances life while making clear that we have a moral obligation to prohibit any and all applications of genetic science that open the door to profoundly dangerous and horrible outcomes.


8/13: Genetic Elect | Ground Zero with Clyde Lewis

[…] Ground Zero went to the movies today, but it sure didn’t seem like make believe. ‘Elysium‘ is slick sci-fi about what the future holds if we continue on our path of heavy surveillance, bad health and further polarization between the haves and the have-not’s. Can we change our genes to avoid the coming horrible outcome? Tonight, Clyde Lewis wants to be ‘Genetic Elect‘! […]


All I know, if genetically enhanced children start becoming all the rage here…..

I’m moving to Russia where they aren’t even fans of homosexual propaganda, doubt they’re eating a bunch of genetically engineered foods, and they won’t have the tolerance therefore the need to worry about the “side-effects” of splicing genes in humans….

The dirty psychopaths running this three ring circus are mutant enough for me….

What’s messed up, if they were talking about gene splicing ANIMALS (these animal loving human haters fail to see that humans are in fact animals), the ELF would be reborn, PETA would grow a radical arm that blew up the labs conducting the experiments, but no it’s filthy humans they’re wanting to alter, and the animal lovers would have to concede they’d loved to splice a cuter or more intelligent child….

Just another quick fix, from the “I want it now”, “Don’t they make a pill for that.”, culture we live in….


Anit-Social media….


Anti-* (alcohol, sorry about that…)


Gene-Splicing, and direct computer human interfacing, this whole idea that we can transplant the “essence” of humans into machine…. Bad ideas.

A scientific dictatorship, complete with drugging to compliance….. bad ideas… (Huxley)

Smelling epic failures……

Bad enough the maker and creator, even the one who DETERMINES if and when a human life is a human life is 1 woman, the potential mother, far past bad enough…

Thinking ahead, we’re fuct, read the writing on the wall.

Powerful rich people control science, they don’t pick the brightest most ethical, and they’re highly arrogant, narcissistic, and short sighted…. Look at the captains of industry and their Wall-Street scams…

Nothing good can come from the scientific dictatorship that’s slowly being implemented, and it will fail, disastrously, look at Fukashima…. Look at the Gulf of Mexico massive dead-zone now, look at “slurry-pond” spills Tennessee Valley authority spill some years back comes to mind….. Look at Nestle wanting to totally privatize water….

These guys aren’t thinking long term, they’re thinking short term gains at the cost of everyone, and everything. There are safer fuel sources, not lucrative enough, not as easily controlled by a couple of corporations who have monopolies….

So……. All these things are B-A-D…!….!….!


No we are not close to understanding all the ramifications of just our genetically engineered FOOD!!!!


Had to throw the “I can kill the black boy cuz he ‘scared’ me” rhetoric again…..

Great, that’s why you get turned off…..


“Regulated” or “UN-Regulated”….. Is Clyde a statist?

Even our republic in it’s purest form is just a republic…. Like the “People’s” Republic of CHINA….. or the Weimar Republic……

Nothing good comes of them, but out of destruction, things are created…. The death of a mammal is food to a plant, the death of a plant is food to a mammal….

Besides Clyde, we’re suffering from a horrible case of FASCISM, regulations mean what to whom who has the money or resources to make a difference?


When the “bad people start using it for bad”….

Have U missed the foreign studies that our media doesn’t publish, anything that increases the cancer rate in rats 100 fold (Genetically Engineered Food), is not g-o-o-d…


Don’t argue nonsense then, do you homework before you suggest that we’re 6 years away from mastering genetically engineering even humans, as if the logistics of doing it successfully, without dire remifications are near worked out…


We won’t all be buying your nano-bot pipe dream, just wait till those get hacked….

Wow you’re conceded, or awfully optimistic for what our scientists are capable of, in a positive manner, or manner that’s primarily positive….

“Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food” ―
Hippocrates (yes food can cure cancer, but fast food, or instant gratification mentalities tend not to see it.)


“Cancer is DEAD: Cancer cures from A to Z”

(Wish the original article was still up, was loaded with links to documented scientific studies that support the claims, still most of the stuff could be tracked down independently…….)


Legalize Cannabis, improve life, heal us, there’s a good place to start.


My God Clyde… A dog can lick itself because it can, doesn’t mean it should.

This ideology, is putting man in the position of God, anyone who feels the need to engineer everything, and ignore natures cures, and potentials….

Have fun, either it’s going to go real well, or the fallibility of man, along with the will to subjugate his fellow man, will win out….


It will be there for you, but the new research facility for nanotechnology will be placed in the last segment of rainforest that WAS home to the last good cure…..

And that’s the folly of man, can do ANYTHING “better” than God, and it’s all working out real well.

But this whole free thinking thing out of me, they’ve got a pill for that, will make someone else feel better.

Evaluating eugenics….. and it’s value again, cute…. It’s bad enough the eugenics of class-warfare.


Time stamped, think I’ll write an expose on Clyde, from arguing the murder of a young black youth over (white judge’s sons) FEAR was not “relevant” to debating the “value” of eugenics…… Just get a recording of the audio, screen capture the page, Clyde paints an ugly picture of self….

John King

Wow, Clyde! This makes me wonder…have we stepped onto what really happened tens of thousands of years ago? Is it possible that Mankind genetically modified itself…in a generation of humanity before the age of the Dinosaurs? Or is it more likely Mankind is not as old as we are being led to believe…that mankind really did walk with the Dinosaurs…and the Dinosaurs died off because the flood changed the level of atmospheric pressure the entire world was under?!?

Please…give me a moment to postulate my thought…

If we accept the Bibles story of the Flood, water came from within the Earth and from above the Earth. Picture, if you will, our planet entirely encased by a layer of water…which is above the atmosphere…a layer of oxygen or air. The presence of this extra water layer, found at the furthest reaches of Earths atmospheres, protected the Earth from the Suns dangerous rays…thus giving the Dinosaurs an additional level of atmospheric pressure which literally push oxygen through the epidermal layers directly into the being….and, through less dangerous rays of the Sun and a higher level of oxygen available, also gave longevity to mankind too! This would explain how Adam and Eve and Noah all lived for hundreds of years.

Now, I’m not necessarily saying everything in the Bible is truth…but, as for the flood, I’d have to admit that there are many other civilizations on Earth that have their own stories about a world wide flood…which leads me to believe that this global flood is more than just a story!

That being said…consider the level of knowledge one could acquire, given enough time. It may be within the realm of possibility that a single generation of life could have come up with such a high level of technology…they would seem to be ET’s to us, if we didn’t take certain possibilities under consideration.

I know I ramble a bit….let me try to bring it home for you…………

If my supposition is true, it may very well be true that we are the outcome of a genetic modification that our ancestors from before the days of the flood did to their own genetic makeup. Not taking into account the loss of a second level of atmospheric pressure, we have become far less than what we should be…or could be!

This is just a thought. Do with it as you will.

Love you and your show…Clyde!

God Bless You and Yours,
John K

John King

After reading all of Zeke’s comments…shy of his slam on you, Clyde…all in all, he makes a relevant point.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *