On the heels of the many terrible disasters around the world, we all knew that eventually the apocalyptic militants would rise up and toil away at their political agenda mixed in with their religious agenda and one of the most notorious of all is Pope Francis.

You may or may not know that his holiness, the Pope, actually banged his head as he exited the Pope Mobile in Cartagena which gave him a black eye.

After the accident, he spoke with reporters on a plane about everything from immigration, Climate Change, Trump’s latest measures and the situation in Venezuela.

After being told that his plane will be diverted away from Hurricane Irma, the reporters all broach the subject of man-made Climate Change. One of the reporters pipes up and says “Is there a moral responsibility of those political leaders who refuse to cooperate with other nations by denying that this climate change is man-made?”

The Pope unloaded his views on the subject:

“Those who deny this must ask the scientists: they speak very clearly, they are precise. The other day the news came out of a Russian ship that went from Norway to Japan and crossed the North Pole without finding ice. From a university, they have said that we only have three years “to step back”, if not, the consequences will be terrible. I don’t know if the three years are true or not, but if we don’t step back, we will fall! We can see climate change in its effects, and we all have a moral responsibility when we make decisions. I think that is a very serious matter. We all have our moral responsibility and politicians have their own. Let them ask the scientists and then decide. History will judge on their decisions.”

He then added a biblical reference to further his point:

“A phrase from the Old Testament comes to my mind: man is a stupid man, a stubborn man who does not see, the only animal that falls twice in the same hole. The arrogance and conceit… and then there is the “Mighty Dollar”. Many decisions depend on money.”

The Pope suggested that Climate Change deniers are stupid and stubborn. Nowhere in the conversation did the Pope address the problems facing the church, namely the reported Satanic ritualism, pedophilia, and alleged human trafficking carried out by corrupt priests that the church has seemingly taken a blind eye toward.

What is even more frightening is that The Pope’s sentiment about Climate Change denial echoes the same thoughts as those who are urging laws to be passed to make Climate Change skepticism a criminal offense.

Mark Hertsgaard argued in a September 7th article in The Nation, titled “Climate Denial Is Literally Killing Us,” that “murder is murder” and “we should punish it as such.”

Furthermore, he writes “When the president announced in June that he was withdrawing the United States from the Paris climate accord, I wrote in The Nation: ‘To refuse to act against global warming is to condemn thousands of people to death and suffering today and millions more tomorrow. This is murder, even if Trump’s willful ignorance of climate science prevents him from seeing it.'”

The suggestion that those who run afoul of the Climate Change consensus, in particular government officials should face charges of murder is undeniably an inappropriate response and shows how maniacal and militant people can get.

Which for most people, should be a clue about how the destructive group dynamic involved signals just how cult like this has become.

In an article in the outline, author Brian Merchant stated that “In the wake of Harvey, it’s time to treat science denial as gross negligence — and hold those who do the denying accountable, climate change denial should be a crime.”

Brad Johnson, executive director of Climate Hawks Vote, posted last week on Twitter a set of “climate disaster response rules,” the third of which was to “put officials who reject science in jail.”

The push to prosecute climate skeptics comes even though the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has concluded that it is “premature to conclude that human activities — and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming — have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or tropical cyclone activity.”

“That said, human activities may have already caused changes that are not yet detectable,” said the Aug. 30 statement.

And yet, the calls for jailing and prosecution continue. When do you finally say to yourself that this whole Climate Change political bullying has compromised the effort? when do you extract yourself from this dangerous cult?

Today, I was watching CNN and apart from the hurricane reporting they decided to report about the new Hillary Clinton book, “What Happened.” For those who are unaware Hillary Clinton has written a memoir that has rehashed the failure of her campaign in 2016.

The majority of Democrats are now saying that this once again is dividing up a leaderless party and that many say that they wish she would just shut up and retire quietly.

She is just settling scores and blaming everyone else except her for her loss to Donald Trump.

After a report on Clinton’s criticism of Bernie Sanders, who isn’t ruling out another run in 2020, Rep. Jared Huffman wrote on Twitter: ‘Please Hillary, don’t go there. I supported you. Bernie showed restraint and class and ran an inspirational campaign. Politics is rough sometimes.’

Huffman told Politico: “There is a collective groan,’ he said, ‘whenever there’s another news cycle about this.”

He added: ‘Maybe at the worst possible time, as we are fighting some of the most high-stakes policy and institutional battles we may ever see, at a time when we’re trying to bring the party together so we can all move the party forward.

Once again this is another example of how the political system offered us a myriad of poor choices – we elected one narcissist in lieu of another. Why are we loyal to political parties that have been compromised by the Deep State?

What do you need – a letter signed by the devil telling you that he has taken over and that he is so happy you approve?

In a compelling twist there was a story that was published concerning a letter that was written in “code” by a 17th century nun who allegedly was ‘possessed by the devil’ that shows what happens when someone has a crisis in faith.

Sister Maria Crocifissa della Concezione wrote ‘this system works for no one’ and that humans invented God in the rambling letter.

She believed she had been taken over by the devil who was using her hand to write with in 1676.

‘God thinks he can free mortals,’ it reads, then refers to the river of the underworld saying ‘Perhaps now, Styx is certain’.

The letter was found at a convent in Sicily, where the nun had lived since she was 15.

She claimed she woke up one day and found the letter, with no recollection of who wrote it.

Scientists from the Ludum Science Centre in Catania finally managed to translate the letter, after running it through software on the dark web which is used by intelligence services to break codes.

It uses Latin, Ancient Greek, the runic alphabet and Arabic to try and make sense of the characters and came up with some decipherable phrases.

Researchers said the nun was known to scream and faint at the altar of Palma di Montechiaro convent, saying the devil was trying to make her serve evil rather than good.

Well, at least she was aware of it and felt that her loyalty and faith were gravely compromised by actions she witnessed in the church.

Maybe the devil was trying to tell her something – maybe this is a lesson for all of us.

There is a dialogue in Plato’s Republic where Socrates and his friends are talking about the nature of different social, religious and political systems and how they change over time and how one form of government or even core beliefs can slowly evolve into another form; one that over time would be unrecognizable and extremely different than it was before.

The themes of the enemy within in the political spectrum and in the sacred realms of the various religions have often bred the suspicious phantoms that many gave labeled the fallen ones or the demons.

It begins to become more and more evident that we invite the demons and evil spirits into our world by not controlling our bloodletting, our xenophobia, 0our militant bullying and our ever increasing need to find a scapegoat.

The mind is a very fragile thing, it can be broken open and destructive thoughts can be placed into the collective consciousness or zeitgeist.

A possession of the masses is very easy to achieve.

Watch the news. Read a paper, the Bible, the Koran and the Talmud. Look at all the things God did and does today.

He smites the disobedient, wiping out whole cities and peoples, flooding the world, and torturing innocents just to see if they love him enough, killing babies. He roasts people in Hell for all eternity, sending tsunamis, floods and earthquakes that wipe out thousands of innocent people.

As it’s often been pointed out, these are not the actions of a sane human being, let alone a loving, well-adjusted deity. Yet God we hear is in control. Could it be that we are being lied to? That some other “god” has been conjured to be in control?

It’s often said that the greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he doesn’t exist. Isn’t it more likely that the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he was God? Wouldn’t that be the most frightening conspiracy of all time?

Could it be possible that while we are awaiting an Anti-Christ to be named, the position has already been filled and the task now is to make religions political strongholds rather than keeping them sacred and hold fast to the idea that there need to be a modicum of reverence with regard to God and his purpose.

I know that many will feel uncomfortable with this discussion because there are some that think that bringing up and this particular “what if” may engender a sense of disloyalty but why should anyone be part of any group or collective that has been gravely compromised and changed from its original purpose.

It is now far beyond the realm of reality to assume that there could be a world where other interests of the United States could be served. There are other more dire problems that can be solved within religion and politics without having to rehash things we have no control over.

We must recommit to a moral imperative and social cohesion instead of creating emotional arguments and violent solutions that compromise the frame work of something that was meant to be good and progressive.

The revolution of faith and truth seems to be deteriorating as political paranoia and megalomania persist and the omnipotence of a creator is being replaced with the false omnipotence of a destructive group dynamics.

We are being beguiled into choosing just who is delivering the correct narrative for our own doom.

Do we leave it up to the churches to drive home the eschaton that has been spoken of for two thousand years?

Do we listen to the doomsday cultists that believe that it is better to sacrifice yourself for the greater good and survival of man in these times of revelation? Or do we now believe a government that for 30 years has warned us of environmental collapse and has decided now to give us the dark-and-foreboding extinction protocol in order for us to fearfully hand over our money so that they can save the planet through geoengineering?

The truth is that they most likely will not help the planet at all. The politics of pseudo science is now going the route of doomsday cult preachers and the fear I have is that they will win as we go from America to the well-organized and well-groomed ‘Americult.’

The apocalypse is big business for political leaders and if the religious clerics and the cult doomsday prophets haven’t convinced you, Nobel Prize-winning scientists are now conspiring to tell you that yes the world is ending, that they own the antidote and that the only way to avoid it is to give them the ability to redistribute the wealth of the world.

The notion of world control is becoming so obvious now and the way they want to do it is the old tried and true way of scaring everyone into believing that they have no power at all and that the elite have some magic formula to tranquilize the environmental monster that they have taken years to construct and unleash.

An abstract cause is now more powerful, than the humans it may hurt. We can now say that religions, political affiliations and even science have been compromised.

When do we acknowledge this and say that we do not want to participate in anything that is corrupt and that it is time to quell the militant radicals who act on emotional baggage, rather than fact.

I really don’t know if any of these sounds dangerous to you, but it is. We have been warned by a zealous mainstream media that conspiracy theories are dangerous.

However, they are only dangerous if they are supported by governments and by globalists with agendas that are out to devalue you and prop up them.

Corrupt religions, egotistical technocrats, science and narcissistic politics are a bad combination. If you really want to see a doomsday scenario, they would be the first to carry it out, and they would do it in the best interest of the god they worship.

Now, do need a letter from the devil to tell what god that is?