PAYING FOR THE SECOND DEADLY SIN
In May of 2012, long before I had the privilege of being on a fine national network like Premiere Networks, I presented a topic that many of my listeners thought was irrelevant and some were thinking that I was being ultra cruel towards the obese. I assured them that a man who admits to be at least 80 pounds overweight had no bones to pick with those who are fat. In fact, in the face of opposition I had clearly joked that it was time for me to diet because if I didn’t I knew the aliens would land and would want to chomp on my fatty body.
I had theorized that the obese were going to be targets in the medical surveillance state which left a lot of people uncomfortable. I was uncomfortable too, only because I knew that I would also have to realize that I would be a target if I did not consider a better diet.
I called the program “Body Count” and how it was beginning to look as if there would be a few changes in the way we see the obese in this country and that eventually the attitude about them would be to just let them die. The reason I thought this was because of the fact that the elite always seem to have plans for those that they think are consuming vital resources on the planet and well the obese have always been an easy scapegoat that can be ridiculed and eventually the sacrificial lamb for the benefit of preserving limited resources on the planet.
The obese consume more than the average human on earth, they have more health risks and they are considered a burden on the idea of global sustainability.
There is, in essence, a global conspiracy against the obese. It is once again a crisis that has been created by the planners of the global agenda. It goes against their plan to keep the world order on the brink of starvation. The agenda of the globalists is to tighten the belt on resources and those who consume the most resources will be the first to be considered for the culling.
Many Americans are depressed and in a state of post-traumatic ennui which contributes to a sedentary lifestyle. They are fed the wrong information about nutrition and diet. They are coerced in eating foods that are being called healthy because of vast amounts of lobbying in Washington and the lies that are advertised are immediately believed without discernment.
In the meantime, they are part of a nutritional iatrogenic plot to create the body count and cull the populace gradually.
The New York Times allegedly spoke on behalf of many people who believe that both the obese and smokers are a burden on the system and that perhaps it is best to let them die, rather than to waste time treating the diseases that they contract from being in their condition.
According to a recent article posted in the medical section, "annual health care costs are roughly $96 billion for smokers and $147 billion for the obese, the government says. These costs accompany sometimes heroic attempts to prolong lives, including surgery, chemotherapy and other measures."
But despite these rescue attempts, smokers tend to die 10 years earlier on average, and the obese die five to 12 years prematurely, according to various researchers' estimates.
And attempts to curb smoking and unhealthy eating frequently lead to backlash: Witness the current legal tussle over New York City's first-of-its-kind limits on the size of sugary beverages and the vicious fight last year in California over a ballot proposal to add a $1-per-pack cigarette tax, which was ultimately defeated.
We are being told that no matter our body condition, there is a pill to lower cholesterol, there is a remedy for high blood pressure, and a motorized scooter that can be used when your ability to walk ends because your fat and weak body remains alive because of pharmaceutical companies willing and able to pump you full of drugs rather than encourage healthy eating and movement.
Americans never stop and wonder why there are things like acid reflux or fibromyalgia and childhood obesity that are chronic and making people sick. Let alone why cancer is no longer something we escape but have to eventually endure because we simply rationalize that we are living longer.
Now it seems that there is a group of the elite that wish to evaluate under the new medical surveillance plan whether or not the obese are worth the effort to save, and whether or not smokers should be left to die if they continue to damage themselves.
One in five U.S. adults smoke and one in three are obese and lawmakers are frustrated that if they cannot legislate away their choices to smoke or over eat, then perhaps they should all die and get it over with.
Smokers will get it the worst. The New “Affordable Health Care Act” or Obama care will penalize smokers with financial penalties and the older you are the higher you penalty will be.
Tobacco penalties under President Obama’s Affordable Care Act could subject millions of smokers to fees costing thousands of dollars, making healthcare more expensive for them than Americans with other unhealthy habits.
Obamacare could subject smokers to premiums that are 50 percent higher than usual, starting in 2014. Health insurers will be allowed to charge smokers penalties that overweight Americans or those with other health conditions would not be subjected to.
A 60-year-old smoker could pay penalties as high as $5,100, in addition to the premiums, the Associated Press reports. A 55-year-old smoker’s penalty could reach $4,250.
We can all say that smoking is a bad habit, and the decision to smoke is a bad health decision but for those who are already hooked we are beginning to see how the burdens on society are being named and that they are being singled out as abusers of the global resources.
We all know that quitting smoking is not an easy task and charging older smokers up to three times as much as younger ones could make it difficult for them to seek care in the first place. which provides plausible deniability for an intentional culling of the populace. Think about it: a 60-year-old smoker charged with the penalty could be paying about $8,411 per year for health insurance, which is about 24 percent of a $35,000 income and is considered “unaffordable” under federal law.
Many of the older smokers probably would avoid seeking medical care for cancer or breathing problems if this were the case and would eventually die.
Now it would be the American thought that people should have freedom of choice in this matter; however, advocates of the slow death of those who smoke and overeat say that the “harm principle” should be invoked in this case, meaning that what the overweight and the smokers do is harm other people with their abuses to themselves.
According to the think tank known as the Hastings Center, “Smoking has the most obvious impact. Studies have increasingly shown harm to nonsmokers who are unlucky enough to work or live around heavy smokers. And several studies have shown heart attacks and asthma attack rates fell in counties or cities that adopted big smoking bans.”
It is however much harder to make the argument that fat people harm others. However, the burden on the healthcare system is what the elite are worried about. They will use it as a cudgel to create a class of people that you can hate because of how they allegedly expect everyone else to pay into the healthcare system for their diabetes care, heart surgeries and other medical expenses that are incurred by the obese.
While obesity is clearly linked with serious health problems and early death, the evidence is not as clear about people why Americans are becoming more and more overweight.
The obesity crisis is a result of trauma. It is the result of cutting corners to feed a population that will be considered a threat to global sustainability.
I contend that the body count and the increase of obese Americans has to point to additives and toxins that we should have never introduced into the food supply.
The best “homeland defense” is to be aware and fund protection of human and agricultural health systems that can detect and deal with whatever comes in. We should take a look at how Europe is banning foods that are GMO’s and are not using additives that are known to create chemical and biological reactions in the human body.
What if substances that are foreign to the body are given the go ahead for use and the public would be unaware of their toxicity. We have been hearing of the warnings with regard to additives like Aspartame and Senomyx which is cultured in human fetal kidney cells.
We also know that genetically modified food stuffs are now being used for breakfast cereals and they are being introduced into the food supply. Is it any wonder that our bodies may respond negatively to the toxicity, bloating, reflux, cancers they are all in the picture now and there is no explanation only that humans are not supposed to live as long as they do. The quality of life the foods we consume are beginning to diminish. Many times now we have heard of people dying in their mid 40’s, or children who have juvenile diabetes, or develop pertussis, or autism or worse.
It is the food we eat and the drugs we consume to give us an excuse to become fatter, sexually inert and unhealthy.
And while researchers do not yet understand the exact risks from decades of persistent exposure to random combinations of low levels of pharmaceuticals, recent studies which have gone virtually unnoticed by the general public have found alarming effects on human cells and wildlife. Our existence is fragile and we are chasing after the wrong things and fighting stupid wars.
The scapegoating of the obese and those who smoke is very much a dry run for something that will be far more reaching.
I know that I may sound crazy for continually saying that these proposals are all part of hidden eugenics directives for the culling of the populace and earlier I have mentioned the plans that have been put in writing with Agenda 21 and other proposals including the affordable healthcare surveillance state.
Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations system, governments and major groups in every area in which humans impact the environment. The purpose of this agenda is to review ways the world can be a better place for sustainable development. According to the report, Habitat II within the agenda– sustainable development consists of a number of suggestions to improve environment. First in the agenda is to establish a group consensus of crises and solutions that include separating the people and eventually culling them.
This style of commentary was realized in Mein Kampf where Hitler stated that it is important to “sift the human material” for those who support decisions of the leaders and those who do not support these decisions.
One of fundamental ways to do this is to withhold food, or sustenance. It is also becoming apparent that health care is also a way to control the way the populace lives.
We know that food and tobacco are not the same, but as you can see the consumption of food and tobacco is now being labeled as a threat to global sustainability.
Health issues that are plaguing our country are far more complicated than pointing fingers at who’s going to pay for them – and require complex, compassionate and long-term strategies.
However, it seems that America not only is a land of heavy using of resources it is also a land of pointing fingers, creating scapegoats and condemning an “other” that is created when a campaign or an agenda needs to be pushed by the elite in order to bring about changed that make them comfortable. We are now in the midst of national shame, and blame and dialogues that are skewed and are full of ridicule.
The dialogue that will eventually evolve from the tobacco and obesity debate is whether or not the poor deserve to live. That is what this is all going to evolve into. Keep in mind that smoking and obesity, disproportionately affects lower-income Americans.
Can we safely just get to the point and realize that the elite would love to see the poor die as quickly as possible?
I mean aren’t we talking about human beings here?
I wonder if we are forgetting this.
It is once again a crisis that has been created by the planners of the global agenda. It goes against their plan to keep the world order on the brink of starvation. The agenda of the globalists is to tighten the belt on resources and those who consume the most resources will be the first to be considered for the culling.
So for now "smoke ‘em if ya got ‘em" and "eat drink and be merry" for tomorrow we either die or diet.