MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
We study history in order to understand how humans have responded in the past to similar events and situations. As a society, we should have a compelling interest in making sure that people understand how government functions, within the context of our history.
But, at the same time, there are powerful commercial interests that see an informed citizenry as a direct threat to corporate power. These corporations would rather have a citizenry that is easily influenced to accept whatever message is given to them by the corporate-controlled media. For this reason, they find the topics of the American Revolution and the Civil War to be particularly dangerous. The possibility that people might view the government as an instrument of the public will much less take up arms to oppose entrenched power, which is a dangerous idea that must be squelched on all levels.
That is why people who understand history can cut beyond partisan dogma and controlled propaganda in order to see the ulterior purposes behind those who represent our government and their nefarious actions. Part of the dilemma for anyone who truly wants to understand these actions and re-actions is that ‘nothing they do’ within the circles of power and greed seems to make any logical sense. Thanks to highly controlled information many Americans are unaware of the criminal activity that is going on behind the scenes. Many who are aware are helpless to do anything about it.
There have been many times that I have secretly told friends and acquaintances that the paranormal work I do is intriguing and fun. It is always mesmerizing and it gives me the same feeling as I get when watching a magician fool me with sleight of hand or some other illusion. However, the conspiracy theorist in me is the practical side of the illusion and sometimes when you come upon something that just doesn’t sit well and then you report it, what happens next is thankless.
The truth has always been elusive for some, and with others, they always seem to tell people that it is the panacea that makes you free. However, truth and freedom are in some cases states of mind and many people believe the truth is comfortable and is warm and inviting.
The truth really isn’t the truth anymore. It is just words in an echo chamber the gives a stroke to your cognitive bias.
The truth is uncomfortable that is why so many people choose to believe the lie. That is why we are now officially drowning in a sea of illusion in the United States and the distractions are being forced upon us to not look at the truth and while we are thinking that all things are under control, the underlying truth is yes they are truly under control but in a way that is not suitable for a republic or a democracy.
As a result of the well-documented confirmation bias, we tend to undervalue evidence that contradicts our beliefs and overvalue evidence that confirms them. We filter out inconvenient truths and arguments on the opposing side. As a result, our opinions solidify, and it becomes increasingly harder to disrupt established patterns of thinking.
We believe in alternative facts if they support our pre-existing beliefs.
Now, we are witnessing the age where beliefs are now being intertwined with your identity no matter if they are completely unaware of facts.
People are worried that if they have their minds changed they are going to lose a vital part of their identity.
Partisan political division and the resulting incivility has reached a low in America, with 67% believing that the nation is nearing civil war, according to a new national battleground survey. The poll was taken by Georgetown University’s Institute of Politics and Public Service. The institute is now warning America that the political division is likely to make the upcoming 2020 presidential race the nastiest in modern history.
The poll also found that 87% are frustrated with the rudeness in politics today; it also revealed that the public really isn’t interested in traditional compromise. For example, a nearly equal 84% said that they are “tired of leaders compromising their values and ideals.
While Democrats are saying from the debates that the 2020 election will be the most vital in our nation’s history, the truth is a lot more inconvenient.
Let no one fool you – this election is going to be the election where there will be a race between candidates that less than half the country likes.
The truth is people are waking up and seeing the political circus for what it is with clowns on both sides of the political spectrum treating or elections like a clown car.
Everyone runs for president. Nobody cares – everyone has an agenda and not one group is favored which breeds anger and soon the fragmentation of the parties will result in collapse.
This means that as much as the media wants to parade around left-wing contenders – many of them are not electable and in reality, most people feel embarrassed to even be affiliated with any of them. The satirists and the late-night talk and variety shows often show their seething hate against Trump in their sketches and monologues but if you watch carefully they are also mocking the democratic candidates as well.
People can pretend they are happy with their party’s delegates and act as though they are politically interested but the fact is they are bored, embarrassed, and fickle.
Each extremist pity party wants to be heard and when they aren’t they will rise up violently against a system they feel have betrayed them.
There is a relative consensus that divisions in this country are getting worse, and as I predicted there are even divisive attitudes within the parties. This also adds to the possibility of civil war.
Traditional democracy is gone and our foreign counterparts are now noticing. Our form of government now has demonstrated weakness and it is becoming apparent that our foreign counterparts are looking for a weakness to exploit, something that they can use to finally show us that we are no better than anyone else on the planet.
The outsiders looking in can now ascertain that we have no free media. We live in an illusion that it is free; however, now they are citing that Google and Facebook are platforms that are being used to monitor dissent and a tool to crush or otherwise penalize anyone who speaks out against this type of oppression.
The left is now saying the Facebook wantonly allows lies to be printed about the candidates or should it be said that people have posted memes and uncomfortable things linking people like Hillary Clinton to the death Jeffery Epstein.
The outsiders meaning critics in our allied countries are also seeing that we are having questionable elections, we have questionable leadership and many are now saying that much of what we are seeing happening in America is no different than what was done in Soviet Russia during the communist occupation.
All you have to do is vocalize your disgust for the truth and learn the lesson, most American are disgusted with the courts, many want to see the elimination of due process and favor the police state and federal control when they are really pushed.
The media as the voice of the government maintains that national dialogue of crushing any subversive or otherwise rebellious prose against the government and the people are more than willing to support the dialogue by offering up their support in opinion polls and by continuing to support political parties that enable this unhealthy attitude.
Anyone in the media that wishes to break away from the Orwellian newspeak is now met with all kinds of harsh treatment many even die while in the midst of reporting the truth. I think that those who are honest with themselves know how this is going to end and that sad part is it appears that it will be a self-fulfilling prophecy of some bold country or even organization finding its way over our borders setting up camp and blending in.
Upon orders from some unknown command, they will move from city to city doing for us what we believe we are doing for some country like Afghanistan or Iraq.
There has always been this fear that one day the United States government would fall to some sort of coup or that there would be a political wrecking ball operation that would render the government useless and with an emergency vote or referendum the people would be forced into choosing some form of emergency government that would make all sorts of promises and utilize a global charter to enforce some form of Marxism.
If we do have a civil war, you may want to consider that when other countries fall into civil war and have questionable elections — there is always the possibility that some country or even the United Nations would be called in to bring order to the situation.
When the 2030 agenda was first being proposed in 2015, there was a definite focus on sustainability and how new laws that uphold global sustainability would be enforced. They knew that the proposals that they wanted to enforce would enrage a lot of people –and so it was proposed that if need be blue-helmeted United Nations personnel could be replacing municipal police forces whose ranks have been harassed and hollowed out because of civil unrest and violent activism that critics say will increase because of proposals that will limit personal freedoms in the United States. There have now been several reports about a secret meeting that took place during the U.N. Summit that proposed the idea of something called the Strong Cities Network.
The Strong Cities Network is being launched at a time when citizens who dare to stand up for individual rights are automatically branded as dissenters who must be cowed into silence. The project came from out of nowhere and was introduced at United Nations headquarters on September 30th, 2015 by Attorney General, Loretta Lynch.
It has been stated that The Strong Cities Network will be implemented “to strengthen community resilience against violent extremism” With no public input, no Congress debate or vote, it will be blue helmets and not local cops who will be policing the streets of America.
This amounts to nothing less than the overriding of American laws, up to and including the United States Constitution, in favor of United Nations laws that would henceforth be implemented in the United States itself.
The Department of Justice issued a press release that stated:
“Cities are vital partners in international efforts to build social cohesion and resilience to violent extremism. Local communities and authorities are the most credible and persuasive voices to challenge violent extremism in all of its forms and manifestations in their local contexts. While many cities and local authorities are developing innovative responses to address this challenge, no systematic efforts are in place to share experiences, pool resources and build a community of cities to inspire local action on a global scale.
The Strong Cities Network will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration,” said Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch. “As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world.”
Hubs that are set up to review the Strong City proposals have been set up in cities all across the country. Many Strong City consultants have briefed law enforcement and even the clergy about what they plan to do in case things get out of hand.
The Strong Cities Network will empower municipal bodies to fill this gap while working with civil society and safeguarding the rights of local citizens and communities. The SCN will strengthen strategic planning and practices to address violent extremism in all its forms by fostering collaboration among cities, municipalities and other sub-national authorities.
Nowhere does the 2030 agenda and the Strong Cities Network enforcement indicate that “achieving human freedom” is one of its goals. This is a nightmare that has been spoken of by conspiracy theorists for decades and now by some stroke of irony, the notion becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Mostly all talk and no action, the U.N. has never in its entire history strengthened community resilience against violent extremism, no matter how compelling the need and is, in fact, on the public record for standing down in many instances.
So the question is why now, and why the United States and do we have any proof that they are preparing to help or “take over” our government in case there is an uprising?
Well, at the end of October there was a viral video that was being viewed on the internet about how the United Nations had taken over a civic center in Salt Lake City. While people are asking “Why has the United Nations taken over an American City,” the truth is that while the United Nations did take over the Salt Palace conventions center last August – the video showing how they handled journalists is just making the rounds.
While the focus of internet conspiracy theorists is that some Unite Nations officers declared the center a sovereign state for the time they were there – they should be focusing on how the meeting was all about what they called “The Civil Society Conference.”
The theme of this year’s conference was “building inclusive and sustainable cities and communities.”
Basically the meeting dealt with how the United Nations will enforce their “sustainability goals” in major cities across the United States.
They claimed in a statement that their goal is to make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable by 2030.
Furthermore reading further in their mission statement we find that they wish to enforce a form of global socialism by 2030 –with the ultimate goal of fully sustainable and socialist programs worldwide by 2051.
According to their statement:
Today 55% of the world’s population lives in urban areas and that figure is expected to reach 68% by 2051. As the complexities of urban life grow, communities and local leaders are at the forefront of finding sustainable solutions to poverty and inadequate housing, hunger and health, clean water, energy, environmental degradation and climate change, infrastructure, transport, education, migration, violence and gender equality. These and other challenges are interconnected with similar issues in rural areas and municipalities of all sizes, where activists and civil society organizations partner with governments and the private sector to ensure that communities are inclusive, equitable and sustainable.
As an international body ever-expanding its power base, and ever failing at the international level, the U.N. has been active at the municipal level of government where it first advanced its intrusive Agenda 21, now Agenda 2030.
Anyone who questions these moves will be painted with the conspiracy theorist brush.
However, the conspiracy is obvious and it is quite interesting how the United Nations was able to infiltrate a city’s civic center and declare it sovereign as they plot to undermine our constitutional republic in the process.
Now think for a moment what the United Nations’ did last August.
They set up what they called a “compound” in the middle of Salt Lake City
• The UN says they “took over” the building
• The UN stated that the taxpayer-funded Salt Palace was now “International Territory” where US rights don’t apply
• The UN stated that the United States was outside the doors of the Salt Palace
• The UN, who at best should have been a guest of Salt Lake, instead acted like an invader and denied the press an opportunity to cover the meeting.
• Clearly the United Nations should not be allowed to simply claim territory in the middle of the United States and deny any US citizen any of their inalienable rights.
The act of U.N. Strong City “enforcement” seems to now be the clandestine military police unit for the entire planet. The prophetic words of Henry Kissinger, which can be found in a quote taken from a Bilderberg meeting, shows the passivity of American citizens towards the ever-encroaching U.N. jackboot of the new world.
At the 1991 Bilderberg Conference at Evian, France, Kissinger allegedly remarked that:
“Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there was an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all people of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the world government.”
It seems a bit too late to revive the Constitution and Americans are too stunned to move out of the way of the steam roller called tyranny that will flatten any and all that defy. The implications of many Americans from the lowly to the high and mighty in crimes against the state will become the norm if we continue on the direction we are going.
I am sure we cannot fathom the idea of the United Nations calling upon another country’s military to come in and clean up the mess we are in right now but we have done it to other countries and I am sure that this wrecking ball operation is meant to weaken our government and create civil upheaval that will result in a globalist enforcement of state socialist procedures.
In 2004, Rolling Stone magazine voted John Lennon’s song, “Imagine,” the third greatest song of all time. Former president Jimmy Carter observed that “in many countries around the world… you hear John Lennon’s song, ‘Imagine,’ used almost equally with national anthems.” The song is indeed beautiful. However, Lennon was quoted in the book Lennon in America, by Geoffrey Giuliano as saying that the song is “an anti-religious, anti-nationalist, anti-conventional, anti-capitalist song, but because it’s sugar-coated, it’s accepted.” Lennon also described the song as “virtually the Communist Manifesto.”
Songs like “Imagine” were believed to be a product of the age-old philosophy of “collectivism,” philosophies emphasizing the collective over the individual fighting for a common cause or threat. Marxism, more than any other philosophy, has influenced modern collectivist thinking by adding equality and fraternity to the traditional collectivist values.
However, there is a line in that famous song that says “Imagine all the people living lives in peace” and where this verse ends it continues with the idea being a dream and that only dreamers think of world peace. It is most certainly an understatement because while some people believe that this 2030 agenda will bring world peace, the U.N. is demonstrating that they are uninvolved in peacekeeping efforts with regards to the enforcement of such an agenda. Marxism always moves in to fill the vacuum left behind by anarchy.
That is why the U.N. has seen fit to flex its muscles in the United States to try and bring order.
And it appears that they can have America for a song.
The conundrum is whether or not we should allow for the inevitable or fight to keep the republic from disintegrating into a New Order that supports the global plantation.