Don’t Tread On Me - The Truth About Health Care Reform And Global Sustainability
I waited until the dust settled a bit before I decided to talk about Obama care and how it seems that a number of people are completely ignorant of what just happened when the Supreme Court gave its blessing to it. I was reading a number of blogs and forums where people are screaming about how this has pushed us towards socialism. This is not socialism that we are witnessing. It is planned fascism. It is not a blessing nor is it socialized medicine in fact socialized medicine would be preferable to what has just happened.
Socialized medicine would mean that everyone would pay into a medical system and that everyone would benefit equally from it. However, what is happening now is that you will be forced to buy something. You will be required to purchase a product.
Forcing you to buy a product is not socialism; it's corporatism by government mandate. It once again is corporatized mandated coercion. Always remember what Mussolini said about fascism. "Fascism should rightly be called Corporatism, as it is the merger of corporate and government power."
The bi partisan bickering and the left wing praise should be called out. It is time to realize that we the American people are fools if we are using our partisanship to either praise or ridicule this desperate act of corporatized force.
What is beginning to irritate me is how we always have to endure this bipartisan style of demagoguery with every push button social issue. Americans get suckered into it and when cornered about why they believe certain things about the issue always find themselves quoting some talking head they saw on Fox or MSNBC.
It is also evident that Americans are incapable of any kind of rational discussion or even take the time to care about anything except when cued by their partisan controllers or faced with imminent disaster. It really seems to be the norm now – and the norm is what is going to hurt us in the long run. A reactionary response in the Hegelian dialectic makes everyone look foolish and desperate. Desperation breeds a lot of bad decisions.
It is difficult to have a conversation with anyone about news or events around the world without having to deal with a “political creep.” To many people politics is everything and the discussion sickens when someone can turn an opinionated dialogue into political diatribe.
There's nothing liberal or conservative about fixing roads, supporting public safety and delivering city services. There is nothing Republican or Democrat about fire and police services. However there is always someone who can make them into politically biased issues.
The Military can’t have a political bias; however you would bet they do considering a lot of conservatives are pro military.
Schools are often non political and non religious, however there has to be a lobby to include both and we wonder just how our children become indoctrinated with overwrought television specials about the first lady or the president. Sometimes we see videos on you tube that show adoration to our leaders by Children who are forced by their teachers to do so.
The act is reminiscent of the propaganda films of Nazi Germany or of the presentations performed in North Korea or in the Former Soviet Union where children praise “dear leaders” as externalized saviors.
Recently the First lady, Michelle Obama said her husband’s efforts to democratically organize people to be responsible citizens is similar to what Christ and his followers do.
“It’s kind of like church,” Obama said. “Our faith journey isn’t just about showing up on Sunday for a good sermon and good music and a good meal. It’s about what we do Monday through Saturday as well, especially in those quiet moments, when the spotlight’s not on us, and we’re making those daily choices about how to live our lives.
“We see that in the life of Jesus Christ. Jesus didn’t limit his ministry to the four walls of the church,” she said. “He was out there fighting injustice and speaking truth to power every single day. He was out there spreading a message of grace and redemption to the least, the last, and the lost. And our charge is to find Him everywhere, every day by how we live our lives.”
Michelle Obama, who is not a regular churchgoer, said citizenship like the practice of faith is “not a once-a-week kind of deal.” When in doubt about what political ploy you can sell, always rely on Jesus as the buzz word that no one would dare question. Of course there are plenty of apologists that will step out of the shadows to keep anyone from misinterpreting a willful breaking of the 11th commandment.
Utilizing God to gain power or control or those who use Christianity to gain power are dangerous people indeed. Throughout history religion has been used to control the masses and gain political control and influence. Even today, politicians who flaunt their "Christian" life are violating this passage, because they are explicitly using God's name to further their own careers and agendas.
Religion and Politics are said to be anathema in any conversation and for some reason our moral guardians are beyond the yolk of criticism for even trying to bold spindle and mutilate everything in a political religious context. It’s not enough for them to quote God, but they play God because they think they are God. They want control of your spirituality, what you eat, who you have sex with, and your health.
It looks as if anymore they will break every law to do just that – or enact a law so they can avoid the criminality of heir actions.
I am fed up with self proclaimed superior intellectuals that condemn anyone who speaks critically of Obama, Bush or any one of the criminals that are in Washington D.C. I want to know if these logical thinkers don’t believe that there are people in government that conspire to do anything that is illegal. Have we lost our intellectual maturity to the point of just accepting what we are told? Is history something we can throw out and are we comfortable with repeating?
Take for example the health care reform.
Hillary Clinton unveiled her new health-care plan when her husband was president, and Republicans attacked it as socialized medicine.
Republicans are screaming bloody murder now over Obama and the health care reform act. They want to rally, sue, send death threats anything that can cause civil disobedience because they believe in the slippery slope of Marxism and that this is one step closer to securing America as a communist gulag. They tend to believe that this has all been cooked up by Obama and that he single handedly is selling us out.
History on the other hand paints a very different picture.
Thirty six years ago a health care plan that was far more socialist was proposed by Republican president Richard M. Nixon. Nixon introduced his Comprehensive Health Insurance Act on Feb. 6, 1974, days after he used what would be his final State of the Union address to call for universal access to health insurance.
He told America “I shall propose a sweeping new program that will assure comprehensive health-insurance protection to millions of Americans who cannot now obtain it or afford it, with vastly improved protection against catastrophic illnesses,” The Nixon proposal did not require people to be insured.
Two years ago I warned Americans that Obama’s health care proposals were not a ploy for socialized medicine, but a guarantee that United States would be under the microscope of a tax funded medical surveillance state. In fact the passage of the act is quite obviously part of the way our government survives on disaster capitalism. Thriving on pain and suffering and punishes those who do not have adequate health insurance.
The Nixon proposal had favor with the American People because it would not come from tax dollars but from business and there was no individual mandate. Time magazine gave it good reviews but it was voted down by democrats led By Ted Kennedy.
The irony is that while Ted Kennedy voted down the Nixon Bill, nearly forty years later he would die of brain cancer and the Democrats would attempt to name their health plan after him calling him a champion of health care reform.
Nobody called Nixon a champion of health care reform. He had his own troubles. Watergate ruined him and he resigned as the president some months later. This illustrates that the idea of health care for all had been proposed by a republican President and shot down by Democrats stalling the process. A lot of his ideas have been used in the Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and Obama health care plans. Now Republicans are shooting down the plan that was lifted and modified from the republican president and championed by the Democrats.
This new health care plan however has a lot of things in it that many Americans really don’t understand. No one has read the nearly 3000 pages of this piece of reform and the purpose of its passage now is highly suspect.
Health plans proposed by Presidents Harry Truman, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton also failed. Every time, the criticism was the same: They amounted to socialized medicine. So what is at stake now besides unconstitutional individual mandates and the illusion of universal health care?
Bottom line is this new healthcare reform is going to be a new tool to inflict pain on the American people and open them up to more surveillance and monitoring. Medical records will now be more open to investigation by big brother. This is not some paranoid theory, but a fulfillment of what Obama adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski wrote in his famous signature book “Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technotronic Era.
“It will soon be possible to assert almost continuous control over every citizen and to maintain up-to-date files containing even the most personal details about health and personal behavior of every citizen, in addition to the more customary data. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. Power will gravitate into the hands of those who control information.” Furthermore he states: “These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities. Power will gravitate into the hands of those who control information. Our existing institutions will be supplanted by pre-crisis management institutions, the task of which will be to identify in advance likely social crises and to develop programs to cope with them.”
Obama announced at the beginning of 2009 that he was going to invest some 50 Billion dollars in Electronic Medical records software. He claimed it would save us $10 Billion in health care costs. It also confirms that his staff headed by Brzezinski is actually following the plan as outlined years earlier. Access to health care records gives authorities the ability to implement eugenics directives.
Brzezinski who co-founded the Tri-lateral commission had illustrated plans to create a “New International Economic Order.” Its current statement has morphed into fostering a “closer cooperation among core democratic industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system.
The Global plan is for all countries to live on the level of third world nations. Economic sustainability can be achieved through a process known as “end game” strategies. Which include controls on ecological systems such as food, water and air. The agenda would severely limit water, electricity, and transportation – even deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas, it would monitor all lands and people through tracking and scientific measures such as biometrics and eugenics. Medical record keeping and unlimited access to your personal medical history gives the state control over what they feel you need in order to live. Your life and well being will be based on average criteria. You must understand that these provisions have to be put into play because in the future the puppet masters have already planned an event where they will be able to create wealth from an unhealthy welfare state.
What is really happening is that it is now expedient that government maintain a database in order to enforce without warning policies that would be similar to the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act. The next phase in this health care law is that upon the declaration of a "public health emergency", governors and public health officials would be empowered to:
Force individuals suspected of harboring an "infectious disease" to undergo medical examinations. Track and share an individual's personal health information, including genetic information. Force persons to be vaccinated, treated, or quarantined for infectious diseases. This includes arresting, imprisoning and forcibly examining, vaccinating and medicating you and your children without your consent. The Government will not be held liable if these actions result in your death or injury.
With a health care plan in place the government wants plausible deniability when their cure and solutions fail. They want no liability and no excuses. Either way you can lose. Nothing is sure. The future culling of the populace will be unbelievably accomplished by the hands of the doctors. It is part of the plan for global culling for the cause of sustainability. It has been discussed in various UN meetings and recently at the Rio +20 summit. The issue of global sustainability is real and the solutions are all based in mortality rates, vaccine distribution and reproductive freedom.
It is no coincidence that on various news shows the Octo-mom Nadya Suleman and the Dugger family’s 18 children were used as examples of how Super sized families are likely to be responsible for nearly 400,000 metric tons of greenhouse gas causing carbon dioxide emissions.
The Octo-mom story, the Dugger family and others are being used as Hegelian pawns. They are the crisis and the reaction from the public or public perceptio is that people are sick of what these mega families represent and are stating that something needs to be done because these people put a strain on the system. The underlying agenda is that while using these examples, people can easily see a need for population controls in order to guarantee global sustainability.
We had proposed that Global Sustainability is the root agenda that exists in “The Green” movement. It is also interesting to note that at the Rio+20 summit on sustainability the United nations in its quest for selling its “green philosophies” stooped to using ecclesiastical symbolism by putting Christian symbols like the fish and cross out of discarded plastic bottles on display and lighting the famous “Christos” statue a bright green.
The Health care plan is part of the plan of global sustainability and each one is using religious mingling to get the average person to pay attention. It is there to sell the average person on the cult of sustainability and the threat of world end because of over population.
An Oregon State University study suggested that having multiple children may be the most environmentally damaging of all human activities. It was reported by CNN ‘s Lou Dobbs that by simply having one less child, the study concludes, the same American would save more than 9,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide, almost 20 times the reduction of living greener.
The report featured an interview with professor Paul Murtaugh who went out of his way to state that the study does not advocate particular policies of restrictions on reproductive freedom but most certainly indicates that more people on the planet constitutes more strain on the ecology. Hidden in the report was the idea that we need to have fewer children. This would mean less people using resources in order to save the planet.
I believe that it is necessary to bring up in the argument over Obama’s new health care something that does not create the political creep but opens the mind to the real agenda. The Global planners hooked the majority with “climate change” and the socially engineered "saving the planet from the environmental cataclysmic model” fears requiring a substantial reduction in the population and a weeding out of certain people. In order to do this we need a well monitored health or medical surveillance state that requires health insurance. This is a way to make money, monitor health, and create a shared data base that can be used against you in many respects.
This now opens an argument for an urgency to justify laws requiring euthanasia, eugenic infanticide, futile care provisions, and weeding out those with undesirable genetic propensities through the mapping of an infant’s genome literally marking them genetically for a “predisposed” outcome.
In the past there was a proposed left wing conspiracy to create “death panels.” This was a very controversial thought first proposed by Sarah Palin.
We don’t need Death Panels to create a model for global sustainability. We won’t have to send Grandma away when she is sick, no need to send retarded babies to the abortion pile.
This would be obviously barbaric and no one would stand for it. There are pundits like Howard Dean that will tell you that that the government does not encourage euthanasia or infanticide, however it must be stated that the government does provide enough opportunities for Americans to choose this method of population control. However the culling plan has always been found in the reality of Iatrogenic artifact, and accidental death through the overmedicating of the populace. The culling agenda will not be overt but hidden in the way it is written. The fine print shows that it has been used many times before.
It has already been used in the form of selective treatment, genetics directives and in family planning. The future is going to be riddled with a series of biological attacks, plagues, and unknown diseases that are difficult to control.
It has been established in the Rio+20 summit that provisions for “sustainable development” can include controlled wars, plagues, and famines. The world has to prepare for what Hitler called “the sifting of human material.”
It has been proposed and it will be carried out. Forget about the proposed fines and penalties for not having healthcare insurance. When people around you are dying you will have no choice but to get into an affordable health care plan.
Jane Burgermeister who has written for the British medical Journal, Nature, The Scientist, Reuters Health, and The Guardian among other publications is now blowing the whistle on a plan being devised by the elite to sicken the population at the end of 2012. She has declared that the Globalists have been strengthening their mass pandemic vaccination machinery under the control of WHO. All that
is required is a new “trigger“, a new wave of “bird flu“ virus hype, and we could again be facing the same threat of mass vaccination from toxic jabs as in 2009 and also by force.
The American people who all of a sudden have felt the urge to jump up and down and scream fascism when they see their health care model changing are doing too little too late. Many are protesting the health care plan on a misinformed political bias. The debate should be about the rise of medical surveillance and that we are now all in the crosshairs for death. We have Pharmaceutical companies that overcharge for drugs. There are already doctors who refuse treatment because of lack of insurance. While doctors are doing their jobs, many find themselves in a situation where they are unable to do their jobs properly. The elite have already proposed that scores of people need to die in order to maintain global sustainability.
This is not entirely a product t of Barack Obama, it is a product of Hegelian rat catching that existed before him.
And we are the rats.