REVERSE ENGINEERED HOMICIDE
For several years we have watched the skies and even the ground because of reports stating that we are on a collision course with what is up above us. The military-industrial complex has beefed up its methods of trying to combat space threats. We hear rumors that the military is engaging in secret battles with unknown objects. One of the biggest secrets being kept by the intelligence groups is that there are areas above the United States known as “unknown flight corridors” where UAV’s and UFO’s are always seen, and that military engagement of these unknowns is common.
These areas are known for testing drones, as well as fighter planes that have been clocked in excess of 5 miles a second. This is remarkable especially when we wonder about the possibility of reverse engineered aircraft that may be from another superpower or even from a crashed extra-terrestrial vehicle. This creates an unsettling advantage in the war theater. This is where we have to ask ourselves: if those we kill in war do not have the same advantages as we do, is it war?
Wars are usually fought with mutual risk involved between the fighting parties.
Essentially the moral license for wars and the bloodletting is that both sides take the same risks and both sides make a bargain that both sides are willing to accept a certain amount of casualties. It is a case of each side willing to die in that war. This is where the warrior has courage, because he takes a risk and lays his life on the line for his country, or whomever he is willing to die for.
Where we see technological terror being created, whether it be back-engineered alien craft or human-invented unmanned drones, the morality of the bargain begins to slip away. We see that there is no contest between the killers and the killed.
Armed drones sneak in under radar and make the kill with no physical risk from the operator. Now we have to ask ourselves the obvious question: “Are attack drones moral?” The drone operator lines up his target and makes his kill without experiencing any risk to himself. The controller does not have to experience what warriors on the ground have to go through. There is no courage and apparently no real morality from the operator.
The kill is clean and the one who is killed or targeted has no way of fighting back in a mutual battle.
The controller is invisible and the hunted has no way of facing his hunter. This is where we begin to see a group with far more superior technology invade and bring to its knees a group that does not possess the same technology.
It is similar to a hostile alien invasion scenario.
In the remake of War of the Worlds, the alien process of invading the world first started with the power grid being taken down by electronic pulse detonations. A weather front was used at first to generate dangerous lightning strikes that darkened the planet. These electronic pulses can be recreated without the use of any advanced alien technology with the use of the HAARP array. Many people are still unaware of what HARRP is or does, and there are countless theories, some crazy and others not so crazy, about the potential of this array for war. HAARP stands for High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program. It has the potential if not the secret capability of ionospheric heating, EMP and HEMP detonation, weather control and mental disabling.
These feats, for some, may be indistinguishable from magic much like alien weapons. The HAARP array even has the alleged ability to create an earthquake. So here we have an advanced technical advantage that once again makes us wonder if it is a moral and weapon and do the people that it is being used on know that they are being targeted?
Furthermore, in The War of the Worlds film, we see advanced tripod weapons rising out of the ground. While these tripod weapons are cumbersome machines, they still produce a death ray. The death ray is fired by remote control and can pulverize buildings and humans on a cellular level. Everything is reduced to dust by remote control. The aliens are not at all in the position to do hand to hand combat; they are content to be in an armored tripod blasting everything in their way. This is calculated murder by the alien invaders. They know that the humans are incapable of fighting back and they are more than happy to destroy them in a push button war.
We see the hate and fear from the human being hunted by the alien hunter. In other science fiction movies we see space stations the size of small moons capable of having an entire planet scream out in terror and then suddenly silenced as it is obliterated by a large energy bolt.
It was the Death Star in the movie Star Wars that kept all planets from rebelling against an ever-an encroaching empire. What was once a fantasy tale of and empire run amok is now a reality as technology that is unmanned and powerful is being used against an undefined enemy and in some cases against the American people.
I also wonder about the idea of restraint. If there is no real risk involved with killing humans by remote control, where does it end? In video games the first person shooter will shoot without thinking. There is no need to because there is no moment to see the eyes of the enemy or hear their screams for help. A machine with a remote device for shooting has no moral compass. It moves in and coldly, with brute force, kills whatever is in its way including innocent women and children. They become collateral damage in the war between the superior and the inferior. It is war between the aliens with advanced tech and the puny insignificant other without any way to defend itself.
There is also the issue of this entire advanced tech being illegal. The U.N. Charter provides rules provided that make rules about how wars are declared and carried out.
Article 2 of the U.N. Charter states that the use of drones and other advanced technologies as force should only be done so to defend the United States from an armed aggression against its borders or sovereignty:
“All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.”
Furthermore, there are only two circumstances under which the use of force is legitimate or legal: one, when the use of force is in self-defense against armed aggression, and, two, when the U.N. Security Council has authorized it. These drone strikes are not actions that defend the United States from armed aggression against its borders or sovereignty, and they have not been authorized by the Security Council.
So the legality of using this highly advanced weaponry against an enemy that does not have a sufficient amount of ordinance to defend itself and is not an immediate threat to the borders of the United States is in dispute. However, there does not seem to be any effort to stop the use of highly advanced weapons against primitive nations.
Drones are a threat to dignity. They brings the warzone front and center in a matter of seconds. Right now I can see how advanced technology against an enemy is something we all can agree will ensure safety.
However, this advanced technology is not just going to be saved for some farmer with an RPG in Afghanistan.
The machines will be above us in the United States soon and then we will also experience how these machines of war can divide communities and generate a sense of fear. Meanwhile, many UFO sightings are being reported in 2012, and while it is easy for armchair analysts to cry “fake” when these UFO’s show up on YouTube, it may be more to our advantage to look into these UFO’s as possible test platforms for experimental aircraft and drones that may pose a future threat to your security.
In February of 2012, Barack Obama signed a sweeping aviation bill that, among other things, will open the skies to “unmanned aircraft systems,” more commonly known as drones. We will now see 30,000 armed, unmanned drones patrolling the skies above us.
They will record the route and speed of every vehicle on the streets. They will observe the movements of individual pedestrians. At night, they will capture the precise moments when the lights in living rooms and bedrooms are turned on and off. The data they acquire, which can be correlated with information from mobile devices and smart meters, will become an important component of the growing digital record of nearly everything we do. The idea that the drones are armed is not comforting. Living under the gun, especially under the observation of a robot, is like something out of the Terminator films.
In the first Terminator film, Skynet is described as being a revolutionary artificial intelligence system built by Cyberdyne Systems for SAC-NORAD. According to Kyle Reese, Skynet “saw all humans as a threat; not just the ones on the other side,” and “decided our fate in a microsecond: extermination.” Skynet began a nuclear war which destroyed most of the human population, and initiated a program of genocide against the survivors.
The Pentagon is now increasing their surprise military drills around the country, alarming citizens and acclimating them to the presence of obtrusive combat technology and simulated warfare.
There have also been unconfirmed reports that buses have been seen on major highways that have blackened-out windows and are allegedly used for the mass transport of detainees, or as refrigerated mobile morgues moving through Los Angeles.
There are also a number of declassified documents and even a House bill being proposed where the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Department of Homeland Security are planning for or are addressing the need for Mortician teams to prepare for Mass casualties in the United states. A new bill HR 6566 was introduced on the floor of the US House of Representatives. The bill is entitled the “Mass Fatality Planning and Religious Considerations Act,” (PDF) and its stated purpose is “to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to provide guidance and coordination for mass fatality planning.”
Not long ago Ground Zero reported that CIA General Counsel Stephen Preston went on the record as saying that “American citizens are not immune from being treated like an enemy if they take up arms against the United States.” Furthermore, they are not immune from being treated like a potential enemy if they protest, assemble with groups or even have the slightest connection to a well-known terrorist organization. You don’t have to assemble bombs, threaten schoolchildren, or burn a flag to be under suspicion. They don’t even need probable cause. If they think that you are a threat or if they profile you as a terror mastermind, you may not see the light of day.
There are many people who will take the government’s word that the new laws and the civil rights violation only apply to terrorists, however that is naïve and there are a lot of people who have been under the gun and harassed by alphabet agencies and government paid security just because they fit a certain profile that has nothing to do with guilt or any other associations with so called terrorists. America is literally under the gun. People who have never experienced government harassment are so sure of themselves in the knowledge that it doesn’t happen here, that there are no American targets. It is already assumed that if you are a target you most definitely have some sort of guilt.
This is wrong. But this attitude is normal for those who have been traumatized into accepting, without question or rebellion, a police state.
There is no longer an American loyalty when hierarchy is in charge; there is now a world concern and a world campaign, forged by American policy makers, which is now beginning to trouble those who have been the star players in the patriot games. The rules have changed and the game theory no longer favors the residents of the homeland. The list of enemies is now a “kill” or “hit” list on which American citizens are in the crosshairs.
In the past year it has been obvious that America has been designated a human hunting ground, as gunmen who have military grade ordnance have been shooting up shopping malls, movie theaters, and now religious complexes. The terrorism that is experienced in other countries is now becoming a common occurrence in the United States. It is also appearing to be carried out against foreigners, Muslims and Jews.
These tactics have a pattern. From movie theaters to religious centers, we see the beginning of an organized plan to have terrorist activity to appear to be carried out by domestic extremists. The question now is whether or not this is an organized effort to create a “panic” policy in the United States so that the country will beg for drone surveillance and a militarized police presence.
There is also a report in which a US Army Military Police training manual for “Civil Disturbance Operations” outlined fully how the military can be brought in to domestically to quell riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.
The rules of engagement during these so-called civil revolts have changed dramatically. Now the rules regarding the use of “deadly force” in confronting “dissidents” have been made disturbingly clear. The new directive is that “Warning shots will not be fired.”
It has also been pointed out that in these confrontations drones may be used to not only observe but in some cases shoot a target.
While UFO’s are being seen all over the country, we may want to stop for a moment and think that the UFO we see may just be an unmanned drone, or some exotic war plane being tested out of Area 51, or Plant 42.
The Government has clearly stated that there is a race for a full spectrum of control from the sky. In some ways it would be comforting to think that aliens are up there flying around. The alternative makes it quite clear that we are now the targets of our government. It would be convenient to blame everything on the aliens, because an alien has never stood trial for crimes against humanity.