MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
I have a little truth to share with you all. History has never been clean, it has never been tidy and the fact that we have managed to maintain a modicum of civility between 2011 until now is rare.
Arguably, some will say that there really has not been any civility in the United States; however, I can safely say that we have not edged ever closer to a Civility War in the modern era than we have now.
The idea of American Civility has been debated within the legal world since the early seventies, when judges and lawyers grew concerned with unruly courtrooms and popular impressions that their profession was stocked with crass, win-at-all-cost opportunists and sharks looking for blood.
In the eighties, many colleges adopted codes of civility in order to protect a diversity of viewpoints and insure that campus conversations honored academic freedom.
However, in 1987 something happened that would change the course of the way we receive information. It was the year that we eliminated the Fairness Doctrine, which required broadcasters to honor multiple political perspectives.
I was taught fairness in broadcasting. I spent year learning about objectivity in broadcasting and after 1987 – there were superstars of bias that appeared on different networks and cable started to take sides when Fox News was created. Their slogan was fair and balanced meaning that with the restrictions on fairness lifted – there was certainly no responsibility on behalf of the news media to keep the public informed with thorough unbiased news.
The media realized that they had a special power. It was the power to shape the culture and reverse the meaning and the purpose of the right and left. It was divisive from the beginning and hidden among the ranks were CIA agents and Pentagon officials that were able to weave into the national narrative information that had been hijacked by Neoconservatives and Neoliberals.
The true meaning of what it meant to be liberal was twisted, and the true meaning of what it meant to be a conservative was demonized. The liberals were being told what their issues were by Hollywood limousine liberals and those who followed the blueprint set in stone by Saul Alinsky’s, Rules for Radicals, a book that was dedicated to Lucifer.
An epigraph on the introductory page says: Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.
Neoconservatism was also formed under Luciferian design and was pushed in colleges by a man name Leo Strauss.
Leo Strauss championed the importance of elites creating “unifying myths” against a common enemy. Strauss was a political philosopher from the University of Chicago. He taught students that the prosperous society we were living in contained the seeds of our own destruction. He believed that Western Liberalism led to nihilism.
Strauss believed individual freedom gave people the reason to question everything. Too much individualism would lead to people questioning morality and shared values that held society together.
Strauss claimed that the only way to reverse this type of nihilism would be to have politicians create strong and inspiring myths that everyone could agree upon. He believed that in order for a government to retain control there would have to be certain illusions created in order to restore a sense of order.
Two of the most important myths that needed to be asserted according to Strauss, were myths about religions and myths about nations. Combining the two would give a nation some trumped up destiny to fight against the forces of evil.
Some of Strauss’ students, or students of his students, went on to become conservative policy intellectuals in Washington. Many of them still hold on to the philosophies of Strauss, which oddly enough, are similar to those of Hitler and Mussolini.
Strauss had stated that:
“A political order can be stable only if it is united by an external threat.”
Following Machiavelli, he maintained that if no external threat exists, then one has to be manufactured.
Strauss also advocated governments letting terrorizing catastrophes happen on one’s own soil to one’s own people in order to create a state of heroism with regard to leadership. If people are in a state of panic those in positions of power can suggest anything and everything to “remedy” the crisis.
Now the obvious can be revealed to those who have awakened to the chaos. The true visions of what it means to be Liberal and conservative have been twisted to where overtime a war on civility would take place and people would be disillusioned by their own political interests.
First, it is imperative to understand the difference between the terms right and left. In Europe, the left means communism while the right means socialism, both being big government ideologies.
However, America’s left embraces complete government control, which includes both communism and socialism, while the right strives for complete Libertarianism, campaigning for limited government rule. Those who have not been educated regarding this major difference fall for the narrative that conservatives embrace Nazi attitudes and beliefs; most do not, most don’t understand how they are gradually being pulled into the narrative of sticking up for the darker side of nationalism.
The GOP and Conservatives are painted as partners with these hate groups even though they traditionally all fall on the Left of American politics. The tables have now turned, and we are seeing that the Left is shouting form the rafters that conservatives are bigoted and racist.
Traditionally and before the late 1980’s, this was not at all the case. For most conservatives, it is still not the case as many still favor the conservatism of Ronald Reagan.
It was after 9/11 that the Straussian hijacking shaped right-wing thinking into becoming something that it never was supposed to be.
When we look at Socialism and big government, it used to be embraced by previous Presidents like Woodrow Wilson, and Franklin D. Roosevelt.
If either President was in the White House today, the likes of Robert DeNiro and Maxine Waters would be jailed for sedition. CNN would have been shut down for reporting news for the Resistance. Wilson would have given no quarter. If Roosevelt were alive and sitting in the Oval Office, he would issue a travel ban and would round up every Muslim in the United States. He would also order the mass arrests of anyone involved in Black Lives Matter for attempting to disrupt the function of government.
President Truman, another Democrat, would have probably ordered the bombing of North Korea. President Johnson, another Democrat, would have ordered the assassination of Kim Jong Un and would secretly ordered intelligence operatives to kill his political enemies and detractors.
Usually, the Left claim that they don’t want to say anything that could hurt others or cause violence, while they daily target Christians, conservatives and any other opinion that dares not conform to their accepted “free speech” and “political correct” philosophy.
Furthermore, Maxine Waters now has said that they should take a physical stance against these people including the use of violence and even death. We are already seeing a confrontational attitude on campuses across the country, sometimes ending in physical harm.
The Left blame President Trump – the conservatives blame everything that they claim is liberal clap trap, but the truth is obvious as to what is happening – accept no one will say it.
We are in a Civility War because the powerful who seek globalism want to see America eat itself. We all have appetites and our mouth is watering now for blood and all the pundits are now calling it – they are saying that Civil War is eminent.
It is now that people are convinced that their rights trump yours. People just assume they know better than you and are justified in telling you what to think. Never be afraid to speak your mind or defend your God-given right to do it. You have the right to speak, they do not have the right not to be offended. This will result in name calling like fascist racist, bigot and hater, and that your views are unacceptable. Be quick to point out that the intolerance in this situation is not coming from you. In fact, the hatred being spewed is not yours, but that of your accuser.
The hate is there because the media and the elite love this type of theater, and we are the players. They can drop the curtain at any time and strike the set they have constructed. It is like a sick version of the Matrix or even the Truman show. If you can see outside of the illusion of Right and Left, you can free yourself form lack of civility that has the nation in its grip.
We are watching helplessly as a minority is seizing the social agenda of the Republic.
We are beginning to see how most of America is finding a disconnect with the rapid change in social issues and what is frightening is that the government is expecting a violent blow back.
Fifty-one percent of non-whites, in the United States say they are uncomfortable with the pace of social change. Two-thirds of women also say they are uncomfortable, as are 50 percent of adults under age 30.
Meanwhile, there are a minority of white Americans, mostly Christian right-wing individuals feel they are losing their voice in America. This is sending a signal to the authorities that there is a whole new group of people who are beginning to become disenchanted with how government operates and are creating a campaign that many watchdog groups are claiming is a dangerous ideology.
Polls are clearly indicating that what are perceived in the media to be “social issues”, in reality reflect a much deeper meaning.
Americans are becoming more divided on issues and so we are beginning to see collectivism within the country. Collectivism has always been a tool that would ensure that the Republic would eat itself.
The information that we are all fed is skewed and while they claim it is not fake – it certainly is not good for the mental health of our nation.
The media that claims that they seek facts first, while another claims that they are fair and balanced should know that the fact is that nothing is fair and balanced in America.
There is no balance of civility and this is why we are circling the drain.
Today, civility for the individual, is about not being an asslown. But for the institution, invoking civility is about isolating and controlling those assclowns or using them to push their assclown agendas that no one agrees on.
With social media we have somehow become compelled to take everyone’s grievances seriously, every bitch and gripe in print, every troll and every bully who believes he is powerful acting that way in front of a keyboard is another example of a pusillanimous assclown.
And as the common ground between all of us dissolves into hell, it has become easier to fixate on incivility than to realize whatever ideas rude language might trigger. We don’t care who it may hurt – it is all free speech and when there is a war on civility, there is no respect for the First Amendment when most people do not know what it means to invoke it.
The First Amendment is not a blank check to be uncivil and it is not a lock to protect you from consequences. The press has free speech too and looks at the consequences from their skewed fact checking and bias in what they report.
For those on the right, civility is political correctness by a different name, while those on the left tend to see it as a way of silencing dissent. The left uses it to push their resistance and their extremist henchmen like Antifa use it for their extreme fascist behaviors.
What we all fail to realize is that incivility is there to preserve the oligarchy.
What we are experiencing today is the progressive weakening and demise of many key processes associated with globalization; mostly of a haphazard, horizontal, cross-border, even chaotic nature and their rebirth in new formats, suitably retooled to support world government goals, processes and institutions that strengthen, grow and consolidate. However, it seems that the architects of the New World Order are perturbed by populism and nationalism and see it as a menace to their goals.
We are seeing both the Right and the Left responding negatively to forced transition and little-by-little the weakening of the people will result in surrender.
The most dramatic effect of this transition we are undergoing is the planned end-run eroding of all sovereign nation-states.
In its place, we will have world governmental institutions. This is taking place through a complex, creeping, gradual, crisis-filled and violent process that is erecting legally binding, mandatory, multi- and supra-national bureaucratic entities.
This gradualism has been happening behind the scenes for decades and even with the arrival of President Trump who is this decade’s designated poster boy for hate and derision – the oligarchy is using the turmoil as a distraction and then will decimate it in time and push for a vote of compromise and unity.
America is now officially uncomfortable with social issues – many Americans are being radicalized as their own ideologies are being stifled and many people are seeking refuge in collective groups that share old-fashioned values and see the government as a threat to social sanctity.
It is a conspiracy to change the ideology of America and its social values. This is being done to guarantee a blow back of those individuals that are ready to radicalize and create a reason for the new American police state.
In the 1960’s when New World institutions fought for their place in the hidden government, drastic measures were taken and various traumas were allowed to happen in order to change cultural behaviors. From the assassinations of the Kennedy’s to Dr. Martin Luther King, the American people were being told that change was on the way and that the soft civil war made everything darker before the New Dawn or the New Deal.
The oligarchy is trying it all over again and since we are a nation that no longer values history we just hope and pray that the leaders we have are the bleach that clean out the filth that has been obvious for some time.
But no leader can and no leader will when there is incivility.
It is all because here we are today, willing to massacre each other with personal attacks, baseless accusations, and unfounded stereotypes. Yet, we never even had that moment of facing each other with honor and dignity, saluting one another for a well-fought fight. No, instead we decided to walk away from the victory speech with hatred in our hearts and revenge in our minds.
We set out to destroy our history, change the course, tear down statues and cherry pick The Constitution to justify our rights to mouth off and shoot those who get in our face.
The all out purge will commence, people will be in streets angry, cold and some will be dead. Some will be shot and others will be arrested en masse and put into the REX 84 camps that we all thought were just for the criminal immigrants.
All of the turmoil hardens the resolve for the police state, it ensures the implementation of the surveillance apparatus and will make the safety and sanitized sanity you seek all mandatory and under martial law.
New Jersey has now tightened their strict gun control laws. New legislation gives citizens 180 days to surrender all firearms and magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. If a person should dare to keep their own property, now declared “illegal contraband,” they will be treated as criminals.
Laws like these are ready to be implemented in Texas, Washington and Oregon as well. When a government aims to disarm their citizens, they do so because they see them as the enemy.
The puppet masters of the Deep State have been quite efficient in keeping Americans transfixed so that they can continue to erode civil rights and open vital dialogue for statist, authoritarian propaganda and eventually a newly planned state socialism.
Of course, cultural change where some of the power elite’s key victories lie, takes entire generations to implement. This is why Psy-Ops and propaganda have reached new heights.
They risk manage the entire process, knowing that many pitfalls and surprises are in store for them every day. So for each plan, each stage, and in each geography, carefully structured “Plan B’s” are always in place in some cases, even, plans C, D and E, just in case, which can be triggered if and when needed.
This super government can only be implemented if the people demand it. The way it is engineered is through several shocks to the system, which in turn manipulate and wear down the populace into adjusting their principles for the coming changes.
The idea is to allow the idea of transcendence to die off in the human being, making him more of a beast or an animal, easily controlled and manipulated through trigger phrases, sounds, numeric sequences and other stimuli. The subject is then reborn and reprogrammed to do the will of its master.
Divide and conquer has divided to the point that the ‘conquered’ can no longer be treated as a few mindless minority groups. As Zbigniew Brzezinski, co-founder of Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller once said: “In earlier times, it was easier to control a million people, literally it was easier to control a million people, than physically to kill a million people. Today, it is infinitely easier to kill a million people than to control a million people. It is easier to kill, than to control a million people.”
The globalists want government to god-like and omnipotent and will do everything they can to make that happen.
They first have to beat you into submission by taking over the language and imprisoning you for acting like a moral human being. They make any dissenters completely paralyzed from criticizing them and then just shove through their agendas, waiting to destroy any remaining rebel who tries to stop them.
Now we know how they will accomplish this – with a Civility War, we will all be seen as extremist criminals begging to be controlled by an outside source.