MONOLOUGE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
An increasing number of articles with supposed scientists conjecturing “what if” scenarios where a whited sky by metallic particles “might” help mitigate global warming have appeared online lately.
I have never seen so many articles where scientists at NASA have to explain why spreading trails are in the sky – all while dismissing any and all speculation about chemtrails.
Chemtrail has become a magic word that is now being used to expose so-called conspiracy aggregators that have sounded the alarm about how these trails are affecting the weather and public health.
We are told by all official sources, agencies, and elected officials, that all we are seeing in our skies are “condensation trails”. They say that it is perfectly normal for this “condensation” to stay in the sky for hours or days, widening and spreading until whole horizons are completely blotted out.
They speak about this as if it should be normalized and what we are witnessing is exactly what they say they want to do with geoengineered solar radiation management but they assure us that geoengineering is not actually going on.
Those that choose to believe these blatant lies simply do not yet want to wake up.
There is now quite a large body of literature on geoengineering, and more and more, we are learning about the agenda of the earthmasters that want full spectrum dominance of the planet and the ecosystem.
About two years ago, I was called to do a sit down interview with cameramen and producers for a pilot that was supposed to air on the Destination America network. They wanted to get my views on an incident that took place in the small town of Oakville, Washington in 1994.
Gelatinous blobs of biological material began to rain down over an area of over 20 square miles during a storm. It happened six times in 1994. It happened again during the third week of June 1997.
The substance that fell had a mushy consistency and smelled like human waste. Members of the town became ill with flu-like symptoms when they came in contact with it.
The substance was then sent to a lab for testing. The substance contained human white blood cells. Lab technicians said that the sample had two types of bacteria, one of which could be found in the human digestive tract. The answer was clear; at least it seemed clear enough.
It had to be human waste from an airliner; however, FAA regulations require that waste matter dropped from aircraft be dyed blue. People of the area claim that before their town was hit with the substance there were strange aircraft and Contrail activity over both Oakville and Everett, Washington.
Now keep in mind that this incident happened before there were concerns about possible aerosol trail spraying and the so-called chemtrail hysteria that apparently brought the fringe out of the woodwork pointing at every contrail as a possible “mark” for death.
During the television interview I used the term, chemtrail and I was told that they would prefer that I use the term “lingering” or “persistent” contrail. I told the producers that I had never heard the term before, and they told me about how NASA was actually conducting a study about how lingering condensation trails affected the weather.
In a peer reviewed report from the spring of 2004 NASA reported that their scientists had found that cirrus clouds, formed by contrails from aircraft engine exhaust, are capable of increasing average surface temperatures enough to account for a warming trend in the United States that occurred between 1975 and 1994.
The study was a bit confusing as it adopted a set of description of aircraft trails, aerosol trails, and condensation trails.
This appeared to be deliberate obfuscation imposed by federal agencies on the subject of contrails vs. persistent contrails vs. persistent spreading contrails and cirrus cloud formation.
The greatest lie ever perpetrated and propagated is the lie of the “persistent or lingering condensation trail”. Without knowing any of the related science facts on this issue, anyone with a sense of reason should be able to determine the fact that our skies are being sprayed.
Skeptics of the phenomena assume that people who are chemtrail aware neglect the possibility that what they are seeing are simple condensation trails, however the mere thought of an extensive study carried out by NASA speaks volumes on the effect the trails have on health and the environment.
Our society has been well trained to accept the official narrative on countless issues which is how those in power hide their crimes in plain sight. The fact that so many official explanations are completely contrary to reason and the laws of physics seems not to matter to most of the population, “ignorance is bliss” as the saying goes.
People who look up realize that in the sky above us there is a massive spray campaign that is going on as there are trails that are turned on and off, grid patterns one day and nothing the next in spite of identical atmospheric conditions.
We are now witnessing one jet leaving a trail from horizon to horizon adjacent to another jet at a similar altitude that leaves virtually nothing – trails of completely dissimilar compositions and colors. These plumes behind jets do not match the alignment of the engines themselves causing some of the trails to shoot out to one side of the aircraft. There is also of course the fact that climate science circles and governments around the globe are clamoring for climate engineering to be deployed.
This will be done with more aerosol spraying.
A team of Harvard researchers is preparing a first-of-its-kind field experiment in the hotly-debated area of solar geoengineering, the controversial idea to combat climate change by pumping aerosols into the sky to reflect the sun’s rays back into space.
The study will be the first to actually shoot tiny amounts of material into the stratosphere to study solar geoengineering, although researchers caution they will start with water vapor and won’t exceed volumes over 1 kilogram of any substance.
Yet the concept of intentionally modifying the earth’s atmosphere as a corrective for global warming is highly contentious — it is also a great cover for the continued spraying of simulants and chemicals over populated areas, just to see what happens.
The first stage of the test could occur as soon as next year, using only water and aiming to test the methodology and technology of the experiment itself. As the study progresses, new substances may be introduced and examined, including calcium carbonate, sulfates, or even diamond dust.
They claim that this geoengineering process can lower temperatures and aid in the fight of alleged climate change.
A new study by researchers at the Carnegie Institution for Science attempts to determine just how big the effect from man-made geoengineering would be.
Adding enough sulfate to the stratosphere to block 2 percent of the sun’s light would make the sky three to five times brighter, they report in a paper that will be published in the Journal Geophysical Research Letters.
That is roughly the level of sulfate geoengineering needed to counteract the warming that would result if the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere climbed to 560 parts per million, up from roughly 390 ppm today.
The world might be cooler, but blue skies would become a little less blue, the scientists report. Even remote, sparsely inhabited areas would lie under a whitish sky.
Many places in the United States and Europe have skies that are whitish gray—days with azure skies are rare now in most parts of the globe to geongineering that has been carried out by contracted parties.
The injection of a continuous stream of sulfate particles would lend sunsets a man-made oily afterglow.
What happens when you put a layer of sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere? They scatter light, but they don’t scatter light equally.
Some people might not notice. Others might not care.
But even folks who can’t tell a picture-postcard blue sky from its milky, geoengineered cousin might be able to detect other side effects of using sulfate to cool the planet.
Blocking just 2 percent of sunlight that would normally reach the Earth — the scenario depicted in the study would probably be enough to create measurable drops in energy created by concentrated solar thermal power systems, which rely on direct sunlight.
Meanwhile, a poll released this week by the Brookings Institution suggests that Americans are concerned about the safety and effectiveness of geoengineering.
Sixty-five percent of participants said they somewhat or strongly disagree that if global warming takes place, “scientists would be able to find ways to alter the climate in a way that limits problems.”
A slimmer majority, 45 percent, disagreed with the notion that scientists could develop “atmospheric engineering” methods to cool the planet.
But most of the 887 participants in the survey, 69 percent said they “strongly” or “somewhat” believed the harm from adding material to the atmosphere would outweigh the benefits. The poll carries a margin of error of 3.5 percent.
What was surprising according to Brookings was that there were many people in the survey that were well aware of the lingering trails and that they believe that they cause harm to the environment.
Furthermore, a new study by the University of Wyoming actually counters the claims by NASA that what people are only seeing short-lived, non-persistent contrails (SLNPC), Persistent contrail, non-spreading (PCNS), Persistent contrail, that is spreading (PCS).
NASA defines PCNS as a separate species of artificial cloud from the PCS type. NASA also avoids concluding that a PCS is necessarily evolved from a PCNS. It is, therefore possible that a PSC can either be evolved from a PCNS or appear spontaneously as a “spreading” PCS emission without ever being defined as a PCNS.
However, the University of Wyoming aggregates atmospheric conditions collected at many sites around the US, Europe and beyond. The data above 26,000 feet reveals that conditions for formation of so-called “persistent contrails” due to high relative humidity above 70% are “rare.”
A knowledge of conditions required for formation of persistent contrails above 26,000 feet is inexpensive and sightings can be fact-checked against available atmospheric data in many instances. Although this method does not reveal the content of the presumed geoengineering compound it serves well as a repeatable test to validate the occurrence of a jet aircraft emission of unknown composition and toxicity.
Using NASA’s own data it can be asserted with confidence that a persistent jet trail that remains visible for more than 10 minutes is not primarily water vapor and is far more likely to fit the Oxford dictionary definition of “chemtrail.”
For those of us well aware of this ongoing poisoning of our skies the constant obfuscation within the discussion of geoenegineering is enough to make you sick, as lying, paid-off so called scientists lay out their lying propaganda without compunction.