Podcast Logo


Posted on March 16th, 2021 by Clyde Lewis


There are dozens of articles all over the mainstream reassuring us that the Sars-Cov-2 vaccine is safe. Many of them are repetitive articles that seem to be churned out by some news writing services where journalists are being paid to fill in the blanks with undefinedinsert state hereundefined and put undefinedgovernor’s commentsundefined there.

They must also include praise for President Biden in this section and deride those who question the efficacy and safety of the vaccine.

I am sure there are also recommended words they are told they can use to describe those who question the efficacy and risk of the vaccine. Words like undefinedconspiracy theoristundefined or undefinedanti science.undefined Perhaps something more general like undefinedanti-vaxxerundefined or undefinedQAnon extremist.undefined

On the other side of that coin, many experts in the field have vociferously called for all vaccine trials to be put on halt, some medical researchers are questioning the data and others counsel people to refuse the vaccine under any and all circumstances.

So – is the vaccine safe? The only rational answer is “we don’t know”.

It’s certainly true some people who have received it have experienced unexpected side effects.

People ask me if I am going to get vaccinated and I tell them honestly that I do not know. I am deeply concerned about how the Pfizer booster shot has made people very ill . Most of them have had to take 3 days off of work to recover.

My wife had that experience and she also developed a rash after getting it.

I canundefinedt afford to just take off work like that and so I am resolving that I may just get the Johnson and Johnson shot . I hear that it is not an mRNA vaccine but a regular Adenovirus vaccine.

Johnson & Johnson Covid vaccine: Analysts are cautiously optimistic

Much like a flu shot which I have never received.

There are also those stories that we may have forgotten about the initial responses to the vaccine that donundefinedt sound fun.

If you remember 4 people involved in the US-based trial suffered partial facial paralysis.

Others that received the vaccine suffered allergic anaphylactic reactions.

They don’t know what caused the reaction, and as far as we know so far, the people involved were not allergic to anything in the vaccine. It seems it’s not about being allergic to the vaccine, so much as the vaccine potentially causing problems for anyone with a sensitive or dysfunctional immune system.

It’s essentially recommended that no one who is allergic to anything, ie. other food or medication, should have the jab.

We’ve already had “explainers” appearing the media, saying vaccine allergic reactions are “rare and short-lived”.

We also are told not to be discouraged and that we should trust the science.

But the Science is not being at all congruent with their explanations as to why they are using a double standard with regard to Covid recovery, COVID mortality and vaccine related side effects and death tolls.

There are many people who have noticed that there is one topic that you should never talk about on Facebook. The topic that is taboo is anything and everything that is connected to COVID-19 or vaccines.

Is Facebook's ban of Far-Right extremists and Google's new Youtube policy different from state-led censorship such as in China? | by Raphael Tsavkko Garcia | Medium

Facebook figures that any information about COVID-19 needs to be analyzed by their all-knowing bots and unless it is approved by any number of experts like Dr. Fauci or Bill Gates you get a notice saying that you have committed a thought crime.

You are assumed to be a person who has deliberately posted something that may bring harm to someone.

This is a grave offense which puts you in Facebook jail.

I was not allowed to comment for 24 hours because of a report I filed from the World Economic Forum about an ultra violet light invention that was said to help in the fight against COVID-19.

The other day I posted a news story about Marvelous Marvin Hagler, a boxer who suddenly died at the age of 66. The story reported that Hagler died after he received a COVID-19 Vaccine.

Today I removed the story form Facebook because there was a report that his widow says that he did not die from the vaccine.

The media was quick to say that the reports of him dying from the vaccine was a campaign brought forward by anti-vaxxers to spread misinformation on the internet.

That in and of itself is misinformation because the person who made the statement about him dying from the vaccine was Tommy Hearns.

About an hour before Hagler died Thomas “Hitman” Hearns posted on Instagram, “A real true warrior Pray for the king and his family. He’s in ICU fighting the aftereffects of the vaccine! He’ll be just fine but we could use the positive energy and Prayer for his Full Recovery!”

Today, the wife of Hagler was to set the record straight on his passing.

Kay Hagler, the boxerundefineds wife of more than 20 years, released a statement Monday through the same Facebook fan group in which she announced her husbandundefineds death. After thanking fans for their love and supportive messages, Hagler denied speculation that the death was caused by COVID-19 vaccine complications, calling such comments undefinedstupidundefined and undefinednonsense.undefined

Marvelous Marvin Hagler's wife clarifies reports about his death - REVOLT

Haglerundefineds reaction read, with the note that she admitted her English isnundefinedt perfect:

undefinedI was the only person close to him until the last minute, and I am the only person that know how things went not even his family know all the details and I do NOT accept to read some stupid comment without knowing really what happen. For sure wasnundefinedt the vaccine that caused his death. My baby left in peace with his usually smile and now is not the time to talk nonsense.undefined

Hagler went on to announce that there will be no funeral because Marvin hated funerals, but she is planning undefinedsomething specialundefined in accordance with his wishes.

The media went on to accuse conspiracy theorists of turning it into a rallying cry for anti-vaxxers, calling it reckless and dangerous.

Hearns eventually deleted his Instagram post and replaced it with this:

“Allow us to have our peace. Our love and respect to Marvin and his family, this is not an anti-vaccine campaign … It’s outrageous to have that in mind during the passing of a King, Legend, Father, Husband and so much more.”

If you recall, the same thing happened when Hank Aaron died.

I would guess that the Thomas Hearns became a victim of the Vaccine thought police as the media now has become less of an objective outlet and has become more of a cheerleader for the vaccine creating more Orwellian doublethink about whether or not the vaccines are safe for everyone.

Now, I want to make clear that we knew there would be some deaths associated with the vaccine roll out. Bill Gates said it would happen and we know that people have reactions to vaccines all the time, and some of those reactions are lethal.

However, I am beginning to see a dangerous and harmful pattern here and a double standard that has to be observed – and you don’t have to be pro vaccine or anti-vaccine to see it.

The media is demonstrating one of the clearest, most concise displays of true-life Orwellian doublethink regarding COVID-19 deaths as opposed to vaccine related deaths.

Doublethink is a process of indoctrination whereby the subject is expected to simultaneously accept two mutually contradictory beliefs as correct.


In the book, 1984, the protagonist Winston Smith described doublethink as:

“To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself undefined that was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word undefineddoublethinkundefined involved the use of doublethink.”

As we all know by now, countries all around the world define “Covid deaths” as “people who die, of any cause, within 30 days of a positive test result” the number of days changes by country, it is usually between 28 and 60. This trend was started in Italy last spring and spread all around the world.

Globally, with a few notable exceptions, a “covid death” is a death “from any cause” following a positive test.

And when they say “any cause”, they mean it. Up to, and including, traffic injuries, and in one case shooting yourself in the head.

Back in May of last year, a man gunned down by New York City Police was said to have died of the coronavirus five days after he was shot 7 times in the head.

Ricardo Cardona, repeatedly told officers “please kill me” as he ignored orders to drop the weapons, body camera footage of the April 1 shooting in the Bronx shows.

Cardona, who called 911 on himself to draw police attention, later told investigators he wanted to die because he had recently tested positive for COVID.

The official coroner report said he died of complications of COVID-19.

That is how loosely defined “covid death” has become, it is more or less meaningless. However, Covid “vaccines”, and possible related injuries or deaths, are a very different matter. The establishment is going out of its way to make sure everyone understands that anybody who gets ill, or dies, after being vaccinated, is absolutely NOT a “vaccine death”.

What’s hilarious is those same journalists and “experts” preaching against “Covid denial”, are now literally employing our own arguments against us in the name of defending the vaccines.

I was alerted this morning via email about an article that stated while it was sad that people were dying from complications of the vaccine it is for the greater good.

While there was empathy for those who have died of COVID-19 – the article had no empathy for those who die from complications of the vaccine:

“While the deaths are sad, they shouldn’t be cause for alarm,” said the article.

“This actually tells us the vaccine is stimulating an immune response. For most people that response will be entirely tolerable and lead to development of immune memory that protects you from severe COVID-19.”

Meanwhile this article from ABC a few weeks ago, quoted one doctor:

“We have to be very careful about causality. There are going to be spurious relationships, especially as the vaccine is targeting elderly or those with chronic conditions. Just because these events happen in proximity to the vaccine does not mean the vaccine caused these events. Nursing home centers and hospices are of particular concern, because they are homes to incredibly frail populations, and you have to look at the background rate of these events within those populations.”

You see, it’s important not take deaths out of context. After all, many of the people who die after being vaccinated are old and frail and already seriously ill. We need to be “careful about causation”, just because event B happened after event A, does not mean A caused B to happen.

The article continues:

“In fact, an average of 8,000 people die each day in the United States. Some of them may have just received a coronavirus vaccine.”

Apparently 8000 people die each and every day in the United States – translating to roughly 3 million people per year – and falsely attributing natural human mortality to a potentially totally unconnected event might cause panic.

It was okay to create panic about COVID-19 but we are to squash any and all panic about complications or side effects of a vaccine that was given the “right to try” as an experiment to ease panic.

Now, as we are seeing there is reason for some people to be concerned – but that concern we are told is unwarranted because it is nothing, but conspiracy theory brought on by anti-vaxxers.

I also find it a problem that the media seems to think that observing that the COVID-19 inoculations are different form a regular flu vaccine should also trigger ridicule. There seems to be this “go to “ criticism by the media that pointing out the differences between the flu vaccine and the COVID-19 vaccine you are some tinfoil hat nutjob who believes you are getting chipped or follow some other Qanon conspiracy.

However, it is a fact that The Moderna and Pfizer vaccines are based on mRNA technology, which is completely new in a human vaccine. This technology introduces part of the genetic material of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the form of messenger RNA (mRNA). This instructs your cells to make part of the virus which stimulates an immune response that inhibits infection and protects against disease.

All vaccines are designed to generate an immune response — albeit in different ways — to prepare our bodies to fight the virus if and when we encounter it.

Some people are having a hard time with the mRNA vaccines – some people are dying, and these deaths are not being reported or they are being downplayed.

If you report any of these vaccine deaths on Facebook you get a fact check that will say:

“Reports of death following vaccination do not necessarily mean the vaccine caused the death.”

But If you died within two months of testing positive for Sars-Cov-2, you are a “Covid death”, and if you die within two minutes of getting the vaccine, you’re a coincidence.

Nowhere is this contradiction more apparent than in the UK right now, following the AstraZeneca situation.

A quick recap, for those who have not heard: Recently, the Norwegian government suspended use of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, following it being linked to increased risk of blood clots. Several other countries soon followed suit.

Ireland suspends AstraZeneca vaccine amid blood clot reports in Norway | The Times of Israel


This was a huge headline in the Drudge Report for the last two days.

But immediately after the news went out about the concern undefined there were fact checkers who wanted to make clear that:

undefinedIt’s human nature to spot patterns in data. But we should be careful about finding causal links where none may exist,undefined

After 12 months of ignoring the conversation on “with” as opposed to “from”, suddenly all the vaccine pushers have rediscovered the difference. None of them seem in any way aware of their self-contradiction.

It is also a double standard that every day for a year we were seeing the COVID death tolls on the TV screen – a reminder that nothing was being done by President Trump. After we elected President Biden, the death tolls magically disappeared, and the miracle of the vaccine was attributed to him.

If they want to define a “Covid death” as dying within 60 days of a positive test, fine. But then anyone who dies within two months of getting vaccinated is a “vaccine death”. 

In the event the vaccine does cause harm, Pfizer (and the producers of other vaccines), are immune from civil liability.

Which means that, just like us, the producers themselves are well-aware the new vaccines might not be safe, and don’t want a repeat of 2009, when a rushed-out flu vaccine resulted in children suffering life-long complications and receiving millions in damages.

In the final analysis, you must ask yourself a simple question: Do you feel safer taking an untested vaccine, or risking getting a virus with a survival rate of over 99%?