Podcast Logo


Posted on May 12th, 2021 by Clyde Lewis


Yesterday, I was watching the fireworks between Antony Fauci and Rand Paul. They clashed over the role of the Wuhan, China virology lab in the origins of COVID-19.

Rand Paul and Dr. Anthony Fauci clash over Wuhan lab theory - CNN Video

During a Senate hearing on the pandemic response, Paul alleged that the National Institute of Health had been sending funding to the Wuhan lab, which then undefinedjuiced upundefined a virus that was originally found in bats to create a super virus that can infect human cells. 

Paul pressed Fauci on the theory that the novel coronavirus was created in the Wuhan lab, and then somehow escaped, either because of an accident or because it was deliberately released.

Paul was literally accusing Fauci of funding and overseeing Gain of Function exercises that included a juiced-up version of SARS COV 2.

Paul was accusing him of cooperating with the Chinese government and supporting the laboratory that bioengineered a deadly virus. 

Fauci noted that although the NIH did fund a project at the Wuhan lab, it was not meant for undefinedgain of functionundefined research into human-made super viruses.

The NIH gave a grant to a group called Eco Health Alliance, which hired the virology lab in Wuhan to conduct genetic analyses of bat coronaviruses and examine how they spread to humans. The Trump administration last year forced the NIH to terminate the grant. 

Ground zero listeners are aware of what Gain of Function exercises are as we were talking about them some two years prior to the COVID-19 outbreak.

Gain of function research is a controversial form of study that involves boosting the infectivity and lethality of a pathogen. Fauci has advocated for the research in the past, but he denied that the NIH was funding it in China. 

But Paul interrupted him and hinted that not only was the virus introduced to the world because of a lab accident, it was also biologically engineered.

undefinedGovernment scientists like yourself who favor gain function … ” Paul said.

Fauci continued to repeat that he did not support Gain of Function activities in China.

Even though Fauci continued to say that he does not support Gain of Function exercises in China—these risky experiments have often been conducted in various areas around the globe including the United States.

Recently we were discussing mind control gain of function experiments using LSD, hypnosis and other technology by the CIA. This was part of the MK Ultra experiments brought over by Nazi Scientists and used on unsuspecting agents and eventually targeted citizens of the United States.

We also brought up other projects like MK ARTICHOKE and MK NAOMI.

Last year there was a doctoral dissertation that renewed public interest in the military-sponsored chemical spraying of impoverished areas of St. Louis in the 1950s and ’60s.

Undisputed is that St. Louis was among several test cities chosen decades ago by government contractors for the spraying of zinc cadmium sulfide, a chemical powder mixed with fluorescent particles to allow tracking of dispersal patterns. The spraying was part of a biological weapons program, the government conceded in 1994, and St. Louis was chosen because its topography was similar to some of the Russian cities the military thought it might have to attack.

Residents were told by military scientists that it was testing “a smoke screen” for protection in enemy attack.

This experiment was a classic gain of function exercise that was ties to a top secret program carried out by the military called MKNAOMI.Project MKNAOMI - Wikipedia

MK NAOMI was the code name for a joint Department of Defense/CIA research program lasting from the 1950s through the 1970s. Unclassified information about the MKNAOMI program and the related Special Operations Division is scarce. It is generally reported to be a successor to the MK DELTA project and to have focused on biological projects including biological warfare agents.

MK NAOMI was a series of Gain of Function experiments or that were considered bio-security experiments.

In recent years, some members of the scientific community have been involved in a vigorous debate over so-called “gain-of-function” experiments involving pathogens with pandemic potential, such as influenza virus. Proponents and opponents of GOF work engaged in extensive discussion about the value, safety, ethics, and validity of this type of research.

Under a NAOMI Military Gain of Function exercise, the fog in San Francisco was used as a cover in order to see whether it could be used to help spread a biological weapon in a “simulated germ-warfare attack.”The U.S. Military Once Tested Biological Warfare On The Whole Of San Francisco | IFLScience

Over a period of six days in September 1950, members of the US Navy sprayed clouds of Serratia from giant hoses aboard a Navy minesweeper drifting two miles along the San Francisco coastline, a bacterial fog quickly enveloped and disguised by the region’s own fog. By monitoring the air at 43 scattered sites throughout the region, the Navy found Serratia bacteria blown throughout San Francisco and extending to the adjacent communities of Albany, Berkeley, Daly City, Colma, Oakland, San Leandro, and Sausalito.

In this regard, the experiment was a success: the San Francisco Bay was identified as a highly-susceptible site for a germ warfare attack and a quantifiable range for the airborne dispersal of microbes was established.

A 1951 military report on the experiment summarized the findings: “It was noted that a successful BW [biological warfare] attack on this area can be launched from the sea, and that effective dosages can be produced over relatively large areas.”

It was estimated that the city’s 800,000 residents had each received a heavy dose of Serratia, inhaling millions of bacteria throughout the testing period. In its report, the military further concluded “that Serratia marcescens is so rarely a cause of illness, and the illness resulting is predominantly so trivial, that its use as a simulant should be continued, even overpopulated areas.”

In 1977, a flu virus swept the world in an event that became known as the Russian flu. It was caused by a strain of flu that, later genetic tests showed, looked remarkably like those that had circulated in 1950. The belief is that the virus escaped from a laboratory during a gain of function exercise.

Gain of Function exercises may also include the deliberate releasing of a disease in order to gauge an effective way of switching it off.

In the Summer of 1984, a force multiplied strain of Brucellosis was tested at Tahoe-Truckee High School in California. The teachers’ lounge was the target area. Seven of the eight teachers assigned to the room became very ill within months. There were other undisclosed locations where the pathogen was tested using an airborne aerosolized delivery system and contaminated mosquitoes.Brucellosis

These clandestine tests were conducted by the CIA and were closely monitored by the National Institute of Health and the CDC. Encouraged by what was seen, the U.S. government passed the newly modified Brucellosis strain to Saddam Hussein to use against Iran in 1986, with the approval of Vice-President George Bush.

Saddam received shipments of both Brucella Abortus, Biotypes 3 and 9, and Brucella Melitensis, Biotypes 1 and 3.

After our good “friend” and CIA operative Saddam Hussein became our enemy during the Gulf War of 1991, he used this pathogen on American troops resulting in the illness referred to as Gulf War Syndrome. More than 100,000 Gulf War vets now suffer from this syndrome, which causes chronic fatigue, loss of appetite, profuse sweating, joint and muscle pain, insomnia, nausea, and damage to major organs.

Troops initially were told that no such infection existed and that the problem was mostly in their mind. Slowly, over the years, authorities were forced to admit that something had triggered severe illness in many Gulf War veterans. By then, a variant of the modified Brucellosis had spread to the civilian population.

Now keep in mind that President Clinton put a moratorium on these experiments. It was just a few years after that people started falling ill to what is now called Chemtrail activity. Chemtrails conspiracy theory gets put to the ultimate test | New Scientist

This has sparked debate on the use of aerosolized inoculations in order to cool the planet using aluminum, barium, and strontium in which studies have shown that exposure to any of these materials can lead to physical disabilities, cancer and dementia.

There is this underlying concern that has been talked about off and on with regard to a major viral outbreak that could be the result of an accidental release, or an intentional release that is meant to wipe out an enemy quietly and without much fanfare.

We need to understand that viruses evolve and with the help of science and the development of warfare agents we can see a contagion force multiply and be kept under glass until for some reason, it is released as a sure fire way to eliminate an enemy or to cull the herd.

During the first twenty years of its establishment, the CIA engaged in various projects designed to increase U.S. biological and chemical warfare capabilities. Project MKNAOMI was initiated to provide the CIA with a covert support base to meet its top-secret operational requirements.

Some of the biological tests were done on humans – huge populations of national security.

On November 25, 1969, President Richard Nixon abolished any military practice involving biological weapons testing and Project MK NAOMI was dissolved.

However, while phantom CIA gain of function exercises like MK NAOMI have allegedly been dissolved, gain of function exercises carried out by the National Institutes of Health, and the United States Government still carry out Gain of Function exercises and according to a Government White Paper published in 2014 Gain-of-function research involves experimentation that aims or is expected to (and/or, perhaps, actually does) increase the transmissibility and/or virulence of pathogens.

Such research (when conducted by responsible scientists) usually aims to improve understanding of disease-causing agents, their interaction with human hosts, and/or their potential to cause pandemics. The ultimate objective of such research is to better inform public health and preparedness efforts and/or development of medical countermeasures.

It can be argued that MK NAOMI is still being carried out but the experiments are buried in the rhetoric of Dr, Fauci, the NIH, the centers for disease control and the World Health Organization.

There has often been the conspiracy theory that COVID-19 was a major worldwide Gain of Function exercise that was used to destroy world economies and pave the way for the Great Reset.

A new report, published by the United Nations, has claimed the COVID-19 “pandemic” would have been prevented had the UN – and specifically the World Health Organization been given more global authority.

The report is titled, COVID-19: Make it the Last Pandemic and are the published findings of the Independent Panel on Pandemic Preparedness and Response, which focuses on how the world can look to prevent “pandemics” in the future.COVID-19: Make it the Last Pandemic - World | ReliefWeb

This “independent” panel is chaired by ex-New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark, ex-President of Liberia Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, and other political figures including noted globalist David Miliband, and was established last May by WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

If you go to independentpanel.org you can read all about how they could have saved the day.

There’s a lot to unpack in the report’s eighty-six pages of bureaucratic double-talk, but their main conclusions are:

Elevate leadership to prepare for and respond to global health threats to the highest levels to ensure just, accountable and multisectoral action.

Focus and strengthen the independence, authority and financing of the WHO.

Invest in preparedness now to create fully functional capacities at the national, regional and global level.

Establish a new international system for surveillance, validation and alert.

Establish a pre-negotiated platform for tools and supplies.

Raise new international financing for the global public goods of pandemic preparedness and response.

Countries to establish highest level national coordination for pandemic preparedness and response.

All of which can be generally summed up as “give the WHO (and their cronies) more money, and more power”.

Each section of their recommendations contains several bullet points of its own, far too many to go through all of them, but there’s definitely some paragraphs that should cause any attentive reader to raise an eyebrow:

WHO to establish a new global system for surveillance, based on full transparency by all parties, using state-of-the-art digital tools to connect information centers around the world and including animal and environmental health surveillance, with appropriate protections of people’s rights.

Which means essentially legalizing global surveillance programs on a massive scale, with – of course – “appropriate protections of people’s rights” and shame on you for thinking otherwise.

And then there is:

Future declarations of a PHEIC by the WHO Director-General should be based on the precautionary principle where warranted.

Which calls for the Director-General of the WHO to have the power to declare a global “pandemic”, not because there definitely is a new disease killing people, but because they think there might be.

Essentially handing the Director-General of the WHO the power to simply create a pandemic whenever they feel the need. Somewhat ironically the panel for “pandemic prevention”, is recommending making “pandemics” far more likely.

Further, the report goes out of its way to praise the countries which engaged in the most authoritarian “anti-Covid” measures.

Specifically, China is praised both for their “fast identification” of the virus, and their incredibly stringent lockdown measures. Another country held up as a good example is New Zealand, which was likewise very strict.

Conversely, the countries with allegedly “poor results” in dealing with Covid – though never named – are universally criticized for “denial of scientific evidence”, “eroding trust in healthcare measures” and having leaders who “appeared skeptical or dismissive” of the pandemic.

It goes on and on in that fashion. Every step of the way praising centralization, globalization and totalitarianism at the expense of sovereignty, individualism and liberty. And while the report itself may couch its agenda in soft diplomatic language, the authors behind the report have been far more forthright about what they really mean.

Throughout the coronavirus “pandemic” narrative we’ve seen national governments all over the world use the crisis to “temporarily” expand their powers.

Now, the United Nations is getting in on the act, hoping to expand its global power mandate.

Is it not obvious what is happening here?

Using disease or a viral release as an excuse to hold power over the world.

They are either exploiting a crisis or they created it.

Knowing the track record of MKDELTA and MKNAOMI and how it was used by the intelligence matrix wouldn’t there be precedent for all of the bioweapon paranoia of COVID-19?

Furthermore, wouldn’t it also warrant the trepidation of people who are contemplating efficacy and safety of the vaccine?

Denounce it as conspiracy theory if you like—but the buzzwords are now being thrown around by legislators like Rand Paul and are disingenuously being denied by Dr. Fauci.