Ground Zero, Recent Shows
7/17/19: CONSISTENT GEOCAUSALITY W/ JIM LEE

CONSISTENT GEOCAUSALITY

MONOLOGUE WRITTEN BY CLYDE LEWIS

I have been playing catch up on my TV watching after I binged on Stranger Things. I have been watching the Bob Lazar documentary in the wake of the Area 51 stories. There is also the miniseries about Chernobyl that people need to see because it actually shows us how something as devastating as a nuclear disaster can be put into perspective and how the earth is capable of resilience and how life always seems to find a way.

The recent HBO miniseries Chernobyl brought back memories of the event that seems synonymous with “disaster.” Experts had predicted a high death toll on all life as a result of the radiation bath. People were quickly evacuated from a 3500-km area, and the cities closest to the nuclear plant quickly became ghost towns. A 30-km Chernobyl Exclusion Zone was enforced.

But to everyone’s surprise, though, life in the exclusion zone is thriving 33 years later.

Even though the exclusion zone will remain contaminated to some degree for thousands of years, not all the “hot” isotopes will last that long and not all are equally dangerous.

The Chernobyl reactor released many radioisotopes into the atmosphere, some with relatively short half-lives. One of the biggest risks for humans from Chernobyl was radioactive iodine, which concentrates in the thyroid gland and can cause thyroid cancer. Its half-life is on the order of eight days, however, so within four years after the disaster, levels had dropped enough to make dairy products safe again for consumption. Cesium-137 and strontium-90 have half-lives of around thirty years, so they will remain a concern, but some of these can leach into the soil by rain and be transported by wind, and thus dissipate sooner.

A United Nations report twenty years after the disaster says, “Although plutonium isotopes and americium 241 [half-life 432 years] will persist perhaps for thousands of years, their contribution to human exposure is low.”

One other consideration is that the biosphere is bombarded with ionizing radiation all the time, from radon in the soil, carbon-14 in the air, gamma rays from space, and other sources. It’s the increment above what experts consider safe levels, therefore, that determines the risk, and that diminishes with distance from the source.

Without a doubt, the area received a highly dangerous dose of radiation at first. A few dozen people died within the immediate aftermath of the explosion. Experts estimate that about 4,000 people “could” die from cancer, but as years go by, it’s increasingly hard to attribute the cause to Chernobyl as radiation levels decrease.

Many more owe their lives to the heroes who died to entomb the reactor shortly after the accident. Pine trees died, and animals within the hot zone died but not all of them. And now, to the experts’ surprise, the area is doing remarkably well.

As I was reading about how the area continues to bounce back – I could not help but remember the words of Michael Crichton, the science fiction author who wrote, State of Fear a book that was inspired by the Chernobyl disaster.

He wanted to warn everyone about ecological scare tactics that have often been used by Global Warming zealots and how none of them want to look at the big picture and how the planet left to its own defenses tends to bounce back.

He said that there seem to be a number of information invalids that are pushed on people where those who in authority that tell you that you are doomed and so you begin to act like you are and soon you are in a panic and this leads to drastic behaviors that can become dangerous.

Eventually, those who are told they are going to die by those who are in authority are willing to surrender their common sense for quick fixes that lead to their destruction anyway.

Once again we learn that the earth is resilient – it is a complex organism and we wonder if all of the planet hacking we hear about; namely, geoengineering is breaking down the planet’s ability to bounce back.

With the recent spikes in apocalyptic catastrophes, we are left to wonder about what acts of God are really and what maybe insane acts of man.

As soon as there were worries that the climate was changing pundits were wondering how they could capitalize on fear and crisis. Films were made to exaggerate the alleged crisis, scientists looking for grants signed off on the science, those with patents pending were looking forward to introducing their alternative ideas to get energy, the media declared it a consensus and soon it became a political issue.

This is where Green Revolution got its start – a bold political move that was endorsed by the United Nations and one of the key ways they could implement their drastic plans for sustainability within the guidelines proposed during the 2030 summit.

The Green Revolution proposed a redistribution of wealth and a worldwide socialist policy that many fear is just a green version of communism that will compromise the sovereignty of nations who see themselves as independent.

The ‘Green Revolution’ marked a turning point in our civilization. While it was, and still is, hailed as a triumph of technology, utilizing chemistry to revive over-farmed soils and increase crop yields worldwide, it took us down a path that has lead us to where we are now. There are 34,000 pesticides currently registered for use in the US by the EPA and modern agriculture has become completely reliant on their use.

This increasing reliance on technology and the movement away from nature has cost us dearly. Our soils have been poisoned, our air is toxic and the entire planetary ecosystem suffers from mass death and destruction, while our foods become increasingly depleted of nutrition. It’s an entirely unsustainable practice, yet with the introduction of GMOs, there is no sign of it letting up.

According to environmentalists, we’re on a runaway train that is heading for an inevitable crash.

Vice reported recently that scientists are genetically engineering plants to fight climate change. The hacking of plants seems to be an acceptable way of playing against Mother Nature and seems to be okay because it is all about fighting the climate.

Scientists have figured out how to genetically engineer plants to grow deeper roots, potentially improving carbon storage, drought resistance, and flood protection.

This research comes as part of the Salk Institute’s Harnessing Plants Initiative, which seeks to use plants to capture carbon from the atmosphere and store it in the ground.

When a plant grows a deeper root system, it helps store carbon deeper underground in more stable soil. Controlling how a plant’s roots grow, though, is not as easy as it sounds. Scientists have long known that the plant hormone auxin is responsible for root growth, but didn’t know exactly how it affected the shape of the root system.

For many years now, climate opportunists and zealots have used fear-mongering to gather support, especially from young people as they continue to say that the earth has an expiration date. Various Global Warming advocates have said that the world has just decades to survive – sometimes we have less and sometimes we have an extension if we just change the way we govern ourselves and if we just vote for a Greener government there will be a miraculous change in the spike in weather disruptions and earthquakes on the planet.

For many people, it is confusing and so rather than question they tend to adopt a kind of Pascal’s Wager with regard to Climate Change.

Pascal admonished people that they should act as if there is a god whether you believe in one or not. The same can be said about what Climate change advocates say, even if the climate isn’t changing we would be better off if we act as though it is or it will eventually.

Well, this can be both good and bad. Science can continue to develop ways to create better resources on the planet and help the environment but mad science and geoengineering the planet can lead to consistent geocausality.

Now, mind you consistent geocauslity is an axiom I made up that describes what happens when we play with Mother Nature. Consistent Geocausailty is the result of terraforming and weather control – it can also be the result of environmental damage caused by advanced electronic weapons that not only affect the weather but quite possibly the effect the entire geosphere.

In June, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration projected a Massachusetts-sized dead zone would happen in the Gulf of Mexico, driven by a vast algae bloom fed by fertilizer runoff from the upper Midwest. As the bloom decays, it sucks the oxygen out of the water. As a result, as NOAA puts it, “habitats that would normally be teeming with life become, essentially, biological deserts.”

After heavy rains create phosphorus runoffs and which becomes food for algae. During algae blooms, superheating creates even more problems. This creates an area that fuels hurricane formation. Many will say that these cyclonic conditions are normal and that this is why Hurricanes in the gulf are ever-present.

Last weekend the gulf coast prepared for Hurricane Barry. By the time Barry made landfall, it was category 1 hurricane. The winds were not going to be a problem but the rains again would flood out the region.

But the hurricane did not drop as much rain as was expected. Some geoengineering watchdog groups are saying that the hurricane was manipulated and that the algae bloom had a part in zapping its power.

From the phosphorous run offs to dead zones in the gulf to unexplained superheating it appears that planet hacking worked to avoid a major disaster. Algae blooms can be engineered and it is not hard to hack the planet using slurry of iron oxide.

The mad schemes of geoengineering are a threat to the planet and it is also evident that so are global warming alarmists, especially alarmists with enough money to carry out experiments that could create an environmental catastrophe such as methane releases into the atmosphere, earthquakes and weather modification.

In ocean iron fertilization, for example, the amount of carbon dioxide removed from the atmosphere may be much lower than predicted, as carbon taken up by plankton may be released back into the atmosphere from dead plankton, rather than being carried to the bottom of the sea and sequestered.

Russ George is one of those mad individuals that feel that it is his duty to combat Global Warming with his company Planktos. Planktos’ big idea for combating global warming is that you dump some iron into the ocean, it creates a massive phytoplankton bloom, then the algae absorbs carbon dioxide through the process of photosynthesis.

The idea that he proposed was declared risky and possibly reckless. The thing that was overlooked by him and his band of mad scientists is that when algae dies it emits methane which is worse for the atmosphere than carbon dioxide. However, the obvious risks of dumping chemicals into the ocean did not faze George and his half baked effort at geoengineering. It did not stop him; George dumped 100 tons of iron sulphate into the Pacific Ocean.

The first reports about the project, which appeared in British newspaper The Guardian on the 15th of October 2012, presented it as a rogue geoengineering scheme – the largest in history and in “blatant violation” of international treaties. Critics suggested that Russ George had persuaded the Haida Nation village of Old Massett on the Queen Charlotte Islands of Haida Gwaii to fund the project by promising that it would be possible to sell carbon credits for the carbon dioxide taken up by phytoplankton.

He was investigated for misrepresenting his intentions and violating a moratorium on climate modification and geoengineering efforts. Andrew Parker of the Belfer Center at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government told the New York Times that George’s actions had apparently violated an international convention on ocean dumping and a U.N. convention on ocean fertilization for geoengineering purposes, along with a set of voluntary principles on geoengineering developed at Oxford.

George maintained plausible deniability by once again claiming that he wasn’t geoengineering at all: he was just trying to help the indigenous Haida people who live the region to re-invigorate their salmon fishery by increasing the fishes’ food supply.

Scientists can only be outraged at such a rogue display of mad science.

Coincidentally on October 28th, 2012, a 7.7 earthquake hit the coast of British Columbia and there have been as many as 40 aftershocks including one that measured 6.4 in magnitude. The quake sent many residents on the coast fleeing for higher ground due to tsunami warnings that were issued as far away as Hawaii. The earthquake originated on the island of Haida Gwaii, the same Queen Charlotte Islands region that Russ George did his mad man scheme of dumping iron sulphate into the ocean.

The iron sulphate may or may not be the issue; however, there may be much more to the story including what effects if any, iron sulphate would have if an electromagnetic signal could be bounced off of it for the possibility of weather control or environmental tinkering.

It would superheat the ocean and thus create an erratic weather pattern or even induce seismic activity caused by a sloughing off of the ocean floor.

Geoengineeing is far more complex than just the use of stratospheric injections to cool the planet – there are many other ways of hacking the planet using metals as conductors of electromagnetic mayhem provided by the military or some other group that knows how to create disasters with simple push of the proverbial domino.

Remember and consider that the U.S. government hurricane manipulation operations were initiated over 70 years ago starting with Project Stormfury, which to this day, is still engaged in hurricane modification operations.

Both weather modification operations Popeye and Stromfury began at China Lake a base in California that specializes direct energy and microwave weaponry. They obviously specialize in weather modification but now many investigators are wondering if they are into creating earthquakes.

If you recall we did a show on the strange activities that happened near China Lake just before two major earthquakes rumbled through the area.

Throughout the month of June, the US military installation at China Lake tested a device that jammed GPS signals for six hours over a huge area of airspace. The GPS interference testing took place on June 7, 9, 21, 23, 28, and 30th.

During this time earthquake swarms plagued California with the crescendo of tremors happening during the fourth of July weekend. Suspiciously all of the quakes formed a grid surrounding China Lake.

Locals claimed that before the quakes there was a strange high pitched sound that was heard and as the quakes were happening, the power lines started glowing red.
Was the testing of a weather weapon or a seismic weapon the reason for the earthquakes—was this the beginning of what can be seen as consistent geocausality?

Early this morning off the Oregon coast there was an area in the ocean that suddenly heated up. This would indicate that perhaps an underwater volcano was about to erupt.

The media said nothing about a possible volcano eruption and for a moment I received e-mails from listeners who wondered if HAARP or some other ionsospheric heater was being aimed at an area near Bandon, Oregon.

At 8:30 AM this morning I was told that there was a magnitude 5.4 earthquake struck off the Oregon coast. This gave me a case of the jitters since there have seen earthquakes all over the ring of fire –and Oregon has been spared. I even mentioned on the air that I worried that Oregon would be next – now the experts say we have a 10 percent chance of the big one hitting somewhere in the pacific northwest.

The quake was about eight miles deep the epicenter of the quake was about 140 miles east of Bandon, Oregon. It happened at 8:00 a.m.

Washington State last Friday, with the temblors, felt into British Columbia and across the Cascade Mountains into the eastern part of the state.

Again there seems to be a pattern or consistent geocausality which shows that a domino effect is occurring and it may all be related to geoengineering – or this can all be a coincidence.

However the facts are that a 6.1 quake hit Japan, a magnitude 6.6 quake hit Australia and a magnitude 7.3 earthquake hit Indonesia. And of course all of this comes just about a week after southern California was hit by the two largest earthquakes that it has experienced in more than two decades near China Lake.

These are all being listed as Ring of Fire quakes and many will say that this is not unusual – but wait!

We have averaged 193 earthquakes of magnitude 1.5 or greater per day so far in 2019. That is very high, but it pales in comparison to what we have witnessed recently.

Our planet has experienced an average of more than 677 earthquakes of magnitude 1.5 or greater per day. That means that the number of global earthquakes right now is more than 3 times above normal.

And the number of very large earthquakes is at a frighteningly high level as well. According to the USGS, there have been 121 earthquakes of at least magnitude 4.5 around the world within the weeks.

Incredibly, the quake in Japan brought the number of global earthquakes of magnitude 6.0 or greater that we have seen so far this year up to a grand total of 84.

This is not normal and the idea of Induced seismicity is being entertained as many world powers are testing weapons – both low yield nukes, electromagnetic weapons.

We are also aware of weather control operations being conducted by the Chinese and the Russians.

The planet has been active and the weather has been acting strangely – it has spiked and technocrats want to call it the new normal but it is not normal and it is not connected to climate.

Either we are gearing up for a global catastrophe or mankind is hacking the planet in order to combat Global Warming.

The process seems to be causing more problems than stopping them.

A new scientific study could bust wide open deeply flawed fundamental assumptions underlying controversial climate legislation and initiatives such as the Green New Deal, namely, the degree to which ‘Climate Change’ is driven by natural phenomena vs. man-made issues measured as carbon footprint. Scientists in Finland found “practically no anthropogenic Climate Change” after a series of studies.

Keep in mind that this comes from a country that is not stupid enough to make the climate a political issue.

According to the study that will be ignored by climate opportunists and geoenegineers:

“During the last hundred years, the temperature increased by about 0.1°C because of carbon dioxide. The human contribution was about 0.01°C.”

This has been collaborated by a team at Kobe University in Japan, which has furthered the Finnish researchers’ theory: “New evidence suggests that high-energy particles from space known as galactic cosmic rays affect the Earth’s climate by increasing cloud cover, causing an ‘umbrella effect.

Cloud cover can be created by a number of ways artificially through geoegineering, using sulfides and other methods that mimic the effects of volcanic eruptions.

The scientists involved in the study are most concerned with the fact that current climate models driving the political side of debate, most notably the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) climate sensitivity scale, fail to incorporate this crucial and potentially central variable of increased cloud cover due to both natural means and through geoengineering maneuvers that attempt to cool the planet.

“The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has discussed the impact of cloud cover on climate in their evaluations, but this phenomenon has never been considered in climate predictions due to the insufficient physical understanding of it,” according to Science Daily. “This study provides an opportunity to rethink the impact of clouds on climate and the effects of artificial clouds that can be used through processes of Stratospheric Aerosol Injections.

This raises urgent questions and central contradictions regarding current models which politicians and environmental groups across the globe are using to push radical economic changes on their countries’ populations.

Conclusions from both the Japanese and Finnish studies strongly suggest, for example, that Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s “drastic measures to cut carbon emissions” which would ultimately require radical legislation changes to “remake the U.S. economy” would not only potentially bankrupt everyone but simply wouldn’t even work, at least according to the new Finnish research team findings.

Geoengineering the planet in order to combat what is called manmade Climate Change is creating disastrous manmade weather and geophysical spikes, which are certainly creating consistent geocausality.

It has been argued that perhaps the planet is beyond repairing itself and that it was mankind’s responsibility to go in and do a surgical “operation” to try and right the wrongs of anthropogenic global warming.

Whether you call it climate engineering, climate remediation, climate intervention or planetary chemotherapy the results of renegade climate control is creating major upheavals on the planet’s ecosystem.

While skeptics argue that there is no way science has the power to control the weather, science has said that they have the power in extreme conditions to alter the atmosphere and will do it if necessary to somehow “save” the planet from extinction.

What we are truly witnessing with geoengineering is junk science evolving into mad science and literally confirming all of the fears presented by those who keep a close watch on things like chemtrails or ionospheric heating.

The mad schemes that cause consistent geocausality are a threat to the planet and it is also evident that so are Global Warming alarmists, especially alarmists with enough money to carry out experiments are responsible for the various environmental catastrophes that ate making the headlines.

With iron slurry dead zones and methane releases into the atmosphere, chemtrails, and ionospheric heaters we may all be witnessing induced earthquakes and weather modification.

The United Nations should be addressing the issue of “environmental warfare” alongside the debate on whether or not “global warming” alarmists will ruin the ecosystem by doing their own rogue experiments while misrepresenting their actions and lying in order to carry out dangerous experimentation with Mother Nature.

We can only hope that she still has the ability to bounce back.

.