I don’t often attempt to create a conspiracy theory based on what my listeners tell me, but after the calls that I received last night about the Malaysian plane, I was convinced that the media has now been able to successfully stage a scenario where a conspiracy theory can be made about the events that have transpired over the past three weeks.
I want to make sure that I am clear when I say that what I am about to do is present a conspiracy theory. I have to also say that conspiracy theories are pretty much hypothetical in a sense that nothing can be verified, they can only be speculated about with the evidence that has been presented. The evidence presented must be sourced and if you choose to believe you do so at your own risk and at times your own peril.
I want to make sure that we are clear that this is only a conspiracy theory. If you choose to think about it, then I suggest that you do your own research and hopefully you may find something that I have overlooked.
On March 25th, 2014, 53 heads of state met at the Nuclear Security Summit at the Hague in the Netherlands.
It is interesting to note that Israeli Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu was not in attendance; in fact, this was the third summit he has boycotted. This summit has generated a bit of a buzz in the alternative press because of what President Obama said while attending.
He stood at the podium and what he said as raised a flag as a possible hint of what might be happening in the near future. Obama’s words, as Gordon Duff’s article for PressTV reported, were in response to the Dutch Prime Minister Rutte, who “had just finished congratulating Iran on its [nuclear] cooperation, lauding the United States for a diplomatic success.”
Obama then said:
“I continue to be much more concerned when it comes to our security with the prospect of a nuclear weapon going off in Manhattan.”
For some reason, these words have struck an ominous chord on social networks and blogs. This has also sparked my interest in speculating on what was meant and why the summit was buried in the distraction of the missing Malaysian plane.
What doesn’t help matters is the paranoia that has been spread by sources at the highest levels of the US military and intelligence community stating that we should be on heightened alert for the possibility of the missing plane sitting in Pakistan awaiting orders to fly over Israel or the United States and drop a nuclear payload.
During last night’s show on the missing Malaysian 777 plane, I had a number of calls that were saying that “Lieutenant General Thomas McInerney appeared on Fox News to explain how he believed the missing airplane could’ve landed ‘safely’ and ‘intact’ in Pakistan to be used for terrorism in the future,” as the Express-Tribune reported.
I remember that this theory was one of the first theories presented and has probably planted some wicked seeds of an incredible conspiracy that has been weaved for some time. That conspiracy theory is that somewhere in the United States or elsewhere, someone is plotting a nuclear attack on the United States or Israel in order to guarantee world war by the summer of 2014.
In September of 2013, CBS News reported that Lindsay Graham warned South Carolinians about the threat of a “terrorist nuclear attack.” If you recall, Graham said that a “lack of military action in Syria could result in a nuclear “bombing” in Charleston, South Carolina.”
In the meantime, it was also reported internationally that on the same day a nuclear warhead was transferred from Texas to South Carolina without an authorized signature.
The missing Malaysian plane has spun enough nuclear fears and many of the conspiracy theorists have unapologetically dropped an information bomb that has been spreading like wildfire all over the United States.
We can cite Fox News again as being the network that once again has bred the nuclear fear and has given us another piece in what I call the ‘DEFCON puzzle‘. On March 18th, Greta Van Susteren spoke with Joel Rosenberg about his opinions on the missing Malaysian plane.
Rosenberg made the outrageous claim that the Iranians onboard the plane hijacked it and are planning to use it in a possible nuclear attack on Israel.
About a week ago, the Israeli Foreign Ministry shut down all embassies around the world saying that it was all about a salary dispute with their trade union partners. Some are saying that this move is suspicious because there may be a move that will be made by Israel by Passover.
There also seems to be a rumor going around the Internet that Israel has stated that if they are threatened or if they perceive that they are threatened they would not hesitate to use nuclear weapons if necessary to defend Israel.
The mysterious closure of these facilities is generating some conspiracy talk about a project only known as the ‘Samson Option‘ which is a program that smells of a scorched earth policy if anyone decides to kick at Israel.
Christopher Bollyn, a well-known ‘9/11 truther’ who worked with Professor Stephen Jones in getting the word out about his discovery that thermite was used in the demolition of the World Trade Center, has now reported on his website that “plane spotters” are now reporting that Israel has in its possession an identical Boeing 777 2H6 ER parked in a hangar in Tel Aviv.
He claims that it is a doppelganger of the Malaysian plane and that it was flown there in November of 2013.
Here is the exact statement from Bollyn’s site:
“According to reports from plane-spotters, Israel has an identical Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-200 in storage in Tel Aviv since November 2013. The only visible difference between the missing plane and the one in Tel Aviv would be its serial number. What do the Israelis have planned with the twin Malaysia Airlines plane?
By using the twin aircraft they have in storage, the terror masterminds may have a sinister plan for the missing plane to seemingly reappear in a false-flag atrocity. Public awareness of the twin plane in Tel Aviv, therefore, could prevent the evil plot from going ahead.”
This seems to be nothing more than some “nuclear fear breeding” and while it is considered noteworthy we must also consider motive. Is the so-called ‘Samson Option’ a real motive for a false flag nuclear attack on the United States?
Is any of it real?
Coincidences never cease in the world of conspiracy yarns.
On March 27, 2014, the BBC reported:
“The US Air Force has sacked nine mid-level nuclear commanders and will discipline dozens more in a test cheating scandal, officials have said.
Nearly one in five of the Air Force’s nuclear missile officers have been implicated in a ring of cheating on monthly proficiency tests.
Air Force Secretary Deborah Lee James has said the nuclear force is suffering from “systemic problems”.
Commanders of the 341st Wing’s three missile squadrons – each of whom is responsible for three nuclear missiles – were also fired, the Associated Press news agency reports.
Ninety-one missile launch crew members at Malmstrom have thus far been implicated in the cheating scandal, including more than 40 who face disciplinary action that may include dismissal…
It is the latest scandal to hit the US Air Force and nuclear missile force.
Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel had previously ordered a high-level review of the US nuclear forces, saying he was “deeply concerned” about morale and discipline among nuclear officers, while insisting that US nuclear arms were safe.”
Previously, Fox News reported on October 11, 2013: “Maj. Gen. Michael Carey was removed from command of the 20th Air Force, which is responsible for three wings of intercontinental ballistic missiles — a total of 450 missiles at three bases across the country.”
The Associated Press reported that same day that, “the second-in-command at U.S. Strategic Command, Vice Adm. Tim Giardina, was relieved of command amid an investigation into alleged gambling issues. Strategic Command is responsible for all Air Force and Navy nuclear forces.” CBS reported it weeks earlier on September 30, 2013.
All of these events are all pieces in the ‘DEFCON puzzle’ and the fear of a false flag nuclear event happening in the United States is not new. One even wonders if it’s all just coincidence theory brought on by some ‘Dr. Strangelove’ mentality.
Two of my favorite movies are ‘Dr. Strangelove‘ and ‘Fail-Safe‘ and both films illustrate – in different ways – the trauma of mutually assured destruction. The concept of total annihilation was not even thought about until the Cold War began.
Soon films were urging us to take heed the warnings of nuclear destruction and fallout shelters were being built in suburban areas. Nations with nuclear capabilities are now something we are used to hearing about.
However, we have been so desensitized to an all-out mutual destruction that when it is brought up someone who is uncomfortable about the topic will accuse anyone who brings it up of being a doomsayer or being a ne’er do well ‘Chicken Little‘ claiming the sky is falling.
We have all taken for granted that if any nuclear warhead is launched and meets its target, it would most assuredly be from some nation who has an axe to grind with us. We have already been programmed to believe that any attack against our country is a blow to freedom and that those who attack must hate freedom.
It is unfathomable to even think that we could accidentally launch a nuclear weapon or even have a malfunction or breach that could target an American city or even a nation that is considered an ally.
However, movies like ‘Strangelove’ and ‘Fail-Safe’ take these issues head on.
Back in 2007, there was a story that hit the mainstream press about a B-52 bomber that was loaded at Minot Air Force Base with six active nuclear warheads. The bomber flew across the United States and eventually landed safely in Louisiana. The bomber flew for more than three hours over at least five states before landing. It was reported by the mainstream media that a plane with a nuclear payload was flying a “routine mission” from base to base and that the missiles were carefully crated on board and ‘at no time was the public in danger’.
Later, after an investigation, it was found that the public statement was absolutely false.
The cruise missiles were not being shipped inside the plane, but dangling from the underside of the plane. They were, in fact, fully armed and ready for fire. All the pilot had to do was notify a radar navigator to drop the warheads along the route. Each warhead carried a 150 kiloton payload. With six of them on board, the plane had the kill power of 60 times that of Hiroshima – making all claims of a “routine” flight spurious.
If one of the warheads were to have been dropped or if the plane had crashed there would have been a “broken arrow” alert where a loose nuclear warhead could have killed hundreds of thousands of people.
Air Combat Command was on stand down on September the 14th, 2007 to review their emergency procedures.
During the review, there was a dispute over how many bombs were loaded and how many arrived. Some reports claimed that six bombs left Minot AFB, but only five arrived at Barksdale and the munitions squadron commander was relieved of his duties. Crews involved with the mistaken load including all ground personnel were also decertified for handling munitions.
It was then reported that a group called Citizens for Legitimate Government said the six members of the US Air Force who were directly involved as loaders or as pilots were killed within seven days in mysterious “accidents”. This sent up a red flag that a deeper conspiracy was afoot and a broken arrow exists somewhere ready to be detonated.
Once the “all clear, nothing to see here” was issued, Americans went on their daily information diet of reality shows and sports events.
For more than 20 days now, we have been subjected to report after report about the missing Malaysian plane. The media has not discredited or even discouraged that idea that a military false flag is in the works and so now it can only be a hypothetical nightmare that belongs only in the area of conspiracy theory.
The odd thing is that this conspiracy theory has had its roots in what the mainstream narrative wishes that you think long and hard about: The possibility that this is a clandestine military operation that will eventually result in a nuclear conflagration in an area that America will be forced to defend.
Let us hope that it won’t be in our own back yard.