5/20/19: SYNTHETIC CLIMATE W/ JIM LEE
MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS
In 2007, during the biggest hype of the global warming fears, there were scientists who were saying that by 2015 the planet would be facing something akin to an extinction level environmental catastrophe.
The entire process of a scientific scare gave way to all sorts of movements towards pressuring people into believing that anthropogenic global warming was indeed a reality and that there needed to be some very drastic measures that needed to be carried out in order to avoid a major environmental catastrophe.
It was argued that perhaps the planet was beyond repairing itself and that it was mankind’s responsibility to go in and do a surgical “operation” called geoengineering.
Geoengineering of the planet has been called many other things: climate engineering, climate remediation, climate intervention and, in some circles, it is compared to planetary chemotherapy. While skeptics argue that there is no way science has the power to control the weather, science has said that they have the power in extreme conditions to alter the atmosphere and will do it if necessary to somehow “save” the planet from extinction.
What we are truly witnessing with geoengineering is junk science evolving into mad science and literally confirming all of the fears presented by those who keep a close watch on things like chemtrails or ionospheric heating.
The mad schemes of geoengineering are a threat to the planet and it is also evident that so are global warming alarmists, especially alarmists with enough money to carry out experiments that could create an environmental catastrophe such as methane releases into the atmosphere, earthquakes and weather modification.
However, most of the information provided by the U.N. on Climate engineering has been removed from the internet.
Global climate engineering operations are creating ever more extreme weather and temperature whiplash scenarios. The immense scale of climate forcing being carried out by the geoengineers is wreaking havoc on the biosphere. Over 70 years of covert climate intervention and weather warfare has done unimaginable damage to the planet’s life support systems.
The blowback is already unfolding and will get rapidly worse. The extreme and unprecedented temperature imbalances already occurring in the US, and forecasted scheduled to occur, are beyond alarming.
The quick fix is failing and those who want to reduce Co2 with their various patents could not be happier because they believe that they can fix whatever geoengineering has damaged.
The climate war should be declared a criminal act.
The ongoing official denial of global climate engineering operations is beyond criminal. Exposing and halting the climate engineering insanity is the great imperative of our time.
California this week had a climb of hot temperatures, only to crash into March like temperatures and heavy rains — this is not evidence of Climate Change – this is evident of geoengineering, where ionospheric and stratospheric experiments with aerosol injections are replacing what was once called chemtrails.
Snow is still falling in various places around the country in the month of May which is, of course, unprecedented and as climate change advocates are telling us to prepare for a hot summer, we need to be aware of its late start and how cool the temperatures have been. I am sure that over time, the climate will swing cooler as the volcanic activity has been on the increase but don’t expect to hear this from mainstream sources – Climate Change and Global Warming are finding new friends and supporters, including parents who believe Climate Change should be taught in the public schools.
A large majority of parents in the United States want their children to learn about Climate Change in school, according to a new poll from NPR and Ipsos. The poll shows that 84 percent of parents in the United States with kids under 18 years old support the teaching of Climate Change.
Whether they have children or not, two-thirds of Republicans and nine in 10 Democrats agree that Climate Change should be taught to children in classrooms, according to the poll. Sixty-five percent of parents who think climate change should be taught don’t think parental permission is necessary.
A separate poll found that 86 percent of teachers agree that it should be taught in schools.
While most states have classroom standards that mention human-caused climate changes, most teachers (55 percent) are not talking about it in their classrooms.
The most common reason (65 percent) teachers gave was that it was outside their subject area. Other reasons were that teachers don’t have the materials to teach it, don’t know enough about the subject, or that their school doesn’t allow the subject to be taught.
This means that there are rogue teachers that secretly teach it or at least present it as a political issue which may or may not include what political changes have to be made in order to combat climate change. Fewer than half of parents (45 percent) discussed climate change with their children, the poll found.
I know what will not be discussed and that is how geoengineering and tinkering with Mother Nature will cause eco-collapse and meteorological upheavals that will damage climate for years over many parts of the United States.
While the World Meteorological Organization keeps pushing the global warming swindle, claiming that 2018 was the warmest year on record, and the MET office claiming that April 22 was the hottest Easter Monday ever, reality hits hard with record cold temperatures and snowfall around the world… well into spring.
At the moment California rainfall is off the charts, in fact, the state has been rained on and will certainly a month or two of rain in one week. The National Weather Service’s San Francisco office said that through May 22 the state is expected to get 150-200% of its normal monthly rainfall.
They attribute it to something called atmospheric rivers.
Atmospheric rivers suck up water vapor from the ocean, transport it along narrow regions in the atmosphere and then dump precipitation in massive amounts on land.
The storms that produce this much water are force multiplied superstorms.
It will be sending an unbelievable amount of rain and snow to the area.
Already the climate zealots are claiming that this all attributed to Climate Change.
Climate is the average weather in a given area over a longer period of time. A description of a climate includes information on, the average temperature in different seasons, rainfall, and sunshine. Also, a description of the chance of extremes is often included. Climate Change is any systematic change in the long-term statistics of climate variables such as temperature, precipitation, pressure, or wind sustained over several decades or longer.
Extremes or anomalies do happen in a weather system all of the time – an increase in anomalies could mean that there is an unstable jet stream or it could mean that there are conditions that cool the areas which combined with warm moist air create super storm systems that trigger severe weather.
We need to understand the classical period used for describing a climate is 30 years, as defined by the World Meteorological Organization.
It is interesting to point out in timelines and warnings where anomalies are present how that the Global warming crowd will tell us that we are always close to a climate Armageddon.
Remember, it was just 2007 when the IPCC warned that the world had only eight years to avoid the worst effects of Climate Change. The most recent report, released in October 2018, claims that we have 12 years to avoid the worst of Climate Change.
Again, when this doesn’t happen, they will just move the goal posts.
We make fun of evangelical preachers that predict a world apocalypse but when politicians and technocrats do it, we have to apply socialist programs that eventually slide into communist agendas.
This should outrage us as Americans — the hypocrisy is a dangerous catalyst for more hate and fear mongering.
Tornado alley has now awakened as geoengineers have been attempting to cool the weather to stop global warming – this triggers severe thunderstorms and Tornadoes in rare places around the globe.
An 800,000-square-mile swath of the central United States is now at risk for rounds of severe thunderstorms, continuing all week. While tornado season happens every year, Chemical Ice Nucleation in the clouds, Aerosol Injections, and the Solar Minimum all have a hand in these severe patterns.
As the solar minimum intensifies, temperatures plummet. Unusually cold April temperatures affected more than 100 million people just in the US as the planting season took a serious hit around the world. The result is that farmers are going bankrupt in the US while in North Korea and China food production is suffering massive losses.
Spain, Portugal, Italy, and Germany were also hit by unseasonable snowfalls; meanwhile, French vineyards froze, compromising this year’s wine production. Africa was also hit by unusually low temperatures with Algeria and Morocco covered in snow this month. In the Southern Hemisphere, Western Australia had the coldest April day ever due to a huge Antarctic front. The cold also interfered with wheat production in the country, with harvests hitting an 11 year low.
Record rain and floods in the Middle East not only promoted desert blooms at a very odd time of the year but also wreaked havoc on the human population with thousands displaced in Iran and Afghanistan.
Windstorms have also been intensifying in unusual places as the jet streams continues its chaotic meandering; both China and Pakistan suffered the consequences this month.
Extremely powerful ground-based microwave transmission facilities are being used in conjunction with the ongoing atmospheric aerosol spraying operations to completely manipulate Earth’s climate systems. The planet’s former weather equilibrium has long since been completely derailed, natural weather as we once knew it has virtually disappeared.
Weather now and in the future will be synthetically produced.
With geoengineering, technocrats are changing how the planet works. It is not just that human activities have stained every corner of the entire planet. The simultaneous arrival of a range of powerful new technologies are starting to signal a potential takeover of Earth’s most basic operations and ecosystems.
Weather control has always been a matter of conspiracy theory.
But there have been credible journals and papers like in the journal, Environmental Research Letters, proposes using a technique known as Stratospheric Aerosol Injection, which they say could cut the rate of Global Warming in half.
The technique would involve spraying large amounts of sulfate particles into the Earth’s lower stratosphere at altitudes as high as 12 miles. The scientists propose delivering the sulfates with specially designed high-altitude aircraft, balloons or large naval-style guns.
Early this summer, a research team from Harvard University will conduct the first field test of geoengineering the climate. They plan to use a high-altitude planes and balloons to place reflective particles into the stratosphere above the arid landscapes of the U.S. Southwest. There they will examine how effectively the particles beat back incoming solar energy. Scaled up appropriately, the technology could in the future be used to rewrite the planetary rules in a way that echoes the changes wrought by gene drives.
Technologies in geoenegineering and climate engineering go a quantum leap beyond what stratigraphers were noting when they recommended renaming this epoch the Anthropocene. That is a time where it is believed that human activity has been the dominant influence on climate and the environment.
Accidental changes are entirely different from deliberate ones. This makes us question what is really behind the spikes in peculiar weather.
The technologies being tested today are designed for consciously taking control of some of the key physical processes that shape our world—and that includes climate and weather.
The bedrock laws of nature don’t disappear, of course, but they become subject to a deeper kind of manipulation. You could think of these as not simply “cosmetic” changes but “metabolic” ones.
Charles Darwin’s evolution, adaptive mutation and the conventions of atmospheric physics becomes a subject that becomes too fragile for renegotiation.
Once we cross a line, we may not be able to go back.
The crossing of this line represents radically new territory for both our species and for the planet. Nature itself will be shaped by processes redesigned and “improved” by geneticists and engineers.
We should call this transition the beginning of a “synthetic age,” a time in which background constants are increasingly replaced by artificial and “improved” versions of themselves.
Geoenegineering is not just a panacea for cooling the planet — it is also a means to change the planet’s metabolism.
This remaking of the metabolism of the Earth strikes at the very core in a literal sense.
The core of the planet is also showing signs of being unstable and with it, various land masses are ripping apart and could spawn intense large scale earthquakes for 25 years. It could also affect the magnetic field and if the magnetic field collapses, we would certainly be plagued with extreme problems from the sun.
Researchers, politicians, and people of all nations will split on the wisdom of crossing these thresholds. They are no doubt exciting prospects to some. But they are absolutely terrifying ones to others. Technologies this consequential must be subject to the fullest and most inclusive public scrutiny possible because all we need in one bad decision and we could start a chain reaction that could create eco-collapse.
An Anthropocene epoch requires one kind of psychological adjustment and the urgency to adapt. A synthetic age demands something considerably more.
The hybrid nature of the ‘Anthropocene’ term is a loaded set of technical and political claims wrapped in geological language. With a full-on media and education blitz, people are more than likely going to believe that we can battle climate change – when climate change happens with or with or without human contribution.
The propaganda has allowed it to gain traction and move well beyond the community of Earth System Scientists. As it moves and morphs, we should take care not to throw the term about too freely. It is heavier than it looks.
If there is any reason to question the motives of the technocrats—the state department just deleted from their records all mentions of climate engineering as a plan B.
It is rumored that it will be a supplemental program to the plan of reducing Co2 emissions.
The University of Cambridge is looking to establish a “centre for climate repair”, led by former UK chief scientific adviser David King. One focus will be investigating “approaches that might be used to repair the damaged climate”
Of course, the uses of aerosol trail injections to create gray sky conditions to cool the planet have not been ruled out.
Emily Shuckburgh, who leads the University of Cambridge’s Carbon Neutral Futures Initiative, says there is a spectrum of approaches to consider. But current plans and methods of geoengineering intervention (such as sulfate trails) have been found to disrupt weather patterns.
ETC Group, a Canada-based NGO, wants an immediate stop to any open-air projects, noting that the projects have been underway for some time. Geoengineering’s problems, the group contends, include unintended impacts on the climate, governance questions – what if one country’s geoengineering negatively affects another country and promoting inaction on climate change?
Not only are we seeing the metabolism of the planet changing with weaponized weather – but it seems there is a climate war over whether or not geoengineering is wise for a band-aid against a heated planet.
At a United Nations Environment Programme meeting in March, the US and other countries blocked a resolution calling for a report into solar geoengineering, though this was partly due to a disagreement between governments on what international body should oversee it. Again, this prompted a takedown of all documents pertaining to Climate engineering as a viable main plan and now some see it as a supplement or a Plan B.
No one can agree n whether or not the plan to chalk the skies with chemical trails is helping.
I am sure that those who have seen the skies and have seen the weather’s anomalous spikes know the answer to that.
Until then, enjoy the synthetic weather, programmed and hacked for the pleasure of those who wish to tax us and politically alter the political landscape.