CHILDERMAS 2012: BABY CIPHER

When I try to determine what may happen in the future I often look at the commentary and warnings that have been portrayed in our past literature. There have been authors who have developed stories that build upon the thought of a future unfulfilled utopia that often devolves into the familiar dystopia thesis.

The dystopia thesis always includes the devaluation of life. It also includes the robbing of virtue from the innocent and the idea that the children are sacrificed if not physically but spiritually in many and all forms.
Reproductive laws are put into play, restrictions on what kind of children are to be brought into the world and whether or not the child will fit in genetically and or mentally into the dystopic world order.

It is often titillating to read and discuss the works of Orwell, Asimov, Bradbury, Clarke, and Huxley because many things that they talked about seem to be coming to pass in our present.

It is truly a “Brave New World,” and those who are coming into it need to be brave in order to survive.

We are on the verge of becoming the eugenically aware society spoken of in Huxley’s book. Societies where families are non-existent, spiritual values are depleted, and the birth process becomes a sterile laboratory exercise.

There were two shocking stories that I was aware of this week that I had to share with my audience because it once again hardens my resolve about how dystopias are formed and how innocence is sacrificed for some scientific discovery, for what can be called an alchemical greater good.

I was reading a shocking story out of Russia where 248 fetuses were found in the Central Russian forest near the city of Nevyansk stuffed into four blue plastic recycling barrels.

At first, the fetuses were believed to be legally aborted at 12 weeks but have since been assessed as being as old as 26 weeks. Some, investigators say, had been preserved in formaldehyde for as long as 10 years before being dumped in the woods like trash.

Theories about where they came from abound everything from stem cell research to cosmetic testing to much worse. Professor Aleksandr Teplyashin of the Human Stem Cells Institute in Moscow said, “This looks like some sort of thriller where organs were removed from fetuses to extract essences that theoretically can be used to rejuvenate people.”

Another Russian doctor Olga Spirina had an even more sinister idea: “These fetuses could have been the product of cloning, despite its universal ban, and that’s why they were thrown out like that since these were not future human beings but half human, half artificial creatures.”

The fetuses were apparently numbered and catalogued like test subjects and it was apparent that the dead children were used in some sort of experimental procedures.

The theory that was offered that the fetuses were used for rejuvenation experiments echoes a similar story that we covered where about Thousands of pills filled with powdered human flesh were discovered by customs officials in South Korea.

It was reported that the capsules are in demand because they are viewed as being a medicinal ‘cure-all’. They are marketed as stamina boosters and a product of China.

The pills are made from babies that either are aborted or delivered still-born.

The tiny corpses are then bought, stored in refrigerators before they are removed and taken to clinics where they are placed in medical drying microwaves.

As for the possibility of cloning and the association with eth dead fetuses it is now fashionable despite the universal ban to offer cloning and or genetic designer babies in some parts of the world. The ones that are rejected wind up in barrels somewhere in a forest forgotten.

Cloning and genetic engineering have been available for the parent for a while now. There are labs like Illumina that do genome sequencing for both humans and animals and with a drop of blood can determine many things about an unborn infant. There is also genetics that can allow for the creation of sperm without the need for a male. These procedures are new and are still being tested all over the world.

Parents will have more choices as to what kind of child they will bring into the world and many of them will use science and new birth methods to bring in genetically perfect children.

This could easily allow people to justify new prejudices and to reaffirm their social, political, and economic power. It could also easily allow a further dehumanization process that has already rooted itself in our society.

Parents are already thinking that just having progeny is enough. They take for granted that what they don’t teach their children, the system will. However what the system teaches is unfortunately similar to what Huxley warned us about.

The strict class structure that was in Brave New World had the Alphas at the highest and the Epsilon on the lowest end. Children are conditioned by the system or “world state” to think and act only as a member of their class, rather than as an individual. The family values are dissolved and the idea of parenting becomes improper.

The Alpha Double plus babies eventually grow to rule the world and will continue to carry the charge of being the wealthy class while the Epsilon Minus will continue to be the workers. It sounds so impotent and cold, however the classes are dividing today little by little and with genetic engineering we will be able to divide ourselves more so than we already have.

We begin to see each class having its own sub clique of conformist behavior that lacks spirituality and responsibility. Families could be eliminated entirely since the system will take the baby from birth and care for it as the parents continue their quest for material and carnal pleasures.

Our choices will be determined through suggestions given to us through media and consensus myths and whims that may or may not hold true. This could very well determine the new value system.

We already are beginning to associate intelligence with power and the “Social Darwinist” belief that intellect and genetics have a lot to do with those who are “gifted.” We are falling into the destructive course of believing that there is a “natural” leader that comes from good “breeding stock.”

This already sends the message to some people that it is easier to give up because there will always be the Alphas and they are predetermined to rule over us.

We are already thinking that the poorer kids or the Epsilon group are already going to commit crimes and so why bother helping them? They seem to be doomed from the start. We see ourselves grasping at straws when we develop the theory that there has to be a genetic code for kids who become violent, or that kill their classmates.

Others try to see past genetics and lean on the crutch of unseen forces such as Satanic influences when genetics and psychology fail to demonstrate in their minds a sound reason for this behavior. The solutions include corporal punishment, imprisonment, and execution.

We are currently focusing our attention again on a suspect in a crime where people were shot while attending a movie in Aurora Colorado. It was determined that 12 people were killed and scores more were injured during the rampage. James Holmes has been charged with 24 counts of 1st degree murder — two counts for each of the 12 people he shot and killed during the “Dark Knight” massacre in Colorado on July 20. He was also charged with 116 counts of attempted murder.

However now there is a debate on whether or not there was a 13th murder victim. Ashley Moser mother of 6-year-old Veronica, who was the youngest killed in the theater suffered a miscarriage. Her unborn baby died as the result of Moser’s extensive critical injuries.

Authorities have said they will not charge Holmes for the death of the unborn baby. Karen Steinhauser, currently an adjunct professor at the University of Denver, told the media that Homicide charges only apply to those “who have been born and alive.”

The question is now whether or not this is an injustice.

It also poses the question as to whether or not this is a condoning of infanticide.

Colorado has not adopted the Unborn Victim of violence act which recognizes the unlawful killing of an unborn child as homicide in at least some circumstances. There are 36 states that will charge a suspect with murder when an unborn child in utero at any stage of development, regardless of viability” as a “person” and “human being” is killed or dies because of the actions of the suspect for purposes of the state laws dealing with murder, manslaughter, criminally negligent homicide, and assault.

This leaves us wondering about where life begins in a more tragic and darker sense. It is more fodder for the right to life organizations, and it can’t be condoned or it appears that infanticide whether in the womb or out by crazed killers can be ignored and the victim tallies can not be calculated in potentiality and what the child who was killed might have been and the accomplishments that may have been had with a solid family unit. Especially a family unit that has been now completely wiped out in the case of Ashley Moser.

Lip service has always been paid to children because they do not vote. While kissing babies has always been the proven technique of a political scoundrel the ignoring of infanticide should be an issue in the case of Ashley Moser.

However child sacrifice has never really died. It just takes on different forms, from sending young people off to fight needless wars, to negelect and starvation that seems to be a plague on the world.

In antiquity the consensus anxieties were released by sacrificing children to a horned god called Molech. It was a sacrament to the gods for a guarantee of prosperity, health and safety.

These sacrifices of children have not stopped nor have the rituals to Molech. They
continue in the present and they are done with the absence of compassion and care.
There is no guilt form the leaders and they continue to break bones, and draw blood as
they pave the New World Order over the bodies that were unfortunate enough to be in
the way.

Who will speak for the Children of the Brave new World?

Innocent bystanders aren’t as innocent as the pretend to be.