YOUR FUNGUS HAS THE MEASLES
MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
One of the things we have taken for granted is that most Americans have great health. Even those who are considered health compromised have been able to manage their chronic disorders with vitamin supplements, drugs, medicines and now some people are even finding a panacea in tinctures of CBD oils and Cannabis.
20th-century medicine has been crucial in the prevention of infectious diseases, especially in childhood.
Smallpox was eradicated nearly 50 years ago. Thanks to extraordinary international efforts, including ceasefires in wars just so that vaccinations could be administered—polio is on the verge of going the same way.
Measles, mumps and whooping cough can also be prevented with vaccines, and their incidence has declined dramatically in the past 50 years.
Even some less tractable diseases, such as malaria, have started to bend to interventions. Covering more beds with nets have proved to be remarkably effective, perhaps as effective as vaccinations at reducing the incidence of this disease.
Yet the triumph is by no means complete. It is, of course, well known that preventing or treating an infectious disease can have profound effects on the pathogenic organism that causes it.
The evolution of drug-resistant strains is the most famous example of such an effect. Others, equally disturbing, include the appearance of mutant diseases able to evade the protection conferred by vaccines.
But now a new worry has emerged. It appears that intervening in infections may have undesirable effects on the hosts—that is, on people—as well as on the pathogens themselves.
Perhaps evangelizing the benefits of vaccines and antibiotics are creating problems for the body and that ineffective vaccines and antibiotics are now creating a mutated pathogen as scrambled as a Picasso painting.
Microbes are part of a living universe outside us, and often they act as parasites able to regulate the human life span. Over the entireness of the three million years of our species’ evolution, life expectancy has always been between 25 and 35 years until very recently, and infections have been the main regulators of our life span. By learning from observation of nature, human beings progressively improved their living conditions to the point that about 250 years ago life expectancy started to increase. In 1900, mankind had already reached a life expectancy of approximately 50 years.
Today, a child born in a high-income country can expect to live for 85 years. The additional 35 years of life that we gained during the last century are substantially due to many factors.
One is that we now are able to eradicate diseases which used to kill 50% of people before the age of 20. These were viral diseases such as smallpox, rabies, measles, rubella, mumps, and bacterial infections such as diphtheria, tetanus, typhoid fever, and cholera.
The basic reason why these diseases have disappeared is because of improved hygiene, there are also improved antibiotics for treatment of infectious diseases and of course, basic preventative Vaccines have also played a role in improving lives and protecting people from diseases that once killed people at young ages.
However, we are now seeing trouble on the horizon. We are now seeing the rise of ineffective vaccines and resistant bugs and fungi that do not respond to antibiotics or antifungal medicines.
We are being sold on the idea that these resistant bugs are here because we have over-prescribed antibiotics but what about the fact that the pharmaceutical companies are not at all liable for ineffective vaccines? We have been told that we need to have faith that the vaccines work and yet those who question the motives of big pharmaceutical companies are called anti-vaxxers. However, if we dig into history we may be able to pinpoint where the pharmaceutical companies tested the trust of the American people.
This may be one of the reasons we are seeing an uptick in incurable diseases and breakouts of diseases that we thought were long gone.
Back in 1982, four big drug companies – Merck, Wyeth, Lederle, and Connaught, blackmailed Congress by threatening to stop selling vaccines in America unless a law was passed giving them complete immunity from prosecution if someone had ill effects or fatal effects from inoculation of a vaccine.
The pharmaceutical industry knew they were in big trouble because some of the old, crude whooping cough vaccine in the DPT shot was causing brain inflammation and death in many children.
Also, there were reports that the live oral polio vaccine was crippling children and adults with vaccine strain polio, and Americans were filing lawsuits to hold drug companies responsible for the safety of their products.
In a bit of irony, on February 23, 2011, one day after the Supreme Court blocked lawsuits against drug companies for failing to make vaccines safer, they cleared the way for lawsuits against car manufacturers for failing to make seat belts safer.
The inconsistency bred mistrust — mistrust was the evil that started the ball rolling for a future of ineffective vaccines and the choice of some people not to immunize.
Civil liability guaranteed protection and with no protection, there are no guarantees.
Thirty years ago, the wealthiest and most powerful industry lobbying on Capitol Hill and in state legislatures – the multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical industry – tried very hard to get total liability protection for every vaccine that government regulates, recommends and mandates.
The only difference is that three decades ago, government officials were ordering doctors to give children 23 doses of 7 vaccines and, today, that direct order is up to 70 doses of 16 vaccines.
This also raised suspicion.
Parents argued that, if Congress was going to give drug companies partial liability protection through the creation of a federal vaccine injury compensation alternative to a lawsuit, then language had to be written into the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 that protected a citizen’s right to sue drug companies when federal compensation was denied, or the company had the technological ability to make a vaccine less toxic but refused to do it.
Now from birth to death, we are now being told that we must face mandatory vaccines until the age of 78 — we are encouraged to get 130 in total.
That does not include use of any of the hundreds of new vaccines now being developed by drug companies with government approval that will be required in the future, whether those vaccines are necessary or not; whether the vaccines work or not; whether the vaccines are dangerous or not and whether the people want to use the vaccines or not.
They say it is all about public health and yet ineffective vaccines were the reason that the flu epidemic was at its worse last year. This is an inconvenient truth – while the CDC warned that the vaccine was 10 percent effective, the vaccine evangelists were saying that it should not discourage you from getting vaccines.
Now many state governments want to make vaccines mandatory, which of course, is a prescription for tyranny.
Americans are required by law to use more vaccines than any other nation in the world. In no other country – not in Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Germany, and Japan or in any other country are citizens subjected to mandatory use of dozens of doses of vaccines under the threat of being denied public education and health insurance and employment.
I was reading yesterday that in Israel the overall measles-inoculation rate surpasses 95 percent. Most rabbis encourage vaccination based on the Torah commandment to protect one’s life.
So the question is, why are they are having an alarming rate of measles outbreaks?
In 2018, Israel’s Health Ministry reported 4,000 cases of measles, compared with 30 the year before.
Vaccination rates among ultra-Orthodox Jews in both countries have risen in recent months, following calls by prominent rabbis for their community’s children to be vaccinated and even bans on unvaccinated individuals from schools and synagogues.
But new cases are being reported in some particularly insular ultra-Orthodox communities in Israel, New York, and New Jersey, where rabbis believe more in the will of God than in the authority of health officials.
The CDC claims that the spread is due to some of the 5 percent in Jewish neighborhoods that don’t vaccinate.
Or could it be that the vaccines are ineffective and that super measles are now here, just like the new antibiotic-resistant bugs and the fungal diseases that are resistant to treatment?
The rapid emergence of resistant bacteria is occurring worldwide, endangering the efficacy of antibiotics, which have transformed medicine and saved millions of lives. Many decades after the first patients were treated with antibiotics; bacterial infections have again become a threat. The antibiotic resistance crisis has been attributed to the overuse and misuse of these medications, as well as a lack of new drug development by the pharmaceutical industry due to reduced economic incentives and challenging regulatory requirements.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has classified a number of bacteria as presenting urgent, serious, and concerning threats, many of which are already responsible for placing a substantial clinical and financial burden on the U.S. health care system, patients, and their families.
A woman in Alaska named Sari Bailey woke up one morning with green and yellow gunk coming out of her ear. Her doctor told her it was an ear infection and prescribed antibiotics. They didn’t work. Turns out she had a drug-resistant infection that rooted on her mastoid bone, just behind the ear. It nearly killed her and required multiple surgeries to clear.
She had a fungal infection called C. Auris, a drug-resistant fungus that has emerged mysteriously around the world, and it is understood to be a clear and present danger.
While we warned you weeks ago of the fungus, the mainstream media is just getting around to talking about it and even then the topic is mired in chronic secrecy.
It is becoming commonplace to find hospitals, doctors and public health agencies that remain silent when it comes to talking about their troubles with resistant bugs, though they widely acknowledged the existence of the problem and some of the default answers as to how to prevent this from spreading are better hygiene and or vaccines.
We understand that we are now tackling an issue that is so scary, it feels easy for some people to ignore, less frightening to bury—but it is an issue that we need to explore and wonder if there is any way to reduce risk or prevent the problem without over medicating or jumping into a vaccine that brings more harm to the body.
Just as there are many different reasons people decide not to vaccinate, there are many reasons people decide to vaccinate.
People who have an anti-vaccine stance and people who have a pro-vaccine stance are often working with at least some of the same information. However, as I have pointed out – it all boils down to a matter of trust.
The pharmaceutical companies have worn thin the trust of Americans.
The idea of demonizing those who do not vaccinate hardens the resolve of those who feel they are being singled out.
The number of people who don’t vaccinate at all is smaller than the number of people who under-vaccinate or who don’t vaccinate on schedule and so the overwhelming campaigning against these people also appears to be suspect.
It suggests the conspiracy of a group of people who are all of the same opinion, and that’s just not the case. There is no one reason people decide not to vaccinate or even under vaccinate.
But there seems to be a conspiracy of viciousness when we hear of those who wish to require by law that everyone gets vaccinated.
Vaccines are pharmaceutical products that carry a risk of injury or death, a risk that can be greater for some than others. If a vaccine is effective, then those choosing to use that vaccine will have nothing to fear from those who make another health care choice. If a vaccine is not effective, then consumers are being asked to take two risks: a risk they will be harmed and a risk the vaccine will not work at all.
That is not a product that should be legally required, especially when doctors cannot predict ahead of time who will be harmed by a vaccine and there is no civil liability for the company selling it, the person giving it or the government official mandating it.
You don’t have to be against vaccinations to see that this is tyranny and with these new fortified infectious diseases attacking us we are seeing that old school antibiotics and vaccines are not working.
If we don’t learn from history, we will repeat it and we will see mortality rates soar as we go back to the way it was with medieval medicines. We can acknowledge the improvements that science has given us but cutting corners and greed has put us in the crosshairs of fatal encounters with diseases we once could beat.