Many people are not aware that when Barack Obama told that there would be change in the United States, we had no idea that change would be this bizarre. No one would have believed that everything America stood for 30 years ago has been tranquilized and as the Constitution hung by thread, we did not realize just how thin that thread was.

We are watching helplessly as a minority is seizing the social agenda of the Republic.

We are beginning to see how most of America is finding a disconnect with the rapid change in social issues and what is frightening is that the government is expecting a violent blow back.

Fifty-one percent of non-whites, in the United States say they are uncomfortable with the pace of social change. Two-thirds of women also say they are uncomfortable, as are 50 percent of adults under age 30.

Meanwhile, there are a minority of white Americans, mostly Christian right-wing individuals feel they are losing their voice in America. This is sending a signal to the authorities that there is a whole new group of people who are beginning to become disenchanted with how government operates and are creating a campaign that many watchdog groups are claiming is a dangerous ideology.

Polls are clearly indicating that what are perceived in the media to be “social issues”, in reality reflect a much deeper meaning.

Americans are becoming more divided on issues and so we are beginning to see collectivism within the country. Collectivism has always been a tool that would ensure that the Republic would eat itself.

In his Brave New World Revisited, Aldous Huxley described a society in which “the first aim of the rulers is at all costs to keep their subjects from making trouble.” He described a likely future: “The completely organized society… the abolition of free will by methodical conditioning, the servitude made acceptable by regular doses of chemically induced happiness.”

He predicted democracies would change their nature: elections, parliaments, and courts will remain but the underlying substance will be non-violent totalitarianism, quite frankly a socialist state and quasi fascism where the populace would demand their chemical and physical enslavement.

He also said that democracy and freedom would be the theme of every broadcast and editorial — but democracy and freedom in a strictly non-literal sense. Meanwhile the ruling oligarchy and its highly trained elite of soldiers, policemen, thought-manufacturers and mind-manipulators will quietly run the show as they see fit. The people once again would not question it. The majority would demand their police state welfare society out of fear, long term brainwashing from media, and from the drugs and preparations they would be given on a daily basis.

What we are experiencing today is the progressive weakening and demise of many key processes associated with globalization — mostly of a haphazard, horizontal, cross-border, even chaotic nature — and their rebirth in new formats, suitably retooled to support world government goals, processes and institutions that strengthen, grow and consolidate. No doubt, Big Brother is definitely here, and he means to stay.

The most dramatic effect of this transition we are undergoing is the planned end-run eroding of all sovereign nation-states.

In its place, we will have world governmental institutions. This is taking place through a complex, creeping, gradual, crisis-filled and violent process that is erecting legally binding, mandatory, multi- and supra-national bureaucratic entities.

H.G. Wells was the author of a book called, The Open Conspiracy. This book was an expose on what the elite were planning for the future and how a “Fabian” socialism would gradually take over the world. Creating a New World Order that would replace world religion and world government.

He stated that it all would be replaced by collectivism. He stated that collectivism would kill religion and old forms of government by replacing it as the ideology of the New Age, ushering in a new government.

Collectivism is a term used to describe any moral, political, or social outlook, which stresses human interdependence and the importance of a collective, rather than the importance of separate individualism: in other words, defining one’s self or one’s work by a group or collective, rather than by one’s own individuality.

American sovereignty and individualism are dying – America is starting to eat itself.

In America today, nothing is sacred.

This new reality may have significant political implications in the US, not least of all, for the upcoming 2016 Presidential election. Indeed, the wheels of change are in motion, but maybe not necessarily in the direction everyone thought.

America is now officially uncomfortable with social issues, many Americans are being radicalized as their own ideologies are being stifled and many people are seeking refuge in collective groups that share old fashioned values and see the government as a threat to social sanctity.

It is a conspiracy to change the ideology of America and its social values. This is being done to guarantee a blow back of those individuals that are ready to radicalize and create a reason for the new American police state.

When the words radicalize are used in the media – it has become a point of Newspeak to refer to Muslims who wish to join groups like ISIS.

General Wesley Clark offered his bright idea of identifying “the people who are most likely to be radicalized” and throwing them in concentration camps.

“We’ve got to cut this off at the beginning. …In World War II if someone supported Nazi Germany at the expense of the United States, we didn’t say that was freedom of speech, we put him in a camp, they were prisoners of war. So, if these people are radicalized and they don’t support the United States and they are disloyal to the United States, as a matter of principle fine. It’s their right and it’s our right and obligation to segregate them from the normal community for the duration of the conflict. And I think we’re going to have to increasingly get tough on this.”— Wesley Clark

His words went virtually unquestioned by the mainstream media. There was also a small number of United States citizens that thought that Clark’s words were aimed primarily at Muslim Americans .

That of course, is naive.

What General Clark was advocating is preventive detention. Based on what we believe someone thinks, Clark wants to arrest and detain anyone the authorities identify as being insufficiently loyal to the State.

Clark knew that his statements would be misconstrued because of how vague they were and that comments were made after the Chattanooga shooting. However the Chattanooga shooting of military staff at a recruitment center by a so called Radical Muslim is sandwiched by two shootings carried out by white Christian Americans.

Dylann Roof was indicted on 33 counts of hate crime in the aftermath of the 9 church goers he gunned down in Charleston South Carolina and now John Russell Houser from Alabama who shot and killed two women and wounded nine others at a Lafayette, Louisiana movie theater.

Dylann Roof was a white Christian extreme racist and reported to be a Lutheran.

John Russell Houser or Rusty Houser, according to authorities was an outspoken conservative Christian extremist who praised white supremacist and anti-gay organizations and espoused right-wing, anti-government conspiracy theories. He also was an outspoken supporter of the Westboro Baptist Church.

You should see these shootings as a response to uncomfortable social change.

If you aren’t noticing, the media is and it is being pointed out that there is a trend in America. That is more extreme right wing Americans are angry and that the blow back is from radicalized white Christian Americans.

In the response to the recent shootings, the mainstream media has been attempting to persuade us that Muslims aren’t the ones committing terrorist acts in the United States. They are pointing to statistics that radical right wing disenfranchised white male is now the “lone wolf” in many of the shooting cases and that Americans only react to Muslim attackers.

The media is also pushing the agenda that defending ourselves with guns is more dangerous than simply allowing ourselves and our loved ones to be slaughtered by these extremists.

Keep in mind that the statistics they use are being provided by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which of course is seldom objective and has a known agenda.

Now with these reports in mind can we now realize the impact of what General Wesley Clark said about those he wishes to segregate from what he calls normal Americans?

“There are always a certain number of young people who are alienated. They don’t get a job, they lost a girlfriend, their family doesn’t feel happy here and we can watch the signs of that.”—Wesley Clark

According to a recent poll, it is not just young Muslims that are alienated the majority of Americans are alienated by abrupt social changes in America.

Americans who see themselves on the losing side on high-profile debates about gay marriage, abortion, and immigration are, not surprisingly, most negative about the nation’s direction on social issues.

Polls indicate that the majority of America is on the verge of social breakdown.

A Washington Post-ABC News poll finds a large majority of Americans are unhappy with where the nation is headed on social issues.

Sixty-three percent of people say they are uncomfortable with the country’s overall direction on social issues these days; four in 10 feel “strongly” uncomfortable about the nation’s changes. 80 percent are uncomfortable with the nation’s direction on social issues. A similar 79 percent who oppose the Court’s decision to legalize same-sex marriage in all states say they are uncomfortable, as are 76 percent who oppose efforts to ban Confederate flag displays on government property.

Now, does anyone see the psychological operation working? Can we all see that this is a trap to create suspicion and paranoia in America? This cunning plan is working and many Americans are wondering who is behind it.

All this is brought about by the hidden hand behind the scenes that implements gradual cultural change and political change through obfuscation. Political change, in turn, is tied to the “democratic system” that puts politicians in power for several years at a time and when something goes really wrong, drastic actions must be taken.

Many of us know of the past brutal assassination plans of the hidden hand. In the 1960’s when New world institutions fought for their place in the hidden government, drastic measures were taken and various traumas were allowed to happen in order to change cultural behaviors. From the assassinations of the Kennedy’s to Dr. Martin Luther King, the American people were being told that change was on the way and that the soft civil war made everything darker before the new dawn or the new deal.

The puppet masters have been quite successful since the 9/11 attacks to keep Americans transfixed so that they can continue to erode civil rights and open vital dialogue for statist, authoritarian propaganda and eventually a newly planned state socialism.

Of course, cultural change where some of the power elite’s key victories lie — takes entire generations to implement. Here is where Psy-Ops have reached new heights.

They risk manage the entire process, knowing that many pitfalls and surprises are in store for them every day. So for each plan, each stage, and in each geography, carefully structured “Plan B’s” are always in place in some cases, even, plans C, D and E, just in case, which can be triggered if and when needed.

In Dr. John Coleman’s book The Committee of 300, it is documented that there have been plans in the works to socially engineer the populace into accepting a “controlled super-state.”

This super government can only be implemented if the people demand it. The way it is engineered is through several shocks to the system, which in turn manipulate and wear down the populace into adjusting their principles for the coming changes.

The idea is to allow the idea of transcendence to die off in the human being, making him more of a beast or an animal, easily controlled and manipulated through trigger phrases, sounds, numeric sequences and other stimuli. The subject is then reborn, and reprogrammed to do the will of its master.

Divide and conquer has divided to the point that the ‘conquered’ can no longer be treated as a few mindless minority groups. As Zbigniew Brzezinski, co-founder of Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller and puppet master of Barack Obama once said : “ In earlier times, it was easier to control a million people, literally it was easier to control a million people, than physically to kill a million people. Today, it is infinitely easier to kill a million people than to control a million people. It is easier to kill, than to control a million people.”

Now we know how they will accomplish this.. creating an environment where America will eat itself.