menu Home chevron_right
Articles

PREY FOR GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY

Ron Patton | September 12, 2010

Labor day weekend was actually a pretty enlightening time for me as I arranged a meeting with Author Tracy Twyman and Reed McClintock about a new book that we are about to collaborate on. The book is about the new psychology in America.  Some of my feelings were first expressed in the last article I wrote about exorcisms and a mass demonic possession in “The Devil May Care.” The theory about a mass possession of the people of the United States becomes all the more apparent when we start adopting philosophies that were first shared to us by fascist dictators, terrorists, and killers.
It may come as a shock to many people that the philosophies and actions that they wish to employ in the name of Politics and religion are sociopathic in many respects.
Reed McClintock and Tracy Twyman were discussing with me psychological peculiarities with regards to what the politicians say, and how the people react to what is being said.
We were talking about reactions to the attacks of 9/11, the buzzword of Muslim Mosques near Ground Zero which is triggered the idea of Koran Burnings and the gunman who stormed into the Discovery Channel wanting to kill people.
In the first minutes of the report network TV wanted to report that the gunman and would be bomber  was a Tax protestor affiliated with the right wing tea party.  The reality was a difficult pill to swallow for left leaning reporters.
James Lee took three employees of the Discovery Channel Hostage and with bombs strapped to his body threatened to blow up the building unless the TV show “Kate Plus eight” was removed from their programming lineup.
You see, Lee saw himself as a revolutionary influenced by Al Gore’s movie “An inconvenient truth.”
Truth is, Lee was a programmed eco-fanatic that believed in Eugenics and population controls.  He was to coin a phrase “The Global Warmabomber”
He also cited that the TV show “19 Kids and Counting” was program hell bent on pushing the planet toward extinction. He placed in a manifesto that “All programs on Discovery Health-TLC must stop encouraging the birth of any more parasitic human infants,” he also demanded that the Discovery Channel broadcast solutions for “global warming, automotive pollution, and international trade.
It was quite interesting to see how the story was bent a bit by the left leaning journalists.  Many of them were stating that Lee had to be a conservative because of his views on Immigration.  He allegedly called Immigrant children anchor baby filth and pollution.  Yet it was revealed that Lee was once convicted and imprisoned for smuggling illegal immigrants into the country from Mexico. The position of right wing or left wing doesn’t matter one iota as you dig deeper into the philosophies he has espoused and how it is the underlying dream of the global sustainability cult to eliminate man out of the equation in nature. You would be surprised to learn that sustainability agendas are hidden in the “Global Warming” proposals. Sustainability plans include the culling of humans in order for the earth to become ecologically balanced.
In 1992 there was a proposal for Natural Sustainable development. A comprehensive action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by the United Nations to literally use whatever means necessary to reduce the population of the planet. The plan has also been called Agenda 21 which is a 40 chapter plan on how to implement zero population growth, eugenics, war casualties and socialist programs to reduce populations. The book was an elitist “how to” guide for genocide. It also brought up new and interesting ways to motivate people to accept a crisis so dire that they would be willing to kill themselves to avoid having to live through it.
There are many people who have accepted the “Global Warming” agenda as a harmless agenda that is meant to conserve energy and open the doors to the idea of alternative fuels. While that part of the “green” philosophy is  great for conservation of resources, there are hidden genetics directives that when illustrated can have you understand that “Global sustainability” is the goal of “Climate Change “ policies and it can be said that shows like Kate plus eight can actually generate resentment for people who are secretly into zero population growth.
On January 26, 2009, 33-year-old Nadya Suleman gave birth to eight children. The birth of the Octuplets had raised controversies regarding their mother’s decision to have a large family without any means of independent income and the physician’s decision to help her by the using assisted reproductive technology.  Suleman was called the Octo-mom.
Suleman has 6 other children from a former In-vitro fertilization that are being cared for by their grandmother.  Nadya is bankrupt, with debts nearing 1 Million dollars.  The question is why has a woman in poverty been allowed to have 14 babies using expensive reproduction technology?
Because as I predicted back in 2009, stories such as Suleman’s are there to spark a eugenics outcry. Back in 2009 when The Octo-mom controversy was splashed all over the tabloids, there were people who agreed that Suleman should have been sterilized.
Suleman also is an Iraqi which has also fueled hatred of a different sort. I had presented during a Ground Zero lounge the idea that this story of the Octo-mom would create a Hegelian Problem, Reaction, Solution.  I stated that the consensus opinion at the time was that egotistic “natalists” were the problem; the reaction of my audience and opinion polls were more than supportive of the idea to sterilize breeders that have no regard for the burden they place on society or on the environment.
The aftermath is a fanatic that will stop at nothing to reduce the population or attempt to send a message or manifesto that we need to be more aware of how humans taint the planet. Suleman was partly responsible for unleashing the fear of “breeding running amok,” or “irresponsible breeders,” which is one component of the eugenics argument.  James Lee is not a coincidence.  People should understand the consequences of using sophisticated propaganda in order illustrate the population freak show is going to create a stir. James Lee is in good company with other famous killers and fanatics whose delusions of ridding the planet of breathing humans is a heroic act to save it.
Hitler stated in Mein Kampf that it is important to “sift the human material”  for those who support decisions of the leaders  and those who do not support these decisions. He also believed in culling those who were a burden on society.
The agenda of “sifting human material” is also found hidden in the policies of Global Warming Sustainability.  Jonathon Porritt, who chairs the Sustainable Development Commission says curbing population growth through contraception and abortion must be at the heart of policies to fight global warming. He says political leaders and green campaigners should stop dodging the issue of environmental harm caused by an expanding population.
Porritt, a former chairman of the Green party, says the government must improve family planning, even if it means shifting money from curing illness to increasing contraception and abortion. Do these policies sound familiar?
These policies sound similar to eugenics policies  that existed in the United States prior to World war II and were then adopted and practiced by the Nazis in order to purify the blood lines of race in Germany.
Many of these policies were part of the charter of the Tri-lateral commission. Zbigniew Brzezinski Barack Obama’s foreign adviser was the  co-founder of the Trilateral commission along with David Rockefeller.
The original stated purpose of the Trilateral Commission was to create a “New International Economic Order.” Its current statement has morphed into fostering a “closer cooperation among these core democratic industrialized areas of the world with shared leadership responsibilities in the wider international system.
The Global plan is for all countries to live on the level of third world nations.  Economic sustainability can be achieved through a process known as “end game” strategies.  Which include controls on ecological systems such as food, water and air.  The agenda would severely limit water, electricity, and transportation – even deny human access to our most treasured wilderness areas, it would monitor all lands and people through tracking  and  scientific measures such as biometrics and eugenics.
As the world moves further into economic chaos, eugenics, an old idea cloaked under modern terminology, is making a comeback. During these times it is easy to see how resurgence and re-packaging of eugenics could come about. In the case of Global Warming and economic sustainability, we hear these questions asked by proponents:  Do you have more than two children? Is your carbon footprint putting a strain on the environment?
In the agendas of world economic and environmental sustainability your economic burden on society cannot be tolerated during unprecedented economic times. The growing population of elderly individuals will be an incredible burden on a faltering system.  Some governmental think tanks see younger generations pursuing euthanasia policies as an option.  While we are asked to recycle waste, there are those who wish to recycle or remove Human life for world sustainability.
James Lee is only one of the many eco-eugenicist promoters.  He saw himself as a revolutionary for Global warming and world sustainability, he was not only inspired by Al Gore, he also was influenced by Daniel Quinn’s Book Ishmael. The book paints a grim commentary about planet earth and how humans are destroying it. In the book a Gorilla seeks out and recruits humans to save the planet. In the book humans are the enemy to the world and that the world does not belong to them, man belongs to the world.
The frightening thing about the book Ishmael is that the Virginia Tech shooter was reading it prior to his bloody rampage. Cho-Seung Hui sent his manifesto to NBC before he shot up his school, and killed 30 people. He signed it off as A. Ishmael. He also had the words ISMAIL AX written on his arm. Was Cho seeing himself as a soldier for Ishmael the Gorilla? Is the book a trigger for recruitment into a secret cult of killers that act on behalf of environmental Crusades?
Charles Manson felt the same way about killing off humans to save the planet. Just like Hitler, Cho and Lee, Charles Manson believed the earth was dying.  In many interviews he talked about the planet heating up and the ice caps melting. He was obsessed with the Bible especially Revelation Chapter 9.  Manson was fully aware that the government was preparing the United States for a race war, and an environmental scare.  That is why in his lunacy he was willing to use mind control tactics to get hippies to kill the elites of Hollywood.
If we look back at Manson Interviews in 1987 you can see that Charlie was a “Global warming eco-fanatic” long before Al Gore knew what Power Point was.
In the Ground Zero Lounge show “Turn Me on Dead Man” I had pointed out in 2009 the parallels of Manson’s interviews and what is happening today with toxic psychological environment the places race against race. I theorized that the agendas of civilization clashes, racial tensions, apocalyptic preoccupations and Global pollution, (a new ice age, or warming) were all programmed into Manson.  Manson was a Manchurian candidate that knew about agendas that the powerful elite wanted to implement decades earlier to “thin the herd.”
At age 75 he still speaks from jail about the importance of saving the air, trees and water.
People would comment that Manson preached ghoulish lunacy about stacking up bodies to cleanse the earth from the damage humans have caused.
Well, the ghoulish lunacy he proposed is now the agenda of the “globalists” today.  The question is how did he know and what was he privy to? We all have speculated that Manson was an inside CIA operative programmed to bring down the hippies.  His words were condemned decades ago but are embraced now. How has this happened?
In 1961, the Kennedy administration ordered a “Top Secret” study to determine what problems the United States would face if the world moved from an era of war to a golden age of peace. In other words, how to bring America into the New World Order. By 1963 the selection of specialists and social planners had been made. This study group consisted of 15 experts in various academic disciplines who were selected for their expertise in their various fields. The first and last meetings were in an underground nuclear survival retreat called Iron Mountain.
By the Time the plan was completed Kennedy was already dead and President Johnson demanded that the plan be kept secret.  Johnson claimed that the plans that were discussed in the report would take a generation and a half to fully implement.  The plan was allegedly abandoned.
The “Report from Iron Mountain” was leaked to the mainstream press in 1967.  It argued that though world peace was a nice idea, the economy of war was such a vital part of global sustainability. that there needed to be organized threats and crisis in order to keep the people demanding to be governed and policed.
The report was literally a blueprint of proposed manufactured crises that the government could employ during peace time in order to keep the war and military busy and the people looking for protection from threats.  The report claimed that a gradual implementation of such crisis would guarantee the need for basic social controls.
The report stated several ways that the United States could guarantee social control over its people with the gradual implementation of a failed economy, failed  sovereign government, external enemies of the state, racial clashes, religion abolishment through the demonization of churches, creating a space menace, and an Environmental threat that places the planet near extinction.
These proposals were all thought up in 1961 and it was theorized that it would take a generation and a half to have them take full effect.  A generation and a half is 45 years. In 2006, exactly forty five years after the proposals reported in the Iron Mountain Document, Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” was released in theaters. The ideas that were shown in the movie were the exact same sentiments about Global Sustainability that were stated by Charles Manson decades earlier.  Now you may say that this is an exaggerated view but you must listen carefully and read between the lines.
Gore has repeatedly echoed Eugenics views about Africa. He has stated that overpopulation is the problem there. Gore concludes that Overpopulation is putting great strains on their natural resources and threatening the integrity of their ecological systems, He may be correct, however when using terms of overpopulation, zero population growth, and demanding population decrease worldwide in order to stave off a convoluted Global warming agenda you have to see what the bottom line is with regards to global sustainability.
It is similar to Hitler’s proposed “sifting of human material” to eliminate the carbon footprints of what the elite see as bottom feeders.  In Gore’s book “Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human spirit” he advocated population reduction of 2 billion people.  Now we can see why in the times of the Clinton administration there were fights over AIDS drugs, and bombings of Pharmaceutical companies that would provide cures for health problems in the Sudan.
Using a shield of possible bio-terror planning by would be terrorists; both Clinton and Gore could use plausible deniability when scores of people would die due to not receiving the drugs they so desperately needed.
When a massive earthquake destroyed Haiti, it was Bill Clinton and George W, Bush that said “just send us your cash” and of course many grief stricken individuals gladly opened their wallets. According to a BBC report only 2 per cent of the funds that were pledged to Haiti for reconstruction have been delivered. According to the report, despite all of the mainstream media news coverage and gloating by US talk show hosts about our humanitarian efforts in the region, The US government has honored only a small portion of its pledges.
The US State Department has reported to have said it has given about $675 million through the US Agency for International Development, There is however a huge discrepancy and it is not known how that money was spent has not been detailed and, therefore, it is difficult to determine how much of it was actually spent on projects that benefitted the needy and desperate in Haiti.
The real heroes are the ones who took time away from their lives and took the responsibility to save those who were dying. Many of them were turned away.  Their flights were told to land elsewhere to make way for Military planes.  Doesn’t it seem as though Haiti was targeted for culling?  It was proposed in meetings to balance the environment why wouldn’t it be carried out?
Being aware of the planet and doing your best to procure its future is sound practice, however all things must be kept in perspective.  James Lee, the gunman at the Discovery channel was only carrying out what the men in three piece suits do in Washington D.C., He advocated eugenics, population controls, attempting at culling the heard, and believed he was wiping out humans for the benefit of the planet.
Lee also believed that science, progress, and technology were evil. That they contributed to greenhouse gasses.  He is a product of what the true agenda is for sustainability.  I guess it is also interesting to note that while many people will say that Lee was crazy, they need to look at the views they have espoused about Global warming, Climate change and sustainability.
Those who are happily supporting a green agenda forget that all of the reportedly green ideas all end with the final solution that “humanity is the problem of nature.”  The green agendas demonize human beings as a cancer ready to be cut off and proponents want to see some technologies destroyed for the betterment of society.
James Lee was animate about his “Green ideas.” He wrote them in a manifesto, strapped bombs to his body and was ready to start the war. He said plainly that humans need to die for the sake of the planet. Like it or not he is the first martyr for the green movement.
Al Gore’s ideas were the inspiration for his move, and Al Gore’s ideas have been spun and given religious context and yet we see that notorious figures have espoused these same beliefs.
I can’t help but wonder how the Unabomber, Ted Kysinski is feeling right now.  Knowing as he rots in a jail cell how all of his ideas that were inspired by Al Gore were then reclaimed by Al Gore?  I would wonder how he feels about how his views, along with Hitler’s and Manson’s are all being inserted into children’s programming?  He must feel completely betrayed that ideas in his manifesto appear in Science Fiction movies.
From the remake of the Day the Earth stood still to Avatar the Unabomber is looking more and more like a jailed prophet.
As Klatuu arrives from space in the Remake of the Day the Earth stood still he announces to the world that doomsday has arrived because of climate and environmental catastrophe– he states that “If the Earth dies, you die. If you die, the Earth survives.”
This rationalizes the idea of allowing the demise of a few to warrant the survival of the many.  It is the reinforcement of the idea that “some things must pass away for the greater glory.” The greater glory of god—or perhaps the greater glory of mankind.  Either way in the future someone has to die in order to allow others to live.
Al Gore has called to action many people to fight global warming. He has made statements that literally declare war on humanity for the sake of earth preservation. When we hear of James Lee, and his attempts to send a message about population growth, we may need to look at where these ideas have come from.  People like Lee believe that ways to change thinking have become inadequate and once again we see the idea that change comes from a body count.
To quote Al Gore:
“Modern industrial civilization, as presently organized, is colliding violently with our planet’s ecological system. The ferocity of its assault on the earth is breathtaking, and the horrific consequences are occurring so quickly as to defy our capacity to recognize them, comprehend their global implications, and organize an appropriate and timely response. Isolated pockets of resistance fighters who have experienced this juggernaut at first hand have begun to fight back in inspiring but, in the final analysis, woefully inadequate ways.”
You see, recycling isn’t enough, cutting back on fossil fuels isn’t enough; going to “Climate change” protests isn’t enough. However killing and dying in a war for the planet sends a message.   People have now seen that terrorism often creates a precedent for changing laws and constitutions.
As the Global planners hook you with “climate change” and the socially engineered “saving the planet from the environmental  cataclysmic model” we  could very well see in the future more attempts at killing mass numbers of people to justify the balance of an eco-system and  the urgency to  justify   laws requiring euthanasia, eugenic infanticide, futile care provisions , and weeding out those with undesirable genetic propensities  through the mapping of an infant’s genome literally marking them genetically for a “predisposed outcome.”
Groups like “The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement” believe that Phasing out the human race by voluntarily ceasing to breed will allow Earth’s biosphere to return to good health. They state that crowded conditions and resource shortages will improve as we become less dense.
Ceasing to breed can also be mixed with ceasing to feed. As we see food shortages happening in the world and here in the states consumer confidence has dropped as food sources from meat, eggs, pet food, infant formula, and peanut butter have been contaminated with chemicals and bacteria.  These are all ways to cull an unsuspecting consumer.
Wheat supplies in the world have dwindled and there soaring inflation for meat and milk and bread. Once again Africa will suffer due to the wheat fires that occurred in Russia.
All of these crises, from global warming, food shortages, and economic meltdown can pave the way for new eugenics programs that the world  and the American people will be forced to accept in order to buy, sell, trade or even live on this planet.
Cost cutting medical care is also proposed for mass culling of the populace.  The concerns for pain and suffering are now political and your flesh and blood is part of a political agenda. To the elite you are no longer a soul seeking liberty; you are a liability feeding on an eco-system that is allegedly dying out.
Medical care given by a government seeking population balance is a frightening idea. Just deny life-giving medical treatment to the disabled and elderly and you have plausible deniability in contributing to zero population growth. It is paranoid thinking granted, but needs to be considered now you know the agenda.
Advances in genetic technologies also gives a new insight into the choosing of who is to be born and who is to be neutralized. Advancements in genetic research are on the ready to provide each parent with a blueprint of their child and even the ability to create designer children. This also gives parents a way to see if their child will be born with defects.  Some parents might be pressured to abort a baby that may be considered undesirable.
Every baby born a decade from now will have its genetic code mapped at birth. A complete DNA read-out for every newborn will be technically feasible and affordable in less than five years, this according  to the genetic  company Illumina  which is preparing to launch a whole-genome mapping service within two years. It has already begun seeking consent from its first customers, who are likely to pay between $10,000 and $20,000 for this service.
Genotyping services, which examine about 2 million of the genome’s 6 billion DNA letters for clues to disease, are already available to consumers for about $1,000. Those with deeper pockets can have their whole genome mapped for about $100,000 .
Biotech companies are now offering test screenings for babies to detect Down’s syndrome. Abortion opponents fear that the technology may prompt more couples to terminate pregnancies and advocates for the disabled worry that more of them may feel pressured to abort. They also fear that if the number of those born with the condition dwindles, there could be more discrimination. Ask yourself honestly, if you knew that your child would be born with horrible defects would you allow it to be born?
Even the Pope is now seeing that Eugenics policies are returning as a “quick fix” to global warming   and warns against them. He even stated that “genetic reductionism” is not the answer to eliminating threats to the environment. If the agenda of Global sustainability in the face of climate change did not include the reduction of human life through Eugenics then why would the Pope make reference to this?
Because Eugenics and population reduction are hidden agendas within worldwide sustainability.  James Lee the gunman at the Discovery Channel knew this and supported it, The Unabomber knows and supports this, Charles Manson supports it, Prince Phillip supports it, and Hitler did too.
The question is do you support it?
Eugenics “went underground” after WWII, but continued under the guise of population control and environmentalism, proceeding partly with the aid of Rockefeller family wealth.
Rather than focus on “quality control” the emphasis was on “quantity control”. One of the first books to tie these ideas together post-WWII, titled Our Plundered Planet, was written by Fairfield Osborn, who in 1921 served as the President of the Second International Congress of Eugenics in New York.  You see, the best Eugenics plans were not thought up by the Nazis. They were created by Americans!
The economic hardship that the world faces is also creating a climate favorable to population and eugenics policies. House speaker Nancy Pelosi recently stated that family planning services are a must during these economic times. Government recommended contraception and the imposition of reproduction rights are Eugenics directives.  Pelosi states:
“Well, the family planning services reduce cost. They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children’s health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those – one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government.”
One of President Obama’s first decisions after being sworn into office included the reversal of Ronald Reagan’s ban on United States funding of international family planning groups that provide abortion services. The issue of abortion has been consistently used as a political football to maintain the theatre of the two party system, but the practice remains at the heart of Rockefeller-sponsored population control directive.  No matter how you feel on the issue, Abortion can be used for various eugenics directives.  Another Eugenics directive is the use of Euthanasia. Once again no matter how you feel about the issue of death with dignity it can be used as a tool for eliminating certain members of the populace.
In 2007 The United Kingdom’s Ministry of Defense released The DCDC Global Strategic Trends Program 2007-2036 report. The report outlines a grim economic future of middle class rebellion amidst falling standards of living, brain chip implants, and other forecasts. One scenario in particular states that youth in western societies could see the growing elderly population as a burden, opening the doorway to euthanasia.
We will be seeing growth in the elderly population and they will be a burden on the economy.  If the attitude about life diminishes and the “sustainability” argument becomes keen to the intellect we will be seeing more of the elderly being killed off due to poor health care, and iatrogenic diagnosis.
Americans take so many drugs that 100,000 of us die every year because of those drugs. It is not illness that causes those 100,000 deaths, but the damaging effects of drugs taken for illness. Beyond these deaths there are millions of adverse drug reactions every year, resulting in hospitalizations and death.  Over medicating is also part of the Eugenics agenda. Between the years of 1990-2000 over 569 children were hospitalized, 38 of them were life threatening hospitalizations, and 186 died from antidepressant drug toxicity. Many experimental psychotropic drugs have led to suicides in young people.
There will also be many instances where healthcare will be withheld.  This is also a Eugenics directive.  History has shown us what happens when a mass amount of the populace burdens the system with sickness and disease.
Beginning in 1940, thousands of Germans taken from old age homes, mental institutions and other custodial facilities were systematically gassed. Between 50,000 and 100,000 were eventually killed. A similar example was the Terri Schiavo case where she was disconnected from life support after being in a progressive vegetative state.  Schiavo was literally starved to death.  She was a grim poster child in the argument for the practice of the Eugenics directive.
Barack Obama stated  in the debates that one of his biggest mistakes in the senate was that he should have stayed in the Senate and fought more for making sure that Terri’s parents couldn’t take their case to federal court to save her life.  This is the man that is being praised for his health care bill.  How would you like to be on life support and have the decision of your ability to live in the hands of a man who wanted to see a woman starve to death?
The growing economic crisis, and numerous other crises both real and manufactured, will be held as an example of the need for a new army of social workers and bureaucracy to manage the affairs of average men and women. Among all of the other proposals that the elite are throwing at us to “fix” these problems, such as world governance, the control of food sources and water, the proposal for Global sustainability and other population control proposals written in “The Iron Mountain Report”, The Club of Rome and Agenda 21 are becoming a grim reality.
The needs of the superior humans would outweigh those who are genetically defective.   The philosophy of the elimination of so called human anchors and filth brought to us by James Lee is already being carried out on a larger scale. While many of us are grateful that we are not in the crosshairs of a mass culling or genocide it must be understood that controllers pay no mind to human lives when it comes to their survival.  They see themselves as better than you because of their position.  It needs to also be pointed out that we are unwittingly choosing our executioners.  It needs to be said and it needs to be acknowledged.  It appears that through devious social engineering we will kill ourselves through social wars, race and religious clashes, and political polarization.
Through chaos we will eventually see the order and balance of global sustainability. The new world will be paved over the bodies of the old world. It is an Orwellian dream, a tailor made nightmare all based on good intentions.
What I am writing can be taken as extremism; however the “model citizens” who have preached eugenics directives will eventually carry out their agendas by demanding that the National Security State enforces reproductive limits, infanticide, enforced sterilization and other atrocities. It has been carried out elsewhere and could easily be enforced in the United States.
Once a national security state has created a culture of fear and suppressed dissent, it may safely consolidate power, with minimal questioning by the media or challenges from dissident voices.   When a government consolidates its power it is able to change without much rebellion.   Policies, laws, and even constitutions are rewritten and soon the very thing you feared about your government becomes evident.
The Pathocracy becomes a reality and what we perceive is evil is adjusted to fit the base desires of the murderous and contemptible, all for the saving of this planet.
Do we really hate ourselves that much?

Written by Ron Patton




Search Ground Zero

Newsletter


  • play_circle_filled

    Ground Zero Radio

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 376 – OUTSIDE THE BOX

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 375 – SOLVE ET COAGULA – THE DARK NEXUS OF POSSIBILITY

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 374 – GHOST WRITER W/ DAVE SCHRADER

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 373 – YE GHOSTS OF TERROR YET TO COME W/ NW GHOST RECON

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 372 – FLIGHT 401 – JUST PLANE DEAD

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 371 – RED SHED REDEMPTION W/ PAUL BEGLEY

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 370 – REVELATION ZERO A CASE FOR THE RETRO CAUSAL APOCALYPSE

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 369 – PARAH ADUMAH – THE ADVENT OF THE APOCALYPSE COW

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 367 – SPY GATE: OCTOPUS UNVEILED

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 366 – THE LOOMING OCTOPUS

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 365 – OPERATION GREEN CHEESE

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 364 – ECLIPSE – THE DIGITAL DARK SIDE OF THE MOON

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 363 – DESECRATION MOON

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 362 – COSMIC CONUNDRUM – ALIEN HYBRID WARFARE W/ RYAN WOOD

  • cover play_circle_filled

    Episode 361 – THE INCURSION DRILL W/ WHITLEY STRIEBER

play_arrow skip_previous skip_next volume_down
playlist_play